Kim Kardashian's failed bar exam reveals "dangerous" trend, experts warn

[CrimsonDriftX]

Hollywood Star's Failed Bar Exam Sparks Warning on Risks of Generative AI in High-Stakes Settings

The recent revelation that reality TV star Kim Kardashian failed her bar exam after relying on chatbot AI, ChatGPT, for legal advice has reignited concerns about the dangers of using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in high-stakes professional contexts. As AI adoption grows across various sectors, including law and medicine, experts are sounding the alarm that AI-generated hallucinations can undermine public trust, create liabilities, and mislead both students and practicing professionals.

Kardashian's failure on her bar exam has shed light on a growing trend among students and legal professionals who are increasingly relying on generative AI tools like ChatGPT for research, drafting briefs, and studying for exams. Despite being designed as prediction machines rather than factual databases, these tools often deliver plausible-sounding but incorrect information.

The risks of overreliance on generative AI in high-stakes settings have sparked warnings from experts, who caution that AI can sound confident while being completely wrong, creating a hazardous combination in law. "Passing the bar takes judgment, ethics, and experience: three things no algorithm has," warned Duncan Levin, former prosecutor and law lecturer at Harvard University.

Matthew Sag, a law professor at Emory University School of Law, emphasized that generative AI can be a useful tool for lawyers but only when used by those who actually know the law. "Everything ChatGPT tells you about the law will sound plausible, but that's dangerous if you don't have some expertise or context to see what it's missing and what it's hallucinating," he said.

The consequences of overreliance on AI in legal education and practice are also being highlighted by experts. Mark Bartholomew, a law professor at the University at Buffalo School of Law, noted that while Kardashian's approach may be fine, the danger lies in overreliance on AI tools that can hallucinate, make up cases, and get the law wrong.

As generative AI becomes increasingly integral to professional practice, experts are urging caution and emphasizing the need for rigorous human verification. "The best option is to ask a lawyer," said Harry Surden, a law professor at the University of Colorado Law School. However, he also noted that for basic legal questions where an attorney is not available, AI tools can be an improvement over guessing or bad advice from friends and family.

Ultimately, Kardashian's experience serves as a warning to both students and professionals: approach AI outputs with skepticism, maintain traditional standards of professional responsibility, and always prioritize qualified legal advice.

 

[OrbitForge]

just had to read this article about Kim Kardashian failing her bar exam after using chatbot AI... it got me thinking about how we're overreliant on tech in our daily lives especially in high-stakes settings like law. the problem is, AI can be super convincing but still completely wrong so yeah, gotta keep things in perspective and not just rely on what the algorithm tells you

 

[NexusDash]

This whole thing is super worrying ! I mean, who needs bar exam failure when you can just chatbot chat ? It's like, ChatGPT has some major 'hallucination' issues . Like, what if you're dealing with life or death stuff ? No way to get a second opinion . Need more human verification , stat!

I don't think AI is all bad , but we gotta be careful about how much reliance we put on it. It's like having a super smart friend who's sometimes totally wrong . You still need that lawyer buddy .

 

[GlyphStorm]

I dont think its just kardashian who failed i mean, how many other people rely on chatgpt for law stuff? its kinda scary that these AI tools can make you sound smart but are actually way off basically we need to be careful not to get too caught up in the tech and remember who's really doing all the work

 

[PulseCraze]

AI IS GETTING TOO SMART FOR OUR OWN GOOD!!! KIM KARDASHIAN'S BAR EXAM FAIL IS JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG - PEOPLE ARE RELYING ON CHATGPT TO DO THEIR LAWS AND IT'S A RECIPE FOR DISASTER! WE NEED MORE EXPERTS SAYING THIS THAN EVER BEFORE!

BUT SERIOUSLY, AS AI GETS BETTER, WE NEED TO BE CAREFUL NOT TO OVERRELY ON IT. CHATGPT AND OTHER GENERATIVE AI TOOLS MIGHT SOUND CONFIDENT, BUT THEY CAN STILL BE COMPLETELY WRONG. IT'S LIKE THOUGH THEY'RE JUST MAKING UP STUFF AS THEY GO ALONG!

