Extremists exploit political 'trigger events' to recruit people online, says study

Extremists are cashing in on high-profile violence by recruiting new followers online and amplifying the use of violence to push their agendas. Researchers at New York University's Stern Center for Business and Human Rights tracked social media feeds after recent attacks, including Charlie Kirk's assassination, and found that violent extremist groups systematically exploit "trigger events" - such as high-profile incidents of violence - to recruit supporters, justify their ideologies, and call for retaliatory action.

The study analyzed over 520 plots and acts of terrorism and targeted violence in the US, which is a nearly 40% increase from last year. The researchers monitored online networks across the political spectrum, including far-right, far-left, violent Islamist, and nihilistic violent extremists. They found that these groups use social media platforms to spread their messages, often using mainstream sites like X before funneling people into private platforms to coordinate further.

The report highlights the rise of "nihilistic" violent extremism, a category used by the FBI to describe attackers who don't fit into standard ideological frames and prioritize violence for its own sake. These groups now use performative shock value as a way to spread their ideology online, often referencing online communities in manifestos or on bullet casings.

"This creates a feedback loop of violence and extremism," said Luke Barnes, senior research scientist at NYU Stern. "Extremist groups will use mainstream sites to spread their messages, then include an outlink to another platform where they can share more extreme content."

The study also found that far-right and far-left networks often converged in spreading narratives about victimhood or celebrating violence. The report makes recommendations for social platforms and US lawmakers, including establishing clear policies on threats and incitement, enabling users to report violations quickly, and recognizing the limits of legal remedies.

Interestingly, Barnes noted that nihilistic violent extremism may actually create opportunities for bipartisanship.
 
man this is wild how these extremist groups are using social media to recruit new followers and spread their ideologies ๐Ÿคฏ they're like a virus spreading online, exploiting trigger events to get people hyped about violence ๐Ÿ‘Š and it's not just one side of the spectrum either, far-right and far-left groups are colliding over victimhood narratives ๐Ÿค what's crazy is that some of these nihilistic groups might actually be creating a space for bipartisanship? wouldn't have thought that'd be possible ๐Ÿ˜‚
 
I'm getting so tired of these extremist groups cashing in on violence ๐Ÿคฏ. It's like they're trying to profit off people's suffering. I mean, who does that? The fact that they're using social media platforms to spread their ideology and recruit new followers is just mind-boggling. And the study found out that these groups are actually creating this "feedback loop" of violence and extremism - it's like a never-ending cycle ๐Ÿ’”.

I'm also kinda curious about this "nihilistic" violent extremism thing... sounds like they're not even tied to any specific ideology, just pure chaos ๐Ÿ˜ฑ. And the fact that mainstream sites are getting exploited is just crazy. Can't we just get rid of these platforms for good?
 
๐Ÿค” I think its wild how extremist groups are milking these high-profile violence incidents to get new followers online ๐Ÿ“Š They're like, super strategic about it too - they use mainstream sites to spread their message, then funnel people into private platforms where they can get more extreme stuff ๐Ÿšจ. It's like a game of cat and mouse, with social media platforms being the stage ๐ŸŽญ. And what's crazy is that some groups are even using performative shock value to spread their ideology online - it's like they're trying to get a reaction from people ๐Ÿ˜ฌ.

But here's the thing: I think this whole situation could be an opportunity for bipartisanship ๐Ÿ’ก, as Luke Barnes mentioned ๐Ÿ™Œ. If we can figure out ways to tackle this nihilistic violent extremism without making things worse, we might actually create some common ground between the left and right ๐Ÿค. We need to stay vigilant and keep an eye on these groups, but also think about how we can work together to prevent more violence ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’•
 
I mean, can you believe these extremist groups are just cashing in on all this violence? ๐Ÿคฏ Like, what's wrong with people? They're using these high-profile attacks to recruit new followers online and spread their sick ideologies... it's just so messed up ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. And the fact that they're using mainstream sites like X before funnelling people into private platforms is just genius (not really) - I mean, who needs nuance when you can just create a nice big feedback loop of violence and extremism? ๐Ÿšจ Anyway, it's clear that these groups are always one step ahead of us, but what's crazy is that the researchers found that nihilistic violent extremism might actually create opportunities for bipartisanship... yeah, because nothing says "bipartisanship" like a bunch of people who just want to cause chaos and destruction ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. And can we talk about how easy it is for these groups to spread their messages online? Like, seriously, how many of us have fallen down the rabbit hole and ended up sharing some extremist content without even realizing it? ๐Ÿ˜ณ It's just crazy...
 
