A US-backed humanitarian foundation in Gaza has shut its operations, citing the staggering loss of life and desperation it faced while trying to deliver aid. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) had been criticized for its delivery model, which prioritized a small number of high-profile sites over the widespread delivery of food to those most in need.
Since Israel's government took control of GHF in May, nearly 3,000 Palestinians have died while trying to access aid. Many more have fallen victim to starvation and malnutrition due to the foundation's inability to deliver adequate supplies. In fact, a recent UN report declared a famine in Gaza City, resulting in at least 175 deaths.
Critics argue that GHF's approach is one of the worst examples of humanitarian aid ever attempted. The organization's reliance on private logistics and security firms has been likened to a "war by proxy," where aid workers are forced to navigate deadly queues and gunfire from Israeli forces.
"This model is an entity occupying negative space, and the negative space is the deadly siege that the government of Israel has imposed for most of this year," said Scott Paul, Oxfam America's director of peace and security. "GHF is a symptom, not the problem. The real issue here is the blockade and the lack of access to aid."
The Israeli government continues to restrict humanitarian aid, blocking over 100 requests from major NGOs, including Oxfam. Despite GHF's closure, aid groups remain concerned that its tactics could be replicated in other conflict zones around the world.
As Anastasia Moran, advocacy director at MedGlobal, warned: "My biggest fear is if anyone looks at GHF and thinks this is a model that should be tried elsewhere. It would be disastrous."
The humanitarian crisis in Gaza shows no signs of abating, with thousands more expected to die due to lack of access to aid. As the international community struggles to respond to this devastating situation, it's clear that the true failure lies not with the foundation itself, but with the policies and actions of those who claim to care for its people.
Since Israel's government took control of GHF in May, nearly 3,000 Palestinians have died while trying to access aid. Many more have fallen victim to starvation and malnutrition due to the foundation's inability to deliver adequate supplies. In fact, a recent UN report declared a famine in Gaza City, resulting in at least 175 deaths.
Critics argue that GHF's approach is one of the worst examples of humanitarian aid ever attempted. The organization's reliance on private logistics and security firms has been likened to a "war by proxy," where aid workers are forced to navigate deadly queues and gunfire from Israeli forces.
"This model is an entity occupying negative space, and the negative space is the deadly siege that the government of Israel has imposed for most of this year," said Scott Paul, Oxfam America's director of peace and security. "GHF is a symptom, not the problem. The real issue here is the blockade and the lack of access to aid."
The Israeli government continues to restrict humanitarian aid, blocking over 100 requests from major NGOs, including Oxfam. Despite GHF's closure, aid groups remain concerned that its tactics could be replicated in other conflict zones around the world.
As Anastasia Moran, advocacy director at MedGlobal, warned: "My biggest fear is if anyone looks at GHF and thinks this is a model that should be tried elsewhere. It would be disastrous."
The humanitarian crisis in Gaza shows no signs of abating, with thousands more expected to die due to lack of access to aid. As the international community struggles to respond to this devastating situation, it's clear that the true failure lies not with the foundation itself, but with the policies and actions of those who claim to care for its people.