Drake Files Formal Notice of Appeal in Defamation Lawsuit Against UMG, Vowing to Revisit "Non-Actionable Opinion" on Kendrick Lamar's Grammy-Winning Diss Track.
In a move that sets the stage for an anticipated showdown at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, rapper Drake has formally submitted his notice of appeal following a federal judge's dismissal of his defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) over Kendrick Lamar's Grammy-winning diss track "Not Like Us".
Citing the judge's ruling as a flawed interpretation of fact and context, Drake's team intends to challenge the decision that deemed the lyrics in question - including the infamous line accusing him of being a "certified pedophile" - as non-actionable opinions rather than defamatory statements.
The lawsuit, filed by Drake last January, claimed UMG was aware the track contained false and damaging allegations about his personal life when it released it. The label denied these allegations in its response to the suit, stating that the song's message was meant to be a creative expression and not based on verifiable facts.
However, Judge Jeannette A. Vargas ultimately ruled that UMG was protected by free speech principles and couldn't be held liable for the track's content. Her decision stated that listeners wouldn't interpret "Not Like Us" as fact-checked statements but rather as part of an extended rap battle where artists exchange provocative insults.
In response to the ruling, Drake vowed to appeal immediately. His notice of appeal requests that the Second Circuit Court of Appeals review the case and potentially overturn Judge Vargas' decision. With his team now formally lodging their appeal, it remains to be seen how this drama will unfold in the coming weeks.
In a move that sets the stage for an anticipated showdown at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, rapper Drake has formally submitted his notice of appeal following a federal judge's dismissal of his defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) over Kendrick Lamar's Grammy-winning diss track "Not Like Us".
Citing the judge's ruling as a flawed interpretation of fact and context, Drake's team intends to challenge the decision that deemed the lyrics in question - including the infamous line accusing him of being a "certified pedophile" - as non-actionable opinions rather than defamatory statements.
The lawsuit, filed by Drake last January, claimed UMG was aware the track contained false and damaging allegations about his personal life when it released it. The label denied these allegations in its response to the suit, stating that the song's message was meant to be a creative expression and not based on verifiable facts.
However, Judge Jeannette A. Vargas ultimately ruled that UMG was protected by free speech principles and couldn't be held liable for the track's content. Her decision stated that listeners wouldn't interpret "Not Like Us" as fact-checked statements but rather as part of an extended rap battle where artists exchange provocative insults.
In response to the ruling, Drake vowed to appeal immediately. His notice of appeal requests that the Second Circuit Court of Appeals review the case and potentially overturn Judge Vargas' decision. With his team now formally lodging their appeal, it remains to be seen how this drama will unfold in the coming weeks.