๐Ÿค” so its kinda crazy how these extremist groups are using high-profile violence to recruit new followers online... like they're profiting off people's trauma ๐Ÿค‘. and whats even crazier is that theyre using social media platforms to spread their ideologies, often on mainstream sites before funnelling people into private platforms ๐Ÿ”’.

i think its really interesting how researchers found these "trigger events" - like high-profile incidents of violence - are being exploited by extremist groups to recruit new members. and the fact that far-right and left networks are converging in spreading narratives about victimhood or celebrating violence is just wild ๐Ÿคฏ.

but what i find most insightful is that some experts think nihilistic violent extremism might actually create opportunities for bipartisanship ๐Ÿ‘ฅ. like, imagine if both sides could come together to address the root causes of this violence and prevent it from happening in the first place. its a pretty radical idea, but idk... maybe its time we rethink our approach to dealing with extremism ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿคฏ just saw this study from NYU Stern and its kinda wild how these extremsts are cashing in on violence ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’ธ online, using "trigger events" to recruit new followers ๐Ÿš€ and spread their ideologies ๐Ÿ’”. Like, they're exploiting mainstream sites like X before funnelling people into private platforms ๐Ÿค. It's crazy how these groups use shock value to spread their message online, referencing online communities in manifestos or on bullet casings ๐Ÿ“.

And the rise of nihilistic violent extremism is really interesting ๐Ÿค”. These groups don't fit into standard ideological frames and just prioritize violence for its own sake ๐Ÿ˜ฑ. But what's wild is that Luke Barnes from NYU Stern says that this might actually create opportunities for bipartisanship ๐Ÿค? Like, isn't that a contradiction in terms or something? ๐Ÿคฏ
 
I'm super skeptical about this whole "performative shock value" thing ๐Ÿค”. I mean, if these extremist groups are using online platforms to spread their ideology and then pushing it even further into the dark web, isn't that just a recipe for more extremism? And what's with the idea that they're actually creating a feedback loop of violence and extremism? It sounds like we're just perpetuating a cycle of hate and fear ๐Ÿšซ. I don't want to be a party pooper, but can't we just stop sharing their content altogether? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
Man I'm so worried about this ๐Ÿค•... these extremist groups are like vampires - they thrive on violence & hate ๐Ÿ’”. They're always looking for ways to exploit people's emotions & anger, & it's so sad that we live in a world where they can do just that online ๐ŸŒ.

I think what's really disturbing is how they're using social media to spread their ideologies & recruit new followers ๐Ÿ“ฑ. It's like they have a team of expert manipulators who know exactly which buttons to press to get people riled up & on board with their twisted agendas ๐Ÿ’ฅ.

And yeah, the fact that nihilistic violent extremism is on the rise is really concerning ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. I mean, what kind of sick individual would prioritize violence just for its own sake? ๐Ÿคฏ It's like they're creating a culture of hate & intolerance online, & it's up to us as responsible citizens to speak out against it ๐Ÿ’ช.

I'm all for social media platforms taking responsibility for policing their content & making sure that users aren't promoting hatred or violence ๐Ÿšซ. And I think lawmakers should be doing more to support these efforts too ๐Ÿ™Œ. We need to create a culture of empathy & understanding online, not one that fosters hate & extremism ๐Ÿ’•.
 
