A Minnesota man convicted of assaulting an ICE agent may soon uncover new evidence in the killing of Renee Good, a 37-year-old poet and mother of three. The connection lies with Jonathan Ross, the same officer who shot and killed Good during a targeted operation in Minneapolis last month.
Attorneys for Roberto Carlos Muñoz-Guatemala, who was convicted of assaulting Ross on December 10, are now seeking access to investigative files related to Good's killing. Muñoz-Guatemala had been dragged by Ross with his car in June 2025 after attempting to escape from agents trying to deport him.
The defense argues that if a jury had considered the question of whether driving away was a reasonable response during Muñoz-Guatemala's trial, they may have access to evidence that could shed light on Ross' behavior and tactics. This information could potentially reveal whether Ross has a history of behaving recklessly or contrary to his training.
Court filings indicate that Ross and other agents were attempting to interview Muñoz-Guatemala last summer when the incident occurred. The agent used a tool to shatter the rear driver's-side window before reaching inside, during which time Muñoz-Guatemala was dragged approximately 100 yards while repeatedly deploying a taser.
Muñoz-Guatemala's attorneys claim that if his client had been tried after Good's killing, his defense may have also argued that he was justified in resisting Ross, who they believe was the aggressor and used excessive force. The jury instructions essentially contained a two-part decision tree: Jurors could convict Muñoz-Guatemala if they believed he should have known Ross was law enforcement, or if driving away was not a reasonable response.
Prosecutors have yet to file a response to the motions, but the defense hopes that gaining access to these files may help shed light on Ross' conduct during the incident and whether it was in line with his training.
Attorneys for Roberto Carlos Muñoz-Guatemala, who was convicted of assaulting Ross on December 10, are now seeking access to investigative files related to Good's killing. Muñoz-Guatemala had been dragged by Ross with his car in June 2025 after attempting to escape from agents trying to deport him.
The defense argues that if a jury had considered the question of whether driving away was a reasonable response during Muñoz-Guatemala's trial, they may have access to evidence that could shed light on Ross' behavior and tactics. This information could potentially reveal whether Ross has a history of behaving recklessly or contrary to his training.
Court filings indicate that Ross and other agents were attempting to interview Muñoz-Guatemala last summer when the incident occurred. The agent used a tool to shatter the rear driver's-side window before reaching inside, during which time Muñoz-Guatemala was dragged approximately 100 yards while repeatedly deploying a taser.
Muñoz-Guatemala's attorneys claim that if his client had been tried after Good's killing, his defense may have also argued that he was justified in resisting Ross, who they believe was the aggressor and used excessive force. The jury instructions essentially contained a two-part decision tree: Jurors could convict Muñoz-Guatemala if they believed he should have known Ross was law enforcement, or if driving away was not a reasonable response.
Prosecutors have yet to file a response to the motions, but the defense hopes that gaining access to these files may help shed light on Ross' conduct during the incident and whether it was in line with his training.