In a bizarre and disturbing incident, a federal judge in Chicago censored the face of an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent during a public court proceeding. The reason for this unusual request was that ICE Deputy Field Office Director Shawn Byers had taken precautions to disconnect his identity from his online presence.
The government claimed that there were threats against Byers, with bounties of up to $50,000 reportedly issued on his head by cartels. However, it emerged that these claims were largely unfounded and based on the government's own misrepresentations. When a judge asked for details about these "threats," Byers initially claimed there was a bounty on his life, but later clarified that all senior ICE officials in Chicago were at risk.
In an astonishing twist, the judge discovered that a simple Google search could have revealed Byers' identity and location. The judge expressed frustration with the government's attempts to obscure Byers' face, stating that it "looks a little silly" when one can find his picture online by simply searching for his name.
This incident highlights the lengths to which the government will go to shield its officials from accountability, using baseless claims about threats and intimidation as a pretext. It also underscores the dangers of allowing judges to become pawns in the administration's anti-transparency objectives.
In the wake of this incident, journalists must be vigilant in their skepticism of government narratives, particularly when it comes to claims of "threats" against public officials. The Intercept will continue to push back against these misrepresentations and demand that our elected leaders operate under the light of transparency and accountability.
The government claimed that there were threats against Byers, with bounties of up to $50,000 reportedly issued on his head by cartels. However, it emerged that these claims were largely unfounded and based on the government's own misrepresentations. When a judge asked for details about these "threats," Byers initially claimed there was a bounty on his life, but later clarified that all senior ICE officials in Chicago were at risk.
In an astonishing twist, the judge discovered that a simple Google search could have revealed Byers' identity and location. The judge expressed frustration with the government's attempts to obscure Byers' face, stating that it "looks a little silly" when one can find his picture online by simply searching for his name.
This incident highlights the lengths to which the government will go to shield its officials from accountability, using baseless claims about threats and intimidation as a pretext. It also underscores the dangers of allowing judges to become pawns in the administration's anti-transparency objectives.
In the wake of this incident, journalists must be vigilant in their skepticism of government narratives, particularly when it comes to claims of "threats" against public officials. The Intercept will continue to push back against these misrepresentations and demand that our elected leaders operate under the light of transparency and accountability.
a judge is literally saying its silly for gov to try 2 hide agent's face when ur just gonna find it online lol what's next theyre gonna say we cant tweet about us cuz its a national security thing? 
but seriously its wild how gov will go to lengths 2 keep ppl in the dark and use threats as an excuse. journalists need 2 be extra careful w/ their fact-checking 
I'm thoroughly perplexed by this development, the federal judge's ruling seems almost... amateurish considering the ease with which Byers' identity could have been uncovered through a simple Google search 
. It raises serious questions about the government's motives, using unsubstantiated claims of threats as a means to obscure its officials from scrutiny 
. This smacks of a classic case of administrative overreach, and I worry that we're witnessing a slippery slope where judges are increasingly being used as tools for the administration to suppress transparency 
. The Intercept's commitment to fact-checking and calling out government narratives is more crucial than ever 
.
.
.
.
. Can we trust what our leaders tell us? I say 55% of the time 
. Like, what's next? Is the gov gonna hide their own faces too because some cartels are mad at them? I mean, come on, a simple Google search can find anyone's info online. It's not like it's a secret identity or something. And now our judges have to sit through these ridiculous "threat" claims? No thanks 
. This is just more proof that the gov doesn't wanna be held accountable for their actions. They're always trying to spin stuff and hide behind some BS about national security or whatever. Newsflash: we've got eyes on you, gov 
.
The judge just had to Google his name to figure out who he was, and the government is all like "oh no, our secret's out" 
. It's not about protecting Byers' identity, it's about covering up their own incompetence and lack of transparency. This whole thing is just a big mess, and The Intercept needs to keep calling BS on the gov't's claims 
.
so the gov is trying to protect one of their own from being held accountable by censoring his face in court, but it turns out all they had to do was google him lol like what a waste of resources! 
as a netizen, it's so frustrating when gov officials think they can just manipulate the truth like this, but we gotta keep pushing for transparency and accountability 