AI tools fail at most real-world jobs, but workers still fear being replaced

While many Americans fear that AI is coming for their jobs, a recent study suggests that these tools still have a long way to go before they can automate real-world jobs. Researchers tested various AI models on hundreds of freelance projects and found that only one system, Manus, was able to complete about 2.5% of the jobs successfully.

The study's findings contradict some economists' claims that AI will revolutionize the workforce. According to Ioana Marinescu and Konrad Kording, two researchers who developed an interactive model to understand this dichotomy, "AI isn't really being deployed in the physical sector." This suggests that AI's impact on the economy is limited by its inability to automate jobs in industries such as construction and healthcare.

However, the study also highlights areas where AI excels. For example, AI can handle routine tasks such as translating subtitles for TV shows and creating social media posts with ease. But when it comes to handling more complex and outside-the-box cases, like customer service and writing personalized emails, AI still has a long way to go.

The ability to effectively use AI is becoming increasingly important in the job market. There are currently over 10,815 job postings in the Philadelphia area that require AI skills, ranking it 14th among US cities.

Not everyone is optimistic about the impact of AI on the workforce. Sorelle Friedler, a professor of computer science at Haverford College, believes that AI can be used to augment human capabilities, but it's not yet ready to replace humans in many roles. "It's one thing to say, 'Oh, in theory, could AI do your job?' Yes, maybe it can do part of it, but if you can't cover that last mile, it can still be hard to deploy."

The study also found that when workers use AI tools on mundane tasks, they experience a decline in intrinsic motivation and an increase in boredom. However, some organizations are successfully implementing AI to automate routine tasks, such as the Veterans Affairs agency's use of AI to process disability claims.

As AI continues to evolve, researchers emphasize the importance of understanding its full potential and preparing for its impact on the workforce. "AI is here to stay," says Friedler, "and understanding its potential might be the best way to prepare for its effects."
 
omg u no i took a class last yr on ai & machine learning πŸ˜‚πŸ€– and it was SOOO much harder than i thought it would b!!! i mean, i'm not saying i failed or anythin but idk how those researchers in the study managed to get only 2.5% of jobs right lol. anyway, i think its cool that ai is good at doing routine tasks like subtitles & social media posts πŸ“ΊπŸ“±, but like, customer service & writin emails is a whole different story πŸ˜‚. and omg, did u know theres over 10k job postings in philly alone that require ai skills? πŸ’ΌπŸ€― i think its crazy how fast ai is changin the workforce tho. we need to prepare ourselves for this new tech or else we'll be left behind πŸš€πŸ’»
 
I'm not sure I completely buy into the whole AI takeover narrative πŸ€–. I mean, yeah, it's cool that some freelance projects were able to get done with AI models, but 2.5% is still a pretty small number, right? It feels like people are glossing over all the ways in which AI just can't do human jobs yet πŸ’Ό.

I think what really interests me is how AI affects our motivation at work πŸ€”. I mean, if you're relying on machines to do most of the work, aren't you kind of... bored? 😴 It's not exactly a reason to get excited about the future of work, but it does make you wonder if we need to rethink what we mean by "work" altogether 🀯.

But hey, at least AI is good for some things, right? Like making subtitles for TV shows or creating social media posts πŸ“Ί. That's pretty cool stuff πŸ’».
 
πŸ€” I feel like we're still in a bit of limbo when it comes to AI - it's super powerful but can't quite get everything right yet πŸš€. The fact that only one system was able to complete 2.5% of the jobs is crazy 😲! It's all about finding that balance between using AI for routine tasks and actually having humans with skills and empathy πŸ’‘. I mean, think about it - AI can handle subtitling subtitles but writing a personalized email still requires some human touch πŸ“. We need to focus on developing those skills so we don't get left behind 🚫.
 
I'm so done with all this AI hype πŸ˜’... like seriously, can we just take a step back and acknowledge that it's not that cool? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ The fact that only 2.5% of these jobs were even completed successfully is wild - I mean, what does that say about the 'revolution' everyone's been talking about? 🚫 It's like, yeah sure AI can do some stuff, but it's not ready to replace us just yet... or ever, for that matter.

And don't even get me started on how boring it is to watch machines do mundane tasks 😴. I mean, come on, if I'm gonna be replaced by a robot, at least make it interesting! πŸ”₯ The whole 'augmenting human capabilities' thing sounds like a bunch of corporate speak to me πŸ“£... what does that even mean in practice? Can we just have some honest conversations about what's going on here?

