Labour's promise of decent private rented homes in England is a decade away from becoming a reality. Landlords are given until 2035 to implement "robust standards" that combat disrepair, damp, and energy inefficiency. The timeline has been met with criticism from campaigners who describe it as "absurd", stating that millions of renters will be stuck living in poor-quality homes for nearly a decade.
The decision comes as the government publishes plans for a reformed decent homes standard (DHS) for social rented homes, alongside an introduction to DHS for the private rented sector. The housing minister, Matthew Pennycook, argues that the timeline will allow social landlords to boost housing supply and drive up the quality of their properties.
However, critics say the delay is unacceptable, with one organisation describing it as a "disgrace". Ben Twomey, chief executive of Generation Rent, said: "It's absurd to let landlords drag their feet for an entire decade. It will mean millions of renters trapped living in poor-quality homes."
The campaign group had pushed for an earlier deadline, but the government has stuck with 2035. Paula Barker, Labour MP for Liverpool Wavertree, condemned the decision as a "shameful and completely unacceptable" move that will leave families and children stuck in substandard housing.
Data from the English Housing Survey shows that 21% of privately rented homes fail to meet the existing decent homes standard, with many more deemed non-decent due to disrepair or energy issues. The Health Foundation estimates that one in five private rented homes are classed as non-decent, posing a significant threat to health.
The new DHS will require landlords to ensure their properties meet certain standards, including being free of hazards and damp, and equipped with facilities like noise insulation and child-resistant window restrictors. Shelter's chief executive, Sarah Elliott, described the delay as "outrageous", stating that renters cannot afford to wait for a decade for basic protection.
The government has defended its decision, arguing that it will allow landlords time to implement changes while supporting councils in enforcing existing regulations. However, critics argue that this is just a smokescreen and that the real issue is the lack of urgency from the government.
The decision comes as the government publishes plans for a reformed decent homes standard (DHS) for social rented homes, alongside an introduction to DHS for the private rented sector. The housing minister, Matthew Pennycook, argues that the timeline will allow social landlords to boost housing supply and drive up the quality of their properties.
However, critics say the delay is unacceptable, with one organisation describing it as a "disgrace". Ben Twomey, chief executive of Generation Rent, said: "It's absurd to let landlords drag their feet for an entire decade. It will mean millions of renters trapped living in poor-quality homes."
The campaign group had pushed for an earlier deadline, but the government has stuck with 2035. Paula Barker, Labour MP for Liverpool Wavertree, condemned the decision as a "shameful and completely unacceptable" move that will leave families and children stuck in substandard housing.
Data from the English Housing Survey shows that 21% of privately rented homes fail to meet the existing decent homes standard, with many more deemed non-decent due to disrepair or energy issues. The Health Foundation estimates that one in five private rented homes are classed as non-decent, posing a significant threat to health.
The new DHS will require landlords to ensure their properties meet certain standards, including being free of hazards and damp, and equipped with facilities like noise insulation and child-resistant window restrictors. Shelter's chief executive, Sarah Elliott, described the delay as "outrageous", stating that renters cannot afford to wait for a decade for basic protection.
The government has defended its decision, arguing that it will allow landlords time to implement changes while supporting councils in enforcing existing regulations. However, critics argue that this is just a smokescreen and that the real issue is the lack of urgency from the government.