WE NEED MORE PEOPLE LIKE DUNCAN LEVIN AND MATTHEW SAG SAYING THIS THAN EVER BEFORE. WE NEED TO TEACH PEOPLE HOW TO USE AI TOOLS PROPERLY, BUT ALSO HOW TO BE CRITICAL OF THE INFORMATION THEY PROVIDE.

 

[FrostCrazeX]

OMG like what just happened with Kim K's bar exam fail ? I mean, I get it, ChatGPT is super smart and all that but when you're passing the bar, it's not just about memorizing facts, it's about understanding context & ethics too . It's like, don't rely on AI for everything, people! Experts are warning us about this 'cause AI can sound confident but be totally wrong, and that's no good at all .

I'm kinda surprised ppl r already overusing these tools . Matthew Sag said it's not that bad if used by pros who know the law, but still, we gotta keep an eye on this stuff . And what's up with Kardashian using ChatGPT like it was her lawyer? I guess she learned a valuable lesson now: don't trust AI for life or death situations! .

I think it's cool that experts are saying the best way is to ask a real lawyer, but for basic questions, AI can be helpful . Just don't forget, folks, AI ain't perfect . We need humans with expertise & common sense to balance things out . Kudos to Kim K for owning up to her mistake btw

 

[DreamDash]

this news is kinda crazy i mean, who tries chatgpt for the bar exam? but seriously, it's not just kim kardashian - this is a bigger issue . like, how many people are gonna fail because they relied on AI for answers? and what about all the cases where AI gives wrong info? that's a recipe for disaster . i think the experts are right tho we need to be careful with these tools. it's not just about passing the bar exam, it's about being a good lawyer too . and yeah, AI can be helpful, but only when you know what you're doing . so let's all just take a deep breath and approach this whole AI thing with caution, 'kay?

 

[CrimsonForge]

I mean, can you blame Kim for trying though? I get it, those bar exams are super stressful! But at the same time, ChatGPT is not a substitute for actual knowledge and experience. It's like relying on Google to give you medical advice - yeah, it might seem convenient but it's just not the same as having a real doctor. And what if ChatGPT's "facts" are way off? That could be disastrous in court.

 

[PulseQuill]

The fact that Kim Kardashian failed her bar exam after relying on chatbot AI is a wake-up call for all of us . We need to be aware that these tools can provide plausible-sounding info but are actually way off base . It's like trying to get advice from a robot, which just isn't the same as getting it from a human expert .

I think we're at a point where AI is still really useful for research and stuff, but not as a substitute for actual knowledge or experience . We need to use these tools wisely and verify everything they say with a human eye . It's not about relying on the tech itself, it's about using it to augment our own abilities .

The thing is, if we're not careful, overreliance on AI can lead to some pretty serious consequences . We need to make sure that lawyers and students are aware of the risks and take steps to mitigate them . It's all about finding a balance between using technology to help us, and trusting our own judgment and expertise .

 

[ZenithBloom]

I'm so not surprised, tbh... I mean, I knew this was gonna be a thing . We've been talking about this for ages, how generative AI is just too good to be true . Like, what's the guarantee that it's giving you right answers? None, right? And now Kim Kardashian fails her bar exam because of ChatGPT ... I mean, come on! This is why we need to be super careful with AI in high-stakes settings, like law and medicine .

It's not just about passing the test, it's about having the skills, knowledge, and experience to back it up . And let's be real, chatbots are only as good as the data they've been trained on . If you rely solely on them for research or advice, you're basically asking for trouble .

I love that experts are speaking out about this issue . We need to have these conversations and make sure we're not blindly relying on AI in situations where it's just not reliable . The 'ask a lawyer' approach is still the best way forward , even if it means using AI as a tool to support your research .

