April 3, 2023 Trump indictment news | CNN Politics

Lawyers for former US President Donald Trump have told a New York judge that they oppose requests by media outlets to broadcast his arraignment on Tuesday, citing concerns about creating a "circus-like atmosphere" and security risks.

In a letter to New York Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchant, the Trump team argued that allowing video or photography of the proceedings would heighten these concerns. Todd Blanche, one of the lawyers signing the new letter, recently joined the former president's legal team.

The Manhattan District Attorney's office has also responded to media requests, saying it is deferring to the judge to decide how best to manage the courtroom. However, prosecutors noted that there does not appear to be a categorical prohibition on cameras during an arraignment under existing New York statutes and case law.

A similar request was made for Trump's 2021 arraignment in a tax fraud case against his Organization and CFO Allen Weisselberg. The judge responded by allowing a limited number of still photographs to be taken before proceedings began.

The CNN news organization is among the outlets requesting camera access for Tuesday's arraignment, but it is unclear whether the request will be approved.
 
I'm not buying this "circus-like atmosphere" excuse... ๐Ÿค” Like how can a bunch of cameras and reporters really make things chaotic in a courtroom? And what about transparency? Shouldn't we be able to see our leaders being arraigned for serious crimes? The fact that they're trying to block video and photography just makes me think there's something they don't want us to see... ๐Ÿ“บ Source? What's the real concern here?

And btw, how come this is different from Trump's previous arraignment in 2021? If it was okay back then for a limited number of still photos, why not video and cameras now? Is there some new reason they're trying to block them this time around? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” you know what's weird? how some people are so curious about what others do in private life... like, don't get me wrong, it's interesting to watch a big figure like trump walk into court and all, but isn't that kinda like sticking your nose into someone else's business? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ my friend's cousin's brother-in-law is actually really good at photography tho! have you guys seen those cool street photography books on instagram?
 
๐Ÿค” "A house divided against itself cannot stand." ๐Ÿ ๏ธ I think this whole thing about Trump's arraignment is a perfect example of that quote. Everyone's got an opinion on it, and now it seems like everyone wants to watch or at least hear about it live. Maybe we should all just calm down and let the justice system do its thing? โš–๏ธ
 
I'm low-key surprised the Trump team is being so cautious about cameras at his arraignment ๐Ÿค”. I mean, isn't this like, a big deal? The guy's going down and you're worried about creating a circus atmosphere? Like, he's been in the spotlight for years, what's one more dramatic moment gonna hurt anyone? ๐Ÿ˜‚ But I guess when you've got an army of lawyers and PR people on your side, it's natural to want control over every aspect of your public image. Still think it's kinda weird that they're trying to keep the cameras out tho...
 
Ugh, I just got back from the most amazing road trip with my family ๐Ÿš—๐ŸŒ„ and we saw the most gorgeous sunsets over the mountains. Reminds me of how stunning nature can be and how we're all just tiny humans trying to navigate our way through life ๐Ÿคฃ. Anyway, back to this Trump thing... I mean, I don't really know what's going on with his arraignment, but it sounds like a real media circus ๐ŸŽช. Can you imagine walking into a courtroom and seeing every single journalist there live tweeting every. single. detail? ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ˜ณ. No wonder they're trying to keep it under wraps... or should I say, under the bubble ๐Ÿ˜‚.
 
im not surprised about this lol ๐Ÿคฃ they r always so dramatic in law firms anyway! i mean whats the big deal bout a lil live feed? its all good imo ๐Ÿ‘Œ
 
๐Ÿค” So I'm wondering if anyone else would have been down with seeing Trump's arraignment live on TV? I mean, it's a big deal, right? But at the same time, I get why the lawyers don't want to create a "circus-like atmosphere"... like, can you imagine all those cameras and reporters in the courtroom? ๐Ÿ“ธ It's probably for the best that they're keeping things low-key.

I'm also curious, do you think it would've changed your opinion of Trump if you saw him get arraigned live on TV? Would it have reinforced what you already believe about him or maybe made you even more skeptical? ๐Ÿค
 
can't believe they're gonna keep trump under wraps ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ like that's ever stopped him from tweeting about anything! security risks or not, i think it's super public interest to see how the mannequin is doing in real life ๐Ÿ˜. media outlets should be able to get a glimpse of what's going down in that courtroom. the public has a right to know ๐Ÿ“บ.
 
Omg ๐Ÿคฏ Trump's team is being super cautious about security and circus-like atmosphere ๐Ÿ’ฅ๐ŸŽช during his arraignment on Tuesday ๐Ÿ“†. I get it tho ๐Ÿ˜Š, can't blame them for wanting to avoid any drama or potential harm ๐Ÿ’”. But at the same time, media outlets wanna get the scoop ๐Ÿ” and cameras are a major part of that ๐Ÿ“บ. It's like a big puzzle ๐Ÿงฉ and we'll just have to wait and see how it all plays out ๐Ÿค”. Maybe we'll even get some exclusive pics ๐Ÿ“ธ or vids ๐ŸŽฅ? Fingers crossed ๐Ÿคž!
 
Back
Top