And seriously, have you seen those job postings for AI skills? πŸ’Ό Like 10,815 and counting? That's not 'innovation', that's just a bunch of companies trying to sound cool πŸ€–. What does it mean when everyone's basically begging to be replaced by a machine? πŸ€” It's like we're all just waiting around for the AI apocalypse or something... πŸ˜‚
 
πŸ€” AI is literally still in its diapers... I mean, it's not even close to being able to take over the world just yet. Like, who needs humans on customer service anyway? πŸ™„ And don't even get me started on those job postings that require AI skills - are they really expecting people to automate their entire lives away? 😴 It's all about augmentation, folks... not replacement. So, yeah, let's just take a deep breath and acknowledge that AI is still a tool, not a savior. And can we please talk about the state of disability claims processing? πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ At least the VA is trying something right.
 
omg this study is so cool! πŸ€– I'm not surprised that AI still has a long way to go before it can automate real-world jobs tho...I mean we're talking about complex stuff here like customer service and writing personalized emails, those are hard skills to replicate πŸ“. but at the same time, AI excelling in routine tasks is def a game changer! πŸš€ I'm loving that there are so many job postings requiring AI skills in Philly right now πŸ’Ό it's crazy how fast this tech is advancing. Sorelle Friedler makes some really good points about augmenting human capabilities rather than replacing them, tbh 🀝
 
I'm still not convinced about all these new AI tools... πŸ€” I mean, 2.5% success rate? That's pretty weak if you ask me 😐. I've seen those language translation tools on social media, and they're only good for basic stuff. Can't even translate idioms or sarcasm properly πŸ™„. And don't even get me started on chatbots - they sound so smart at first but then just spew out generic responses that are totally unhelpful πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. What's the point of having AI if it can't even handle real conversations? πŸ˜•
 
I'm tellin' ya, AI is still in that infancy stage πŸ€–! I mean, sure, it's got some skills, but can it actually do a real job? Not so much. They tested these AI models on all these freelance projects and only one of 'em came out on top, and even then, it was like 2.5% success rate! That's not exactly the revolution we were told to expect πŸ€”.

And don't even get me started on construction and healthcare – those are like, essential jobs that need human touch, you know? AI might be able to do some stuff in these areas, but it's still a long way off. And what about all the jobs that require creativity and problem-solving skills? AI can barely handle customer service, let alone write personalized emails πŸ“§.

Now, I'm not saying AI is bad or anything, but we need to be realistic here. It's like my grandma used to say: "You can't replace a human heart with a machine." And besides, all these job postings in Philly that require AI skills? That just means people are getting paid to play with machines, if you ask me πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ.

The study says we need to prepare for AI's impact on the workforce, but I think it's already here. It's like a big ol' elephant in the room – we can't ignore it no more 🐘.
 
I'm a bit surprised by this study πŸ€”... I mean, yeah, AI's still not that great at doing all our jobs. It can handle some routine stuff, like translating subtitles or creating social media posts, but when it comes to dealing with customers or writing personalized emails, it just isn't there yet 🚫

But you know what really caught my attention? The fact that we're already needing AI skills in so many job postings πŸ“ˆ... I mean, over 10,000 jobs in Philly alone! That's a huge shift. And it makes sense - if machines can handle the boring stuff, humans can focus on more creative and challenging work.

It's also interesting to see how some organizations are already using AI to automate routine tasks and freeing up workers for more important things πŸ’Ό... like customer service or writing personalized emails (which, as I said, AI still struggles with).

I guess what this study is saying is that we need to be careful about how much we rely on AI and make sure we're preparing our workforce for the changes ahead 🀝.
 
I'm telling you, it's so important that we don't put all our eggs in one basket when it comes to AI πŸ€–πŸš€. People are super worried that it's gonna replace them and take their jobs away, but honestly, it's not that simple πŸ˜…. I mean, sure, some tasks can be done easily by machines like translating subtitles or creating social media posts, but others? Not so much πŸ€”.

It's all about understanding what AI is good at and what humans are good at, you know? πŸ’‘ Like, let's use AI to help with the boring stuff, but also make sure we're developing our skills in areas where machines can't compete yet πŸ“ˆ. And honestly, it's kinda cool that there are already 10,815 job postings in Philly alone that require AI skills - it just means we need to be more proactive about learning and adapting πŸ’».

And I love what Sorelle Friedler said about AI being able to augment human capabilities, but not yet replace us πŸ™Œ. It's like, we're not gonna be redundant with machines, we'll just be getting a little help along the way 😊. So, let's all breathe a sigh of relief and get on board with this whole AI thing - it's here to stay! πŸš€
 
Back
Top