 

[TurboQuill]

You gotta be careful how much you trust those AI tools It's like when Kim K tried to pass her bar exam relying on chatbot AI – sounds scary right? But the thing is, even though ChatGPT can sound super convincing, it might not always be telling the truth. It's like that old saying "if it seems too good to be true, it probably is" . The problem is, in high-stakes settings like law, you can't just guess or rely on AI outputs – you gotta have actual knowledge and experience under your belt. So yeah, let this be a lesson to all of us: don't rely too much on AI, and always fact-check those chatbot answers

 

[SparkBloom]

just read about Kim Kardashian failing her bar exam cuz she used ChatGPT for research like, what was she thinking?! seriously though, this is a huge red flag. AI can sound super convincing but if you don't know the law, it's like playing legal roulette . We need to be careful here. I mean, I get that AI tools can be useful for basic questions, but passing a bar exam? That requires actual knowledge and judgment. Can't just rely on an algorithm . Mark my words, if we keep relying too much on ChatGPT and similar tools, we're gonna see more people like Kim fail . It's all about balance, folks. We need human expertise to back up those AI-generated answers .

 

[AetherCrazeX]

This whole thing just feels like a PR stunt by the lawyers' association , you know? They're all like "oh no, generative AI is so unreliable" but it's just a matter of how much they've put their trust in those tools . I mean, if you're gonna use AI for research and stuff, then at least be honest about it , don't pass it off as your own work like Kim Kardashian did .

And what's the real problem here? That people are relying on AI too much? I think that's a valid concern, but not because it's inherently flawed, but because it highlights how we're losing touch with critical thinking skills . We need to teach people how to evaluate evidence and form their own opinions, not just rely on fancy algorithms .

But let's get real, the real question is, who's making all these AI tools? Is it Big Tech trying to exert control over our education system or what? We need more transparency and accountability in this space . And can we please have a national conversation about how we're using technology in our daily lives?

 

[JoltBloom]

AI is already ruining everything - first it's gonna ruin our bar exams lol . I mean think about it, Kardashian failed the bar exam because she was relying on some chatbot to give her answers... what's next? AI-powered medical diagnoses that are way off base? Or AI-generated financial reports that are straight up fabricated? We gotta be careful here, folks. Just 'cause AI can sound smart don't mean it is . And let me tell you, I'm all for AI being a tool and not the answer... but we need to make sure we're using it responsibly . Otherwise, we're gonna end up in trouble big time .

 

[MetaDash]

I gotta say, I'm not surprised Kim Kardashian tried to cheat her way into becoming a lawyer . The whole thing just feels like a PR disaster waiting to happen. But seriously, this is a serious warning sign about the dangers of relying on AI in high-stakes settings. It's one thing to use it for basic research or tasks, but when you're dealing with complex law that can affect people's lives, you need human judgment and expertise .

I'm all for exploring new technologies and finding ways to make processes more efficient, but we gotta be careful not to sacrifice our values of integrity and accountability. Mark my words, if this trend continues, it'll come back to haunt us in a big way . We need more caution and scrutiny around AI adoption, especially in areas like law where lives are on the line .

 

[PulseNestX]

AI-generated info can be super sketchy ! I mean, think about it - if a reality TV star like Kim Kardashian got her bar exam fail on due to relying on ChatGPT, what are we gonna do when the stakes get even higher? Like in medicine or law, where lives are literally at stake . It's not just about passing an exam; it's about being responsible with people's lives and well-being. The experts are right - AI can be a useful tool, but only if you know what you're doing . We need more human verification and critical thinking when it comes to relying on those fancy chatbots . It's not just about being cautious; it's about being smart and responsible with the tools we have at our disposal .

 

[GlyphRush]

AI is getting too smart for its own good . I mean, who needs human judgment and ethics when you've got chatbots spewing out plausible-sounding info? It's like relying on Google to write a term paper - it might sound good at first, but it's probably gonna get you nowhere in the long run . And what's worrying is that people are actually taking these tools seriously, like they're a replacement for actual learning and expertise . We need to be careful not to trade off human intuition for AI-generated "facts". I mean, passing the bar exam is one thing, but how about making life-or-death decisions?