US Universities Under Surveillance: How Fusion Centers Target Pro-Palestine Activists
Fusion centers, a network of law enforcement agencies designed to facilitate intelligence sharing between federal, state, and local authorities, have become a tool for universities to surveil and silence pro-Palestine student activists. These centers, established in the aftermath of 9/11, were initially intended to prevent future terror attacks by pooling information from various sources.
However, documents obtained through public records requests reveal that fusion centers are also being used to monitor peaceful demonstrations on university campuses. At least five universities across the US have been identified as having fusion center connections, with OSU in Ohio and Cal Poly Humboldt in California being among them.
A tip-off from an Ohio fusion center led to a warning about a pro-Palestine demonstration at Ohio State University, prompting the police department to assemble an operations plan and shut down the event. Thirty-six protesters were arrested that night, sparking concerns about the use of counterterrorism intelligence-sharing hubs to surveil and suppress student activism.
Experts warn that the proliferation of fusion centers has contributed to a "scope creep" in mass surveillance, allowing for broader and more intricate monitoring of American citizens under the guise of national security. The Electronic Frontier Foundation's Rory Mir notes that "between AI assessments of online speech, the swirl of reckless data sharing from fusion centers, and often opaque campus policies, it's a recipe for disaster."
University administrators have been accused of using federal surveillance as a pretext to crack down on pro-Palestine student activism. At Cal Poly Humboldt, the university president tapped into the local Fusion Center to assist with investigative measures against students who occupied a building. The FBI also provided warrants for the search and seizure of devices.
The normalization of intelligence sharing between campus police departments and federal agencies has created a culture of fear among pro-Palestine activists. As Tariq Kenney-Shawa, Al-Shabaka's US policy fellow, notes, "We are up against repressive forces that have always been there, but have never been this advanced."
Critics argue that universities have a duty to protect their students' rights and freedoms, including those guaranteed under the First Amendment. The use of fusion centers to surveil student activism is seen as a threat to civil liberties and an example of how law enforcement agencies can be co-opted by universities to silence dissent.
As the Trump administration's authoritarian tactics become more brazen, concerns about the erosion of democratic norms and the rise of surveillance states are growing. The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments and billionaire oligarchs, but warns that the current situation in the US is particularly concerning.
"It's even worse than we thought," reads a headline on The Intercept's website. "Court orders are being ignored... News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation." As readers, they urge support for independent journalism and democracy.
Fusion centers, a network of law enforcement agencies designed to facilitate intelligence sharing between federal, state, and local authorities, have become a tool for universities to surveil and silence pro-Palestine student activists. These centers, established in the aftermath of 9/11, were initially intended to prevent future terror attacks by pooling information from various sources.
However, documents obtained through public records requests reveal that fusion centers are also being used to monitor peaceful demonstrations on university campuses. At least five universities across the US have been identified as having fusion center connections, with OSU in Ohio and Cal Poly Humboldt in California being among them.
A tip-off from an Ohio fusion center led to a warning about a pro-Palestine demonstration at Ohio State University, prompting the police department to assemble an operations plan and shut down the event. Thirty-six protesters were arrested that night, sparking concerns about the use of counterterrorism intelligence-sharing hubs to surveil and suppress student activism.
Experts warn that the proliferation of fusion centers has contributed to a "scope creep" in mass surveillance, allowing for broader and more intricate monitoring of American citizens under the guise of national security. The Electronic Frontier Foundation's Rory Mir notes that "between AI assessments of online speech, the swirl of reckless data sharing from fusion centers, and often opaque campus policies, it's a recipe for disaster."
University administrators have been accused of using federal surveillance as a pretext to crack down on pro-Palestine student activism. At Cal Poly Humboldt, the university president tapped into the local Fusion Center to assist with investigative measures against students who occupied a building. The FBI also provided warrants for the search and seizure of devices.
The normalization of intelligence sharing between campus police departments and federal agencies has created a culture of fear among pro-Palestine activists. As Tariq Kenney-Shawa, Al-Shabaka's US policy fellow, notes, "We are up against repressive forces that have always been there, but have never been this advanced."
Critics argue that universities have a duty to protect their students' rights and freedoms, including those guaranteed under the First Amendment. The use of fusion centers to surveil student activism is seen as a threat to civil liberties and an example of how law enforcement agencies can be co-opted by universities to silence dissent.
As the Trump administration's authoritarian tactics become more brazen, concerns about the erosion of democratic norms and the rise of surveillance states are growing. The Intercept has long covered authoritarian governments and billionaire oligarchs, but warns that the current situation in the US is particularly concerning.
"It's even worse than we thought," reads a headline on The Intercept's website. "Court orders are being ignored... News outlets that challenge Trump have been banished or put under investigation." As readers, they urge support for independent journalism and democracy.