Australia's complicity in human rights abuses through its role in supplying critical components for the F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia has sparked growing concerns. The US President Donald Trump's decision to sell up to 48 jets to the Saudi regime, despite widespread criticism over its human rights record, has left Australia vulnerable to accusations of backing a government responsible for atrocities.
The Australian contribution to the F-35 production is significant, with more than 70 local companies involved in contracts and over 700 critical pieces manufactured in Victoria alone. This means that any bombs dropped by these planes are only possible because of the Australian-made parts. Critics argue that this makes Australia complicit in human rights abuses, as it provides the technology to a government responsible for bombing raids on civilian targets.
Experts warn that the global F-35 supply chain, which includes Australia, is riddled with weaknesses that allow governments to deny direct support for foreign militaries. However, these denials are often hollow, given the complexity of the supply chain and the lack of effective monitoring by the US government.
The Australian Department of Defence has denied asking questions about refusing to supply parts for jets bound for Saudi Arabia, fueling concerns about its willingness to turn a blind eye to human rights abuses. Meanwhile, the US itself does not comprehensively monitor where its weapons end up or how they are used, with only 1.6% of export authorisations subject to targeted checks.
The sale has sparked widespread condemnation globally, particularly in light of Saudi Arabia's involvement in the Yemeni civil war, which has killed an estimated 377,000 people. The conflict has seen nearly 15,000 civilians killed by direct military action, mostly in airstrikes by the Saudi-led coalition.
Critics also warn that Australia is losing control over its foreign policy, as it becomes increasingly entangled in the complex web of arms deals and supply chains that underpin US defence exports. With no effective checks in place to prevent Australian-made parts from being used in human rights abuses, concerns about complicity are growing.
The Australian contribution to the F-35 production is significant, with more than 70 local companies involved in contracts and over 700 critical pieces manufactured in Victoria alone. This means that any bombs dropped by these planes are only possible because of the Australian-made parts. Critics argue that this makes Australia complicit in human rights abuses, as it provides the technology to a government responsible for bombing raids on civilian targets.
Experts warn that the global F-35 supply chain, which includes Australia, is riddled with weaknesses that allow governments to deny direct support for foreign militaries. However, these denials are often hollow, given the complexity of the supply chain and the lack of effective monitoring by the US government.
The Australian Department of Defence has denied asking questions about refusing to supply parts for jets bound for Saudi Arabia, fueling concerns about its willingness to turn a blind eye to human rights abuses. Meanwhile, the US itself does not comprehensively monitor where its weapons end up or how they are used, with only 1.6% of export authorisations subject to targeted checks.
The sale has sparked widespread condemnation globally, particularly in light of Saudi Arabia's involvement in the Yemeni civil war, which has killed an estimated 377,000 people. The conflict has seen nearly 15,000 civilians killed by direct military action, mostly in airstrikes by the Saudi-led coalition.
Critics also warn that Australia is losing control over its foreign policy, as it becomes increasingly entangled in the complex web of arms deals and supply chains that underpin US defence exports. With no effective checks in place to prevent Australian-made parts from being used in human rights abuses, concerns about complicity are growing.