India is once again considering a radical proposal that would significantly erode the already thin line of privacy in the digital realm: requiring smartphone manufacturers to pre-install an always-on satellite-based location tracking feature. The move has been met with fierce opposition from tech giants like Apple, Google, and Samsung, who have warned that this could have severe consequences for individuals' right to privacy.
Under the proposed plan, location services would be enabled all the time, with no option to switch them off or opt out of sharing users' precise locations with law enforcement agencies. This would allow police and investigators to pinpoint individuals' exact locations at any time, raising concerns about potential misuse by rogue authorities or malicious actors.
Proponents claim that this is necessary to aid in law enforcement efforts and help keep citizens safe from harm, citing the need for more accurate location data during investigations. However, critics argue that this measure would be a gross overreach of government authority and could compromise the privacy of millions of people, including journalists, corporate executives, military personnel, and even judges.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has expressed its outrage at the proposal, stating that it would "horrify" anyone familiar with the potential consequences. Cooper Quintin, an EFF Senior Staff Technologist, warned that this change would grant law enforcement agencies unprecedented access to individuals' precise locations without any legal due process.
As one might expect from such a drastic measure, the Indian government has long been concerned about the limitations of existing location data, which can be inaccurate by several meters. However, critics argue that the solution lies not in mandating invasive tracking measures but rather in improving law enforcement's access to more accurate and reliable data.
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration is expected to meet with telecom industry executives soon to discuss the proposal, despite opposition from tech giants and civil society groups who are adamant that this measure would be a step too far.
Under the proposed plan, location services would be enabled all the time, with no option to switch them off or opt out of sharing users' precise locations with law enforcement agencies. This would allow police and investigators to pinpoint individuals' exact locations at any time, raising concerns about potential misuse by rogue authorities or malicious actors.
Proponents claim that this is necessary to aid in law enforcement efforts and help keep citizens safe from harm, citing the need for more accurate location data during investigations. However, critics argue that this measure would be a gross overreach of government authority and could compromise the privacy of millions of people, including journalists, corporate executives, military personnel, and even judges.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has expressed its outrage at the proposal, stating that it would "horrify" anyone familiar with the potential consequences. Cooper Quintin, an EFF Senior Staff Technologist, warned that this change would grant law enforcement agencies unprecedented access to individuals' precise locations without any legal due process.
As one might expect from such a drastic measure, the Indian government has long been concerned about the limitations of existing location data, which can be inaccurate by several meters. However, critics argue that the solution lies not in mandating invasive tracking measures but rather in improving law enforcement's access to more accurate and reliable data.
India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration is expected to meet with telecom industry executives soon to discuss the proposal, despite opposition from tech giants and civil society groups who are adamant that this measure would be a step too far.
like what's next? we'll be forced to use facial recognition apps everywhere we go and the government will have access to all our personal info... its so creepy 
I mean I get it they want to help with law enforcement but come on thats not how it works. We need more transparency and accountability not less 
the EFF is right on this one, this proposal would be a disaster for privacy advocates like me 
This is getting out of hand... just because we're always connected doesn't mean we should have our every move tracked 
I'm all for keeping people safe, but do we really need to sacrifice our basic human rights in the process? 
It's like they're trying to create a surveillance state without even being subtle about it. Can't we just focus on improving security through better data analysis and AI instead of resorting to invasive tracking measures? 
. Like, we're already living in an age where our online activity is tracked and monitored by governments and corporations left and right... now they want to take it to the next level? 
. It was a nightmare trying to get that sorted out. And now we're talking about forcing everyone to pre-install some kind of tracking feature on their phones without even asking for consent? 
That just feels so invasive and Orwellian.
It's just not right, you know?
. I mean, think about all the times you're just chillin' at home and your location is being tracked 24/7? It's already bad enough when you have to opt out of sharing your location with Google Maps or whatever. But this takes it to a whole new level... like, what if you're just trying to enjoy some Netflix in peace and the cops show up because they know exactly where you are? 
.
I mean, think about it, if they implement this, we're talking like 2-3 billion people having their location tracked all the time 
. According to my research, the average person shares their location 10-15 times per day on social media alone 
. Can you imagine if that were linked to real-time tracking? 
Did you know that Google's own Location History dataset has over 1 trillion location points recorded between 2008 and 2012 
In terms of economic impact, did you know that the Indian tech industry is projected to reach $350 billion by 2025 
? Implementing invasive tracking measures could potentially stifle innovation and drive companies out of the country. It's a risk we shouldn't take lightly 
.
. Can't they just focus on improving law enforcement's access to accurate data instead of forcing everyone to live in the cloud? I mean, I get it, location services can be super useful for investigations and all that, but does it really have to come at the cost of our individual freedoms? 
. Like, what's next? Mandatory facial recognition in every public place? This is just a slippery slope, folks. The EFF has got a point - this would be a huge overreach and could lead to some serious privacy issues.
.
But seriously, this would be a huge overreach of power and it could lead to some serious issues with law enforcement and surveillance. I mean, what happens when rogue authorities start misusing this info? 
How about they focus on improving data accuracy instead of tracking us all the time? 