Labour's Hillsborough Law Bill Stuck in Limbo as Families Demand Compromise
The UK government has put its new law aimed at preventing official cover-ups on hold until it can reach a compromise with families of those affected by the Hillsborough disaster and other tragedies. The bill, designed to bring accountability to public authorities, would allow for prosecution of officials who lie or evade.
However, negotiations have hit a roadblock over how the duty of candour in the public authority (accountability) bill should apply to serving intelligence officers. The government has agreed that the law should cover the security services, but wants to give agency chiefs the final say over when individual officers can give evidence - a power the families argue is unacceptable and could lead to future cover-ups.
Families and their representatives met with ministers on Monday but left without agreement. Labour leader Keir Starmer said he was determined to find a solution, emphasizing the need for balance between national security and accountability.
"We care hugely that we get this right, that we right the wrongs for very many families who have been let down," Starmer said. "We're taking time to make sure we get that balance absolutely right."
The government has laid down its own amendments to the bill, which added further obligations on the security services but still did not meet with the demands of the affected families.
A Labour source said there was no option but to delay the bill until a compromise could be reached. The Liverpool West Derby MP Ian Byrne had signed an amendment that was in line with the families' demands, and other local leaders such as the Liverpool city region mayor Steve Rotheram and the Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham expressed concerns about the government's amendments.
The campaign group Hillsborough Law Now welcomed the government's withdrawal of its security services amendment, saying it was a step forward. However, the delay is likely to keep the bill out of the Commons for several weeks, with MPs relieved that the issue has been pushed back but also frustrated by the lack of progress.
A government source said there was no deadline for resolving the talks, and agreement would be needed with multiple stakeholders before the bill could move forward.
The UK government has put its new law aimed at preventing official cover-ups on hold until it can reach a compromise with families of those affected by the Hillsborough disaster and other tragedies. The bill, designed to bring accountability to public authorities, would allow for prosecution of officials who lie or evade.
However, negotiations have hit a roadblock over how the duty of candour in the public authority (accountability) bill should apply to serving intelligence officers. The government has agreed that the law should cover the security services, but wants to give agency chiefs the final say over when individual officers can give evidence - a power the families argue is unacceptable and could lead to future cover-ups.
Families and their representatives met with ministers on Monday but left without agreement. Labour leader Keir Starmer said he was determined to find a solution, emphasizing the need for balance between national security and accountability.
"We care hugely that we get this right, that we right the wrongs for very many families who have been let down," Starmer said. "We're taking time to make sure we get that balance absolutely right."
The government has laid down its own amendments to the bill, which added further obligations on the security services but still did not meet with the demands of the affected families.
A Labour source said there was no option but to delay the bill until a compromise could be reached. The Liverpool West Derby MP Ian Byrne had signed an amendment that was in line with the families' demands, and other local leaders such as the Liverpool city region mayor Steve Rotheram and the Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham expressed concerns about the government's amendments.
The campaign group Hillsborough Law Now welcomed the government's withdrawal of its security services amendment, saying it was a step forward. However, the delay is likely to keep the bill out of the Commons for several weeks, with MPs relieved that the issue has been pushed back but also frustrated by the lack of progress.
A government source said there was no deadline for resolving the talks, and agreement would be needed with multiple stakeholders before the bill could move forward.