White House Slams Bruce Springsteen's Protest Song as 'Random' and 'Irrelevant', but Critics Say Otherwise
The White House has dismissed Bruce Springsteen's protest song against ICE, labeling it "random" and "irrelevant", in a move that many are seeing as tone-deaf given the growing concerns over the agency's actions.
Springsteen released the song, titled "Streets of Minneapolis", in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis, specifically the killing of two U.S. citizens by ICE officers. The lyrics condemn lies spread by Trump henchmen and express support for the people of Minneapolis, as well as their immigrant neighbors.
The White House's Abigail Jackson claimed that the administration is focused on removing "dangerous criminal illegal aliens" from communities, rather than responding to Springsteen's song. However, critics say this response rings hollow, particularly given the reported efforts by Democrats and Republicans alike to work with the Trump administration on issues related to ICE.
It appears that it's actually Jackson who is displaying a sense of irrelevance, refusing to engage with the message of the song or acknowledge the human impact of her agency's actions. Meanwhile, Springsteen's words have resonated with many, garnering millions of views on YouTube in just a short time since its release.
As more protest songs emerge from artists like NOFX and My Morning Jacket, it seems that the White House is fighting an uphill battle to dismiss the growing chorus of dissent over ICE's actions. The question remains: will Jackson and her administration take steps to address these concerns, or will they continue to label those speaking out as "random" and "irrelevant"?
The White House has dismissed Bruce Springsteen's protest song against ICE, labeling it "random" and "irrelevant", in a move that many are seeing as tone-deaf given the growing concerns over the agency's actions.
Springsteen released the song, titled "Streets of Minneapolis", in response to the state terror being visited on the city of Minneapolis, specifically the killing of two U.S. citizens by ICE officers. The lyrics condemn lies spread by Trump henchmen and express support for the people of Minneapolis, as well as their immigrant neighbors.
The White House's Abigail Jackson claimed that the administration is focused on removing "dangerous criminal illegal aliens" from communities, rather than responding to Springsteen's song. However, critics say this response rings hollow, particularly given the reported efforts by Democrats and Republicans alike to work with the Trump administration on issues related to ICE.
It appears that it's actually Jackson who is displaying a sense of irrelevance, refusing to engage with the message of the song or acknowledge the human impact of her agency's actions. Meanwhile, Springsteen's words have resonated with many, garnering millions of views on YouTube in just a short time since its release.
As more protest songs emerge from artists like NOFX and My Morning Jacket, it seems that the White House is fighting an uphill battle to dismiss the growing chorus of dissent over ICE's actions. The question remains: will Jackson and her administration take steps to address these concerns, or will they continue to label those speaking out as "random" and "irrelevant"?