The opioid settlement money is flowing into law enforcement coffers, sparking skepticism among those who say it's not addressing the root causes of the addiction crisis. In West Virginia, where Hardy County Commissioner Steven Schetrom's commission plans to spend a quarter of its settlement money on law enforcement, residents like Bre Dolan are questioning whether this approach will truly help families battling addiction.
Dolan, who has been through her own struggles with addiction and recovery, believes that more funds should be directed towards social workers, family support programs, and treatment centers. "How is that really tackling an issue?" she asks. "How will it help families battling addiction?"
The opioid settlement money is expected to flow into local governments over the next two decades, with more than $50 billion allocated nationwide. While some officials say law enforcement is crucial in rural areas, many experts argue that equipping police officers with overdose reversal medications and other prevention tools has been shown to save lives.
In contrast, initiatives like hiring social workers to accompany officers on overdose calls have been deemed effective by public health experts. However, the way the money is being spent varies widely from state to state. Some jurisdictions have allocated funds for basic first responder services, such as firefighter salaries, while others have used it to buy guns and vehicles.
The misuse of opioid settlement funds has sparked concern among advocates, who fear that this practice will become more common as states grapple with federal budget cuts. In New Jersey, lawmakers recently allocated $45 million in settlement funds to health systems, a move opposed by the state's attorney general and advocates.
Meanwhile, some states are taking proactive steps towards transparency. Colorado has released guidance against using opioid settlement funds for budget games, while other states like Maine, Maryland, and Kentucky are requiring local governments to report how they spend the money.
As Jennifer Twyman, an advocate from Louisville, Kentucky, puts it: "We have people literally dying on our sidewalks." She believes that any spending that doesn't directly help those struggling with addiction betrays the settlement's purpose. "It is the blood from many of my friends, people that I care deeply about," she says.
Dolan, who has been through her own struggles with addiction and recovery, believes that more funds should be directed towards social workers, family support programs, and treatment centers. "How is that really tackling an issue?" she asks. "How will it help families battling addiction?"
The opioid settlement money is expected to flow into local governments over the next two decades, with more than $50 billion allocated nationwide. While some officials say law enforcement is crucial in rural areas, many experts argue that equipping police officers with overdose reversal medications and other prevention tools has been shown to save lives.
In contrast, initiatives like hiring social workers to accompany officers on overdose calls have been deemed effective by public health experts. However, the way the money is being spent varies widely from state to state. Some jurisdictions have allocated funds for basic first responder services, such as firefighter salaries, while others have used it to buy guns and vehicles.
The misuse of opioid settlement funds has sparked concern among advocates, who fear that this practice will become more common as states grapple with federal budget cuts. In New Jersey, lawmakers recently allocated $45 million in settlement funds to health systems, a move opposed by the state's attorney general and advocates.
Meanwhile, some states are taking proactive steps towards transparency. Colorado has released guidance against using opioid settlement funds for budget games, while other states like Maine, Maryland, and Kentucky are requiring local governments to report how they spend the money.
As Jennifer Twyman, an advocate from Louisville, Kentucky, puts it: "We have people literally dying on our sidewalks." She believes that any spending that doesn't directly help those struggling with addiction betrays the settlement's purpose. "It is the blood from many of my friends, people that I care deeply about," she says.