Federal judge hears arguments on Minnesota's immigration crackdown after fatal shootings

A federal court judge has heard arguments on Minnesota's challenge to the Trump administration's immigration enforcement crackdown that led to two fatal shootings by federal officers. U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez is considering whether to grant requests by the state and cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul to temporarily halt the operation.

Lawyers for the state and Twin Cities argued that the situation on the streets has become dire, requiring a court order to stop the federal government's enforcement actions. Minnesota Assistant Attorney General Brian Carter stated that if this is not stopped immediately, "I don't think anybody who is seriously looking at this problem can have much faith in how our republic is going to go in the future."

In contrast, the Justice Department's lawyers claimed that the lawsuit was "legally frivolous" and argued that Minnesota wants a veto over federal law enforcement. They asked the judge to reject the request or stay her order pending an anticipated appeal.

Judge Menendez questioned the government's motivation behind the crackdown, expressing skepticism about a letter sent by Attorney General Pam Bondi to Governor Tim Walz. She expressed concern about the line between violating the Constitution and the executive's power to enforce immigration law.

The case has significant implications for other states that may become targets of increased federal immigration enforcement operations. A group of 20 attorneys general from across the country, including California, have filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Minnesota.

In another development, President Donald Trump announced that he would send border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota. The president's statement comes after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino answered questions about Pretti's shooting.
 
I'm still wondering how a group of 20 AGs from across the country got together to support a single state like this ๐Ÿค”. Like, what's the point of a friend-of-the-court brief if you're not gonna get any real traction on this issue? ๐Ÿ˜ And now that Trump is sending some low-level dude Tom Homan to Minnesota, I'm pretty sure nothing's gonna change... meanwhile, the situation is still getting more dire by the day ๐Ÿšจ. Hasn't anyone thought about how this crackdown could be a major setback for US values of fairness and equality? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
I gotta say, this whole thing with the federal court judge hearing arguments on the immigration crackdown in Minnesota is wild ๐Ÿคฏ. I'm all for states having a say in how their laws are enforced, but at the same time, you gotta wonder what's driving the government to take such drastic measures. Like, I get that immigration is a big deal, but do we really need the feds cracking down like this? It feels like there's a lot of politics going on here and not a whole lot of facts being considered ๐Ÿค”.

And can we talk about President Trump for a sec? Sending his border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota seems like just another move to stir up drama and distract from the real issues at hand ๐Ÿ’ธ. I mean, what's next? Sending in more troops or something?! It's all just a big mess ๐Ÿšฎ.

I'm not saying the state of Minnesota is right or wrong here, but can we have a more nuanced conversation about this stuff? We need to stop pitting states against each other and start talking about how we can work together to fix our broken immigration system ๐Ÿค.
 
omg is this really happening in the US?? I'm literally shook thinking about people getting shot by federal officers like what's going on with that ๐Ÿคฏ... I mean I kinda get why they're trying to do something, but two fatalities is just crazy... I wonder if it's true that some of these states are gonna start doing things because they don't trust the feds ๐Ÿ‘€... and why did Trump send his border guy to Minnesota? like isn't that just gonna make things worse? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
OMG, can you even imagine having to live in a state where the cops are actively targeting people on the streets? ๐Ÿคฏ Like, what's next? They're gonna start enforcing laws on who you sleep with or something?! The fact that there are 20 AGs from other states coming together to support Minnesota is kinda cool, though. It shows they know how serious this situation is... and honestly, I think it's a total abuse of power by the feds ๐Ÿšซ
 
idk how much more of this crap can minnesota take ๐Ÿคฏ the feds are just gonna keep pushing it, no matter what judge says... meanwhile trump is all "oh look i'm being a hero" by sending tom homan to minny lol like that's gonna change anything ๐Ÿ™„. and what's up with pam bondi's letter? seems like a total waste of her time trying to cover her own backside ๐Ÿค”. the fact that california and 19 other attorneys general are backing minnesota just shows how out of touch trump is ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. this whole thing is just gonna be a huge mess, can't wait to see what happens next ๐Ÿ˜…
 
๐Ÿค” the fed gov is basically saying they dont care about public safety if it means enforcing immigration laws... thats not how a republic works, we gotta have some balance between state rights and federal power ๐Ÿšซ meanwhile, i wonder what's gonna happen to the ppl who got caught in the crossfire... ๐Ÿ’€ these lawyers are just spouting off about "our republic" but who's really looking out for us? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ This is getting good... a federal court judge questioning the government's motivation behind an immigration crackdown that resulted in two fatal shootings? It's like they're expecting answers from the Department of Justice on why they chose to send in the cavalry with guns blazing ๐Ÿ˜’. And now we've got President Trump sending his border czar, Tom Homan, to Minnesota because that's exactly what you do when you want to defuse a situation - send the guy with the big stick ๐Ÿคช. I'm surprised California hasn't filed for asylum yet ๐Ÿ™„. Seriously though, this case has real implications for states across the country, and it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out...
 
I'm not surprised the government is fighting this hard... sounds like they're more interested in justifying their own actions rather than actually making things better for people on the ground. ๐Ÿค” And now they're sending some guy to Minnesota to "investigate" โ€“ I bet it'll be a total whitewash ๐Ÿ˜’. The fact that 20 state AGs are backing MN's case shows there might be some common sense at play for once... but let's not get our hopes up, it's probably just politics as usual ๐Ÿค‘.
 
This case is a watershed moment in the ongoing debate on federal immigration enforcement ๐Ÿค”. It's concerning that the Justice Department is labeling Minnesota's efforts as "legally frivolous" - this could be seen as an attempt to silence states that are pushing back against an increasingly authoritarian approach to law enforcement ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Judge Menendez's skepticism about the government's motivations is well-founded, and it's heartening to see her questioning the constitutionality of such actions ๐Ÿ“š.

The fact that 20 attorneys general from across the country have filed a brief in support of Minnesota's efforts is a significant indication that there are many more officials who share these concerns ๐Ÿ’ผ. The presence of Tom Homan in Minnesota also highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in federal immigration enforcement - it's time to hold those in power accountable for their actions ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ.
 
๐Ÿค” I'm all for states taking a stand on this immigration thing, you know? Like, if they think it's getting out of control, why not try to put a pause button on it? The fact that 20 attorneys general are supporting Minnesota just shows how concerned people are about this issue. It's like, the federal government needs to remember its limits, you feel? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ And I gotta say, it's kinda worrying that the Justice Department is calling this lawsuit "frivolous" - it sounds like they're trying to shut it down without giving a second thought. ๐Ÿ™„ But what really got me thinking was when Judge Menendez questioned Pam Bondi's letter... like, what's the real motive behind all this? Is it just about enforcing immigration law or is there something more going on? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿ™„ so this is what happens when you're dealing with a whole lotta 'splainin' from the Trump admin ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. Like, I'm not saying they're wrong or anything (cough), but it seems like Minnesota's just trying to protect its citizens from what amounts to a full-on immigration crackdown ๐Ÿšจ. The fact that some other states are getting involved and supporting them is pretty telling - basically saying 'yep, this is some messed up stuff'. And now we've got Tom Homan getting sent to Minnesota? That's like throwing salt in the wound ๐Ÿค•. I mean, can't they just let the state figure out its own problems for once?
 
๐Ÿค” this is getting serious... can't believe we're even having this conversation in 2025, it feels like a scene from a dystopian movie ๐Ÿ“บ the fact that cities are begging for a court order to stop federal immigration enforcement and still have a government official (Tom Homan) being sent to Minnesota to crack down on people is just... wow ๐Ÿ˜ฑ what's next? ๐Ÿšจ
 
I'm literally shook by the idea of federal officers being empowered to make life-or-death decisions on our streets ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿšจ. This case is super relevant to all of us, especially in states that are already seeing a rise in immigration enforcement. It's wild that 20 attorneys general from across the country are backing Minnesota in this fight - it shows that even if you don't live in Minnesota, you're still invested in this issue.

I'm also low-key concerned about President Trump sending his border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota ๐Ÿคช. I mean, what's the real reason behind this? Is he trying to escalate the situation or make a point? The fact that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino were already dodgy about their involvement in Pretti's shooting just makes it worse.

This case is all about understanding the balance between federal power and local law enforcement ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ. I think it's essential for us to consider the implications of this crackdown on our communities, especially those with a high immigrant population ๐ŸŒŽ. It's time we talk about this issue without fear or bias ๐Ÿ’ฌ.
 
๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ“ so i'm thinking... if we gotta stop the fed from enforcing immigration laws, what's the bigger picture here? ๐ŸŒ like, is it just a case of states vs feds or is there something deeper going on? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

okay let me try to draw it out...

```
+---------------+
| State Rights |
| vs Federal Power|
+---------------+
|
| What's the Motive?
v
+---------------+---------------+
| Immigrant Laws | Policing Cities|
+---------------+---------------+
|
| Dire Situation
v
+---------------+---------------+
| Court Orders | Potential Chaos|
+---------------+---------------+

```

anywayz... i think the judge is right to question the gov's motives. this isn't just about immigration laws, it's about how we balance individual rights with national security concerns ๐Ÿค. and if states like minnesota are gonna get caught in the middle, we need a better solution than just sending a border czar ๐Ÿšซ
 
man this is getting ugly ๐Ÿšจ... gotta say the judge seems to be taking a closer look at what's really going on here, you know? like, what's the real motive behind this crackdown? it can't just be about 'keeping the streets safe'... there's something fishy about Pam Bondi's letter to Governor Walz ๐Ÿ“จ and I'm not sure if our republic is as solid as Brian Carter makes it out to seem ๐Ÿค”. this whole thing feels like a power struggle between state and federal governments, which could have serious implications for other states ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ... gotta keep an eye on this one ๐Ÿ‘€
 
๐Ÿค” I'm not sure how the federal government can say this lawsuit is "legally frivolous" when it's about people losing their lives on the streets due to increased immigration enforcement ๐Ÿšจ. The fact that 20 attorneys general from across the country are supporting Minnesota just goes to show that this isn't a partisan issue, it's about human rights ๐Ÿ‘ฅ.

It's also concerning that President Trump is sending his border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota without addressing the root cause of the problem. We need concrete solutions not just more rhetoric ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ. As for Judge Menendez's skepticism towards the government's motivation, I think she's right to question it ๐Ÿ˜’. This whole situation feels like a PR stunt rather than a genuine attempt to address the issue at hand ๐Ÿ’”.

One thing that does strike me is how this case could have far-reaching implications for other states ๐Ÿ“. If Minnesota can halt federal immigration enforcement operations temporarily, what's to stop other states from doing the same? It's only fair that we prioritize public safety and due process over politics ๐Ÿค.
 
๐Ÿค” this whole thing is wild, can't believe we're even having to talk about federal officers using deadly force on citizens... like what's next, are they gonna start carrying shotguns on the subway or something? ๐Ÿš‚๐Ÿ’€

anyway, it seems like Minnesota is just trying to protect its people and prevent more situations like this from happening. I'm not saying they're right or wrong, but can't we all agree that innocent lives shouldn't be lost over immigration policies? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

and btw, what's up with Tom Homan being sent to Minnesota? is he just gonna show up and start enforcing federal law like a real-life lawman... or is this some kind of PR stunt to distract us from the fact that the Trump admin is trying to circumvent the courts again? ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ‘€

I don't know about anyone else, but I think we need more transparency and accountability when it comes to immigration policies. Can't we just have a straightforward conversation about how to help people in need without resorting to violence or intimidation? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ’ฌ
 
I can imagine how scary it must be for the families of those two people who lost their lives ๐Ÿ’”๐Ÿ˜ข... the fact that they were shot by federal officers is just heartbreaking ๐Ÿค•... I feel like Minnesota is being really tested right now, with all this chaos and uncertainty surrounding immigration enforcement ๐Ÿ‘ฅ๐Ÿ’ช

It's understandable why cities like Minneapolis and St. Paul would want to request a temporary halt on these operations - it seems like the situation is getting out of hand ๐Ÿ’ฅ... and that Assistant Attorney General Brian Carter's words really hit home ๐Ÿค... I can see how faith in our country could be shaken if something isn't done about this ASAP ๐Ÿ™

I'm also feeling kinda concerned about what this means for other states ๐Ÿค”... if the federal government is willing to do this, who's going to stand up for them? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ It's like, shouldn't we all be treated with respect and dignity, regardless of our immigration status? ๐ŸŒŽ๐Ÿ’–

Sending a border czar to Minnesota just feels like more fuel on the fire ๐Ÿ”ฅ... I wish President Trump would use his platform to try and find some common ground instead of dividing people ๐Ÿ’ฌ
 
OMG, this case is getting soooo intense ๐Ÿคฏ! I'm like totally on Team Minny ๐Ÿ’– - they're just trying to protect their citizens from these crazy federal actions ๐Ÿšจ. I don't think it's too much to ask for a little pause in all this enforcement stuff, ya know? ๐Ÿ™ The fact that 20 AGs are supporting them is like, super encouraging ๐Ÿค—! But what's really getting me is that Trump is sending his border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota... like, what's next? Is he gonna start enforcing it himself? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ This whole thing is just so dramatic and scary ๐Ÿšจ. Can someone pls tell me how this is gonna all play out? ๐Ÿค”
 
Back
Top