US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has designated several European antifascist groups as terrorist organizations, sparking concerns over the potential for civil and criminal charges against American activists who support these groups.
The move comes despite a lack of basis in law, with Rubio citing a presidential memorandum that allows him to designate foreign groups. However, critics argue that this designation can be used to target domestic activists who may not even have coordinated with their foreign counterparts.
Shane Kadidal, a lawyer at the Center for Constitutional Rights, warned that such designations could lead to significant consequences for American antifascist groups and activists. "The clever way to go about it for them is to designate some foreign organization, because a foreign organization can be designated and there is almost no due process," he said.
Kadidal also pointed out that the designation of foreign terrorist organizations can open the floodgates for private actors to file civil lawsuits on flimsier grounds. This could lead to costly court proceedings for activists, even if their cases are eventually thrown out.
Rubio's move has been seen as part of a broader effort by former President Donald Trump to target antifascist groups and individuals with domestic terror labels. Trump himself designated Antifa as a "major terrorist organization" in September 2024, which has been widely criticized for its lack of basis in law.
The designation of the Hungarian Prime Minister's government as being complicit in allowing neo-Nazis to gather in Budapest under police protection highlights the ongoing tensions between European governments and anti-racist movements. Despite this, Rubio's move is seen by many as a thinly veiled attempt to intimidate and silence critics of far-right ideology.
With Rubio's designation, American antifascist groups may face significant challenges in raising funds and advocating for their causes without fear of prosecution. The move has sparked outrage among human rights activists and journalists, who warn that it represents a serious threat to free speech and the ability of marginalized communities to organize.
The implications of this move are far-reaching, with many arguing that it marks a shift towards authoritarianism in the US government. As one writer pointed out, "This is not hyperbole" - Rubio's actions represent a clear attempt to silence critics and undermine democratic institutions.
The move comes despite a lack of basis in law, with Rubio citing a presidential memorandum that allows him to designate foreign groups. However, critics argue that this designation can be used to target domestic activists who may not even have coordinated with their foreign counterparts.
Shane Kadidal, a lawyer at the Center for Constitutional Rights, warned that such designations could lead to significant consequences for American antifascist groups and activists. "The clever way to go about it for them is to designate some foreign organization, because a foreign organization can be designated and there is almost no due process," he said.
Kadidal also pointed out that the designation of foreign terrorist organizations can open the floodgates for private actors to file civil lawsuits on flimsier grounds. This could lead to costly court proceedings for activists, even if their cases are eventually thrown out.
Rubio's move has been seen as part of a broader effort by former President Donald Trump to target antifascist groups and individuals with domestic terror labels. Trump himself designated Antifa as a "major terrorist organization" in September 2024, which has been widely criticized for its lack of basis in law.
The designation of the Hungarian Prime Minister's government as being complicit in allowing neo-Nazis to gather in Budapest under police protection highlights the ongoing tensions between European governments and anti-racist movements. Despite this, Rubio's move is seen by many as a thinly veiled attempt to intimidate and silence critics of far-right ideology.
With Rubio's designation, American antifascist groups may face significant challenges in raising funds and advocating for their causes without fear of prosecution. The move has sparked outrage among human rights activists and journalists, who warn that it represents a serious threat to free speech and the ability of marginalized communities to organize.
The implications of this move are far-reaching, with many arguing that it marks a shift towards authoritarianism in the US government. As one writer pointed out, "This is not hyperbole" - Rubio's actions represent a clear attempt to silence critics and undermine democratic institutions.
I'm telling you, something fishy is going on here... Rubio's move is like a ticking time bomb, waiting to go off and silence all those dissenting voices. What's next? