What if floods left your home unsellable? That's the reality facing more and more people in Britain | Kirsty Major

Floods are leaving homes unsellable in Britain, a grim reality facing more and more people. For Christine, a 70-year-old great-grandmother, her bungalow in Trowell, Nottinghamshire, is a constant worry. The brook that backs onto her home burst its banks in 2020, pouring water into her house and those of her neighbors Jackie and Rhona. Despite being "flood-resilient" after receiving flood-proofing measures, their homes flooded again just eight months later.

The problem lies with the planning rules, which fail to prevent new building developments from increasing flood risks. Developments are assessed one at a time and often done in phases, making it difficult to gauge the overall impact on communities. As Christine, Jackie, and Rhona can attest, this results in increased runoff into waterways like their own brook.

The issue is more widespread than they experience alone. A study by Bayes Business School found that homes at risk of flooding are sold for between 8% and 32% lower than average properties. Even when buyers do manage to find sellers willing to part with their homes, some lenders refuse to provide mortgages due to the increased flood-risk element.

The government has stepped in to cover the flood-risk aspect of home insurance until 2039, but this means mortgage lenders will still avoid funding homes that could lose value if repossession occurs. The problem is further exacerbated by climate breakdown, which is increasing extreme weather events and causing more properties to be at risk of flooding. As many as 100,000 new homes could be built on the highest-risk flood zones in England.

Christine, Jackie, and Rhona are among millions of people facing this very real threat. Their homes are now unsellable due to repeated flooding, a reality that will only worsen unless drastic action is taken to address these planning loopholes and increase funding for flood management.
 
πŸ˜• I'm so worried about Christine, Jackie, and Rhona's situation. It sounds like they're caught in this never-ending cycle of floods, and it's not just them - there are millions more people facing the same issue 🀯.

I mean, think about it - we're building more homes on flood zones because of low planning rules? πŸ™„ That's so short-sighted. And now climate change is making it even worse, which is like, totally fair πŸ˜”.

I wish our government would take some serious action to fix this problem ASAP πŸ’ͺ. Maybe they could increase funding for flood management, or rethink their planning rules to prevent more homes from being built on high-risk areas 🀝.

But seriously, who's gonna buy a home that's constantly at risk of flooding? πŸ˜‚ It makes no sense financially! And what about Christine and her family - where are they gonna go if their bungalow is still flooded after 2039? 🏠

We need to get our priorities straight and address this flood crisis ASAP πŸ’₯. We can't just keep waiting for the government to fix it (although, fingers crossed they will πŸ˜‰). The people affected by floods deserve better πŸ™.
 
🌧️ this is just crazy. I mean think about it, if you buy a home in a flood zone, you're basically buying a ticking time bomb... πŸ•°οΈ 100k new homes on the highest risk zones? that's insane! 🀯 and what about all these ppl who already lost their homes to flooding? πŸ πŸ’” the gov's just covering part of it but it's not enough. we need to think bigger here... πŸ’‘
 
πŸ€• I'm really worried about Christine, Jackie, and Rhona's situation... 100k new homes on high-risk flood zones? That's just crazy! 🚨 The planning rules need a major overhaul, it's not fair to people who are already struggling with flooding. And climate breakdown is making things worse, it's like the government is saying "oh well, that's just how it goes". But it doesn't have to be this way... We need some serious policy changes and more funding for flood management ASAP! πŸ’Έ
 
πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ Can't believe the planning rules in Britain are still so broken! Floods leaving homes unsellable is such a harsh reality, especially for folks like Christine who thought their bungalow was safe. And what's with these phases of development? It's like they're trying to ignore the bigger picture and just build away. Newsflash: it's not that hard to do an overall assessment! πŸ€“ I mean, 8 months after flood-proofing measures, her home flooded again? That's just crazy! And now she's stuck with a house that's basically worthless because of climate change-induced flooding. It's like the system is failing these people, and it needs some serious reform ASAP πŸ˜”
 
I mean can you even believe its 2025 and we're still dealing with outdated planning rules? 🀯 Like, how hard is it to put in place some basic measures to prevent over-development on flood-prone areas? πŸ™„ I'm not saying the government isn't trying, but come on, 100k new homes on high-risk zones? That's just crazy talk! πŸ’₯ And what about all these people who are being priced out of their own homes because of flooding? It's like, totally unacceptable. We need to get our act together and prioritize flood management over profit margins πŸ€‘. Christine, Jackie, Rhona - I feel you guys, this is so not fair πŸ˜”.
 
man I feel so bad for christine, jackie & rhona πŸ€• they're literally living in constant fear of their homes getting flooded again, even with the flood-proofing measures they got done. but u know what really gets me? it's not just them, it's like millions more people who are facing this same issue 🌊 and it's all cuz of our planning rules & climate breakdown πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ

i mean, can't we do better than that? we need to rethink our approach to building new homes & make sure they're designed with flood protection in mind πŸ’‘ not just throw 'em up anywhere & hope for the best. and yeah, the gov's step-in is a start, but it's not enough 🀝

the thing is, this isn't just about these 3 women, it's about all of us who care about our communities & want to see them thrive πŸ’• so let's raise awareness & demand change πŸ“’ we can make a difference, one flood at a time πŸ’ͺ
 
πŸŒͺ️ I'm totally with Christine, Jackie, and Rhona on this one πŸ€• their experience sounds like it's straight out of a nightmare, constantly living in fear that their homes will flood again... what's the point of being "flood-resilient" if you're still gonna get hit twice? πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ

It's crazy that new building developments are basically doing whatever they want and increasing flood risks without anyone stopping them 🚧. The planning rules need a major overhaul, like, pronto! πŸ•’οΈ We can't keep messing around with this climate breakdown stuff... it's only gonna get worse if we don't start taking action ASAP 🌟

I mean, have you seen those figures - 8% to 32% lower sales? It's no wonder lenders are being super cautious πŸ€‘. And what about all these people who can't even sell their homes because they're too flood-prone? It's like, they're stuck in limbo 🀯

We need more funding for flood management and better planning that actually takes into account the bigger picture 🌍. These 100,000 new homes on high-risk zones are just gonna make things worse... it's time to think about the future, not just short-term gains 🚫
 
🀯 This is just crazy πŸ™„. Floods are getting worse and worse in Britain and it's like they're not doing anything about it 🚫. Those old ladies Christine, Jackie, and Rhona are stuck with homes that are basically unsellable because of the constant flooding πŸ’§. It's not just them either, there are millions of people facing this problem 🌎. And to make matters worse, climate change is making things even more extreme β›ˆοΈ. We need to do something about it now 😩!
 
πŸŒͺ️ This is just unacceptable. I mean what's the point of even building new houses if you're just gonna flood them out? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ Christine, Jackie, Rhona... poor ladies! They've already experienced this horror show twice and they're still stuck. And it's not like they were expecting a disaster movie scenario or anything. It's just common sense to prevent development in areas prone to flooding, but noooo... the planning rules are too lax πŸ™„. 100,000 new homes on flood zones? That's just crazy talk! What about all those people who'll be stuck with unsellable homes and mortgages that won't work out? 🀯 It's time for some drastic action!
 
I'm worried about all these poor folks loosing their homes πŸ€•. It's just not right that the planning rules are so broken. They're basically building new houses in flood-prone areas, then wondering why it floods again and again. We need to rethink our approach to development and make sure we're not putting people's lives at risk for a short-term gain. Climate change is making things worse, but it's not an excuse - we need to take responsibility and fix the system. The government's support with flood insurance is a good start, but we need more than just a band-aid solution 🚧πŸ’ͺ
 
🌧️ I feel so sorry for Christine, Jackie, and Rhona, their lives are being turned upside down by something as simple as a brook bursting its banks... it's not just them, though - the entire community is suffering because of outdated planning rules that let developers build in flood-prone areas. It's like they're saying "build, build, build" without even thinking about the consequences 🀯. The fact that homes sold in these areas are worth 8-32% less than others is just ridiculous - it's not fair to people who've already experienced flooding and will likely face it again. We need better flood management and stricter planning rules ASAP πŸ’ͺ
 
πŸ˜” It's just getting worse out there, folks. I mean, who wants to buy a home in a place where the risk of it flooding every other year? πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ The government's trying to help with the insurance thing, but at the end of the day, it's all about the lenders not wanting to take the risk. And what happens when they don't want to lend out money? Home prices drop, and people can't sell their homes because no one wants them πŸ πŸ’Έ. It's like a never-ending cycle of worry for folks like Christine and her neighbors. The planning rules are all wrong, imo – it's just too easy to overlook the flood risks when building new developments. We need some serious changes if we're gonna fix this stuff... or else a lot more people will be stuck in this situation πŸš§πŸ’”
 
πŸ€• I feel so bad for Christine, Jackie, and Rhona! 🌊 It's like, they did everything right, got those fancy flood-proofing measures, and still their homes keep flooding. It's just not fair that the planning rules aren't doing enough to prevent this from happening. 🚧 And on top of that, the climate breakdown is making things worse... it's like, we're just spinning our wheels here. 😩 I mean, 100,000 new homes in flood zones? That's a huge risk for anyone who might buy those homes. πŸ’Έ And what about all these people whose homes are already unsellable because of flooding? They deserve some help! 🀝 The government's stepped in to cover insurance costs until 2039, but that just means more stress and uncertainty for people like Christine and her neighbors. 😬 We really need to do better here...
 
Back
Top