Labour Party Leader Keir Starmer has been facing a barrage of personal abuse from critics, with many comparing the experience to that faced by football managers subjected to verbal abuse on the pitch. However, according to some, this is not entirely Starmer's fault.
Jonathan Liew, a Guardian journalist, has suggested that Starmer bears some responsibility for the situation, implying that his leadership style and lack of charisma are part of the problem. However, many others have disputed this view, arguing that the abuse directed at Starmer is often driven by more sinister forces.
Desmond Hewitt, a Labour Party member since the days of Hugh Gaitskell, points out that those who print and distribute anti-Starmer stickers and messages are not typically sympathetic to his policies or ideas. "Jonathan has fallen for propaganda from the government's opponents," he writes.
Meanwhile, Robert Dimmick notes that Starmer is a working-class lad with no illusions about power realities in society, who has made a success of himself through hard work and compromise. This approach, he suggests, has earned him criticism from both the populist right and some on the left.
Not everyone has been so sympathetic to Starmer, however. Gethyn Edmunds, a great admirer of Liew's work, found his recent article deeply disappointing, arguing that the abuse directed at Starmer is not relevant to the serious business of politics.
Meanwhile, Ralph Jones reported seeing posters in a prosperous Kent village that seemed to reflect a level of approval for the kind of abuse Starmer has faced. This kind of behavior raises questions about whether we are losing our sense of civility and respect for those who lead us.
In the end, it is clear that Keir Starmer's unpopularity has been driven by a range of factors, from his leadership style to government policy failures. However, as Desmond Hewitt notes, it is also possible to understand why some people might direct abuse at him - even if we do not agree with their views or methods.
Jonathan Liew, a Guardian journalist, has suggested that Starmer bears some responsibility for the situation, implying that his leadership style and lack of charisma are part of the problem. However, many others have disputed this view, arguing that the abuse directed at Starmer is often driven by more sinister forces.
Desmond Hewitt, a Labour Party member since the days of Hugh Gaitskell, points out that those who print and distribute anti-Starmer stickers and messages are not typically sympathetic to his policies or ideas. "Jonathan has fallen for propaganda from the government's opponents," he writes.
Meanwhile, Robert Dimmick notes that Starmer is a working-class lad with no illusions about power realities in society, who has made a success of himself through hard work and compromise. This approach, he suggests, has earned him criticism from both the populist right and some on the left.
Not everyone has been so sympathetic to Starmer, however. Gethyn Edmunds, a great admirer of Liew's work, found his recent article deeply disappointing, arguing that the abuse directed at Starmer is not relevant to the serious business of politics.
Meanwhile, Ralph Jones reported seeing posters in a prosperous Kent village that seemed to reflect a level of approval for the kind of abuse Starmer has faced. This kind of behavior raises questions about whether we are losing our sense of civility and respect for those who lead us.
In the end, it is clear that Keir Starmer's unpopularity has been driven by a range of factors, from his leadership style to government policy failures. However, as Desmond Hewitt notes, it is also possible to understand why some people might direct abuse at him - even if we do not agree with their views or methods.