๐Ÿ’ฅ "The greatest sign of success for a teacher is to be able to say the people have come back to love through what you have taught them." ๐Ÿ“š - Bob Marley (not related to this topic tho ๐Ÿ˜‚) But seriously, how can social media platforms balance free speech with protecting users from hate speech and extremism? It's like trying to catch a slippery fish... ๐ŸŸ
 
๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ so basically these extremist groups are just exploiting violence like it's a never-ending supply of clicks and followers... I mean, who wouldn't want to join a group that gets all the attention with a high-profile assassination? ๐Ÿ“บ And yeah, it makes total sense that they'd use mainstream sites like X to spread their message before funnelling people into private platforms where things get really extreme ๐Ÿ˜‚. Like, what's next? Creating a social media platform just for sharing manifestos and bullet casings... that's just good business sense ๐Ÿค‘.
 
ugh, this is getting outta hand ๐Ÿคฏ... social media companies need to do better than just monitoring hate speech - they gotta take down the propaganda machines ๐Ÿ’ป these groups are masters of manipulation, using shock value and performative outrage to spread their toxic ideologies online. it's like they're creating a feedback loop of violence and extremism, and it's terrifying ๐Ÿ˜ฑ we can't just sit back and let them win... we need stronger policies in place to keep users safe and stop the spread of hate. and yeah, maybe nihilistic violent extremism is a thing, but that doesn't mean we should be celebrating its "opportunities" for bipartisanship ๐Ÿ™„ it's like, no, let's just get rid of extremism altogether ๐Ÿ’ฏ
 
๐Ÿ˜• I'm really worried about this. These extremist groups are super smart at using social media to spread hate and recruit new followers after big attacks happen. It's like they're playing a sick game of "before" and "after" - one day they're all sad and upset, the next day they're calling for more violence and recruiting new people to join their cause. ๐Ÿคฏ And it's not just limited to one side, either... the far-right and far-left are teaming up to spread this hate stuff online. It's like a toxic snowball effect that's hard to stop once it starts rolling downhill ๐ŸŒจ๏ธ. The fact that these groups can use mainstream sites before sending people to more extreme platforms is just crazy - it's like they're exploiting the whole social media thing for their own gain ๐Ÿ’ธ. We need some serious change, like better policies on social media and a way to report this stuff quickly ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค• social media platforms gotta step up their game! these extremist groups are literally cashing in on people's fears and senseless violence. it's like they're exploiting online spaces to spread hate and recruit new followers... ๐Ÿšซ 520 plots of terrorism is a crazy number, and the fact that there's been a nearly 40% increase from last year is super concerning ๐Ÿ“‰. these groups are using social media to justify their ideologies and call for more violence - it's like they're creating this toxic feedback loop that's hard to break ๐Ÿ’ฅ
 
๐Ÿค” I think its so crazy how these extremists are using violence to recruit new followers online... its like they're trying to make a big impact ๐ŸŒช๏ธ. And the fact that researchers found a nearly 40% increase in plots and acts of terrorism this year is just wild ๐Ÿšจ. I mean, who would have thought that something as shocking as Charlie Kirk's assassination would be used as a way to spread their ideology online? ๐Ÿ˜ฑ. It makes sense that these groups are using mainstream sites like X to get the word out before funnelling people into private platforms to coordinate further... its like they're trying to create this whole online echo chamber ๐Ÿ“ข.
 
๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ Can you believe it? Extremists are just like little kids trying to get a reaction out of people online. They're always looking for the next big thing to stir up some drama and attention ๐Ÿ“บ. And honestly, who needs that kind of negativity in our lives? It's like they think violence is the ultimate form of entertainment... and we're all just their unwitting audience ๐Ÿ‘€.

I mean, come on, these groups are using social media platforms as a way to spread their twisted ideologies and recruit new members ๐Ÿค–. And then they have the nerve to say that nihilistic violent extremism can bring people together? ๐Ÿ˜‚ Please, it's like trying to unite a bunch of cats in a room with no catnip... not gonna happen ๐Ÿˆ.

It's time for social media platforms to take responsibility and do something about this toxic behavior ๐Ÿ’ฏ. We need clear policies on threats and incitement, and users should be able to report violations quickly ๐Ÿ‘. Let's not forget that we're all in this together ๐Ÿค.
 
Back
Top