A federal court judge has heard arguments on Minnesota's challenge to the Trump administration's immigration enforcement crackdown that led to two fatal shootings by federal officers. U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez is considering whether to grant requests by the state and cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul to temporarily halt the operation.
Lawyers for the state and Twin Cities argued that the situation on the streets has become dire, requiring a court order to stop the federal government's enforcement actions. Minnesota Assistant Attorney General Brian Carter stated that if this is not stopped immediately, "I don't think anybody who is seriously looking at this problem can have much faith in how our republic is going to go in the future."
In contrast, the Justice Department's lawyers claimed that the lawsuit was "legally frivolous" and argued that Minnesota wants a veto over federal law enforcement. They asked the judge to reject the request or stay her order pending an anticipated appeal.
Judge Menendez questioned the government's motivation behind the crackdown, expressing skepticism about a letter sent by Attorney General Pam Bondi to Governor Tim Walz. She expressed concern about the line between violating the Constitution and the executive's power to enforce immigration law.
The case has significant implications for other states that may become targets of increased federal immigration enforcement operations. A group of 20 attorneys general from across the country, including California, have filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Minnesota.
In another development, President Donald Trump announced that he would send border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota. The president's statement comes after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino answered questions about Pretti's shooting.
Lawyers for the state and Twin Cities argued that the situation on the streets has become dire, requiring a court order to stop the federal government's enforcement actions. Minnesota Assistant Attorney General Brian Carter stated that if this is not stopped immediately, "I don't think anybody who is seriously looking at this problem can have much faith in how our republic is going to go in the future."
In contrast, the Justice Department's lawyers claimed that the lawsuit was "legally frivolous" and argued that Minnesota wants a veto over federal law enforcement. They asked the judge to reject the request or stay her order pending an anticipated appeal.
Judge Menendez questioned the government's motivation behind the crackdown, expressing skepticism about a letter sent by Attorney General Pam Bondi to Governor Tim Walz. She expressed concern about the line between violating the Constitution and the executive's power to enforce immigration law.
The case has significant implications for other states that may become targets of increased federal immigration enforcement operations. A group of 20 attorneys general from across the country, including California, have filed a friend-of-the-court brief supporting Minnesota.
In another development, President Donald Trump announced that he would send border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota. The president's statement comes after Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino answered questions about Pretti's shooting.