In the face of democracy's erosion, how do we act? For years, this was an abstract question. The once-distant specter of authoritarianism had become academic fodder. Germany in the 1930s seemed like a distant memory, its dark parallels to current events a rare occurrence.
However, that is no longer the case. Authoritarian populism has spread across the world, from Argentina to Indonesia, and even within Western democracies like Italy and France. The most striking example, though, remains the United States under Donald Trump's second term. Nine months into his presidency, America is revealing its true face: a society where immigrants are purged, power is concentrated, dissent is suppressed, oligarchs are rewarded, and truth and law are scorned.
Trump's policies are not unique; many governments that claim to be alternatives to populism have begun to emulate its features. Even Keir Starmer's government has adopted some of the same tactics, such as a harsh approach towards asylum seekers. Yet, Trump's presidency is particularly unsettling, with over three years left in his term and potentially more if he manages to overcome constitutional and electoral obstacles.
The domestic impact of Trump's regime varies greatly depending on where you live. In California, one of the places he dislikes most, due to its liberal values and multiculturalism, his regime has intervened aggressively. Los Angeles is a city that exemplifies this tension. The usually vibrant neighborhoods of Boyle Heights are eerily quiet, with bakeries and cafes empty and only a few outdoor seats taken. Fear of arrest, detention, and deportation has kept many people indoors.
In contrast, the arts district of downtown LA is bustling with activity. People gather to enjoy expensive iced coffees and artisanal sandwiches while discussing their latest cultural projects. It's as if they're trying to escape the reality of Trump's presidency, which would likely be detestable to them.
This dichotomy raises an important question: how do we react when our democracy is being dismantled? Do we retreat into passivity or engage with politics? Often, these impulses coexist in people, especially when faced with something as provocative and exhausting as hard-right populism. Some may adopt a "wait and see" approach, while others will take action to resist the regime.
A recent protest in Beverly Hills, California, was a striking example of this divide. Thousands of people marched against Trump's policies, carrying witty anti-Trump placards and chanting slogans. The event was uplifting, with politics coming alive for many participants. However, in San Francisco, the response is more jaded. Many people view Trump's regime as a malign fact of life, something to be endured rather than actively resisted.
The challenge ahead is creating an equally relentless and compelling movement to resist rightwing populism. Unless populism's opponents can draw in those who are victimised and scared into silence, this age of autocrats will carry on. The US and Britain are already facing this reality, with Reform UK promising a Trump-style deconstruction of Whitehall if they win power.
The key is not just to sporadically resist or express contempt for the regime but to create an equally powerful movement that draws in more people and inspires them to take action. Anything less will allow authoritarianism to prevail.
However, that is no longer the case. Authoritarian populism has spread across the world, from Argentina to Indonesia, and even within Western democracies like Italy and France. The most striking example, though, remains the United States under Donald Trump's second term. Nine months into his presidency, America is revealing its true face: a society where immigrants are purged, power is concentrated, dissent is suppressed, oligarchs are rewarded, and truth and law are scorned.
Trump's policies are not unique; many governments that claim to be alternatives to populism have begun to emulate its features. Even Keir Starmer's government has adopted some of the same tactics, such as a harsh approach towards asylum seekers. Yet, Trump's presidency is particularly unsettling, with over three years left in his term and potentially more if he manages to overcome constitutional and electoral obstacles.
The domestic impact of Trump's regime varies greatly depending on where you live. In California, one of the places he dislikes most, due to its liberal values and multiculturalism, his regime has intervened aggressively. Los Angeles is a city that exemplifies this tension. The usually vibrant neighborhoods of Boyle Heights are eerily quiet, with bakeries and cafes empty and only a few outdoor seats taken. Fear of arrest, detention, and deportation has kept many people indoors.
In contrast, the arts district of downtown LA is bustling with activity. People gather to enjoy expensive iced coffees and artisanal sandwiches while discussing their latest cultural projects. It's as if they're trying to escape the reality of Trump's presidency, which would likely be detestable to them.
This dichotomy raises an important question: how do we react when our democracy is being dismantled? Do we retreat into passivity or engage with politics? Often, these impulses coexist in people, especially when faced with something as provocative and exhausting as hard-right populism. Some may adopt a "wait and see" approach, while others will take action to resist the regime.
A recent protest in Beverly Hills, California, was a striking example of this divide. Thousands of people marched against Trump's policies, carrying witty anti-Trump placards and chanting slogans. The event was uplifting, with politics coming alive for many participants. However, in San Francisco, the response is more jaded. Many people view Trump's regime as a malign fact of life, something to be endured rather than actively resisted.
The challenge ahead is creating an equally relentless and compelling movement to resist rightwing populism. Unless populism's opponents can draw in those who are victimised and scared into silence, this age of autocrats will carry on. The US and Britain are already facing this reality, with Reform UK promising a Trump-style deconstruction of Whitehall if they win power.
The key is not just to sporadically resist or express contempt for the regime but to create an equally powerful movement that draws in more people and inspires them to take action. Anything less will allow authoritarianism to prevail.