French court set to decide if cement giant Lafarge funded terrorism in Syria. A high-profile trial is underway in France, with Lafarge facing allegations of paying millions of dollars in "protection money" to the Islamic State and other jihadist groups operating in war-torn Syria.
The company, which has since been acquired by Swiss conglomerate Holcim, stands accused of using its subsidiary Lafarge Cement Syria (LCS) to grease the palms of extremist groups in exchange for continued access to the country's lucrative construction market. Prosecutors claim that Lafarge paid intermediaries millions of dollars in 2013 and 2014 to keep its factory operating in northern Syria.
The alleged payments were allegedly made to secure access to raw materials from the Islamic State (IS) and other jihadist groups, as well as to facilitate the movement of Lafarge's trucks and employees. The company's former director Bruno Lafont, five ex-employees, and two Syrian intermediaries are among those on trial for their alleged roles in the scheme.
The charges against Lafarge carry significant penalties, including fines of up to $1.2 million if found guilty of "funding terrorism". However, Holcim has insisted that it had no knowledge of the Syria business dealings during its time as Lafarge's parent company.
Lafarge's actions have drawn comparisons with a similar case in the United States, where the company pleaded guilty to conspiring to provide material support to US-designated foreign terrorist organizations and agreed to pay a $778-million fine. The French trial is expected to last until mid-December.
The controversy surrounding Lafarge's involvement in Syria has also highlighted the challenges faced by multinational companies operating in conflict zones. In this case, Lafarge chose to leave its expatriate employees behind but evacuated its Syrian staff after IS seized control of its factory in 2014.
The trial is part of a broader inquiry into Lafarge's alleged complicity with crimes against humanity and has sparked controversy both domestically and internationally.
The company, which has since been acquired by Swiss conglomerate Holcim, stands accused of using its subsidiary Lafarge Cement Syria (LCS) to grease the palms of extremist groups in exchange for continued access to the country's lucrative construction market. Prosecutors claim that Lafarge paid intermediaries millions of dollars in 2013 and 2014 to keep its factory operating in northern Syria.
The alleged payments were allegedly made to secure access to raw materials from the Islamic State (IS) and other jihadist groups, as well as to facilitate the movement of Lafarge's trucks and employees. The company's former director Bruno Lafont, five ex-employees, and two Syrian intermediaries are among those on trial for their alleged roles in the scheme.
The charges against Lafarge carry significant penalties, including fines of up to $1.2 million if found guilty of "funding terrorism". However, Holcim has insisted that it had no knowledge of the Syria business dealings during its time as Lafarge's parent company.
Lafarge's actions have drawn comparisons with a similar case in the United States, where the company pleaded guilty to conspiring to provide material support to US-designated foreign terrorist organizations and agreed to pay a $778-million fine. The French trial is expected to last until mid-December.
The controversy surrounding Lafarge's involvement in Syria has also highlighted the challenges faced by multinational companies operating in conflict zones. In this case, Lafarge chose to leave its expatriate employees behind but evacuated its Syrian staff after IS seized control of its factory in 2014.
The trial is part of a broader inquiry into Lafarge's alleged complicity with crimes against humanity and has sparked controversy both domestically and internationally.
Lafarge just thought it was cool to pay protection money to extremist groups so they could keep working in Syria? Like, what a sick way to do business... Not to mention the human cost - innocent people getting killed or displaced because of some company's greed. The fact that Holcim is denying any knowledge is just red flag after red flag... And $778 million fine in the States for basically the same thing? 
That's not enough. This trial better be serious and hold Lafarge accountable... 
It's got me thinking about the gray areas of international business and how corporations operate in conflict zones... do they have any real say in where they're doing business or are they just following the money trail? 
Can't the justice system work faster than that? 
I just can't believe what's going on here... Lafarge, a major cement company, allegedly paid millions to terrorist groups in Syria? It's like, how can you just bribe your way into doing business in a war zone? 
I'm not surprised that Holcim is denying any knowledge of the scheme, but it's still gotta be super shady. 
What's even more concerning is that this is just one example of multinational companies taking risks by operating in conflict zones without proper accountability.
Like, take a step back and think about the impact your actions are having on people's lives... and countries! 
It's not just about profits; it's about doing what's right. And if you can't do that, then maybe it's time to reevaluate what kind of business you want to be in.
, right? I mean, who wouldn't want to pay millions of dollars in protection money to a group that's more likely to blow up your factory than let you work there? It's like they thought it was a really good business deal... but instead of just paying the terrorists, they also got to give their employees a nice exit strategy 
. And now the French court is all like "uh, nope, that's not how it works" 
.
. I get why the French court has to investigate this, but at the same time, it feels like they're just trying to pin everything on Lafarge when there might be some other players involved too 
.
. It's like, how can we be sure that Lafarge was acting alone? And what about all the other companies that might have been involved in some shady dealings too?
. I mean, you'd think they would've taken care of their employees regardless of what was going on.
. Fingers crossed that justice is served and Lafarge takes responsibility for its actions 
.
. but honestly, how can a company be that clueless about their subsidiary's dealings? it's not like it's some secret operation, it's right there in plain sight.
.