Women continue to fight for their children's custody, despite progress made in recent decades. A book titled "Custody: The Secret History of Mothers" by Lara Feigel delves into the painful experiences of mothers separated from their children, with no clear sense of forward movement.
Lara Feigel's research spans history and fiction, reportage and memoir, but at times struggles to weave these stories together. Her own custody battle is intertwined with that of 19th-century author Caroline Norton, who fought tirelessly for the rights of women over their property and children. While Norton's story offers a glimmer of hope, it also recounts tragedy.
Feigel jumps between different eras, including modern-day America, where celebrities like Britney Spears have been imprisoned in psychiatric hospitals without their children. In these stories, the pain of mothers who've lost custody of their kids is palpable. However, instead of concluding with a hopeful message, Feigel takes the reader back to 2008, showing how little has changed.
The book highlights how women's liberation and children's needs often conflict with patriarchal attitudes and lawyers' arguments. Alice Walker's experience of co-parenting her daughter after divorce serves as an example of this struggle. The author argues that the "curdling of 1960s liberal progress" is evident in these stories.
Feigel ends her book on a note of hope, suggesting we can imagine a future where emancipation and care coexist. However, given the harrowing tales she's shared, such optimism feels fragile and unattainable.
In contemporary courtrooms, Feigel meets women who are fighting for custody, only to be met with indifference from lawyers and a system that seems designed to prioritize adults' interests over children's well-being. The presentation of these stories feels rushed, leaving the reader with a sense of frustration and despair. Despite her best efforts, Feigel's book cannot hide the fact that women still have to fight for their children's custody in a world that often prioritizes patriarchal values above all else.
Lara Feigel's research spans history and fiction, reportage and memoir, but at times struggles to weave these stories together. Her own custody battle is intertwined with that of 19th-century author Caroline Norton, who fought tirelessly for the rights of women over their property and children. While Norton's story offers a glimmer of hope, it also recounts tragedy.
Feigel jumps between different eras, including modern-day America, where celebrities like Britney Spears have been imprisoned in psychiatric hospitals without their children. In these stories, the pain of mothers who've lost custody of their kids is palpable. However, instead of concluding with a hopeful message, Feigel takes the reader back to 2008, showing how little has changed.
The book highlights how women's liberation and children's needs often conflict with patriarchal attitudes and lawyers' arguments. Alice Walker's experience of co-parenting her daughter after divorce serves as an example of this struggle. The author argues that the "curdling of 1960s liberal progress" is evident in these stories.
Feigel ends her book on a note of hope, suggesting we can imagine a future where emancipation and care coexist. However, given the harrowing tales she's shared, such optimism feels fragile and unattainable.
In contemporary courtrooms, Feigel meets women who are fighting for custody, only to be met with indifference from lawyers and a system that seems designed to prioritize adults' interests over children's well-being. The presentation of these stories feels rushed, leaving the reader with a sense of frustration and despair. Despite her best efforts, Feigel's book cannot hide the fact that women still have to fight for their children's custody in a world that often prioritizes patriarchal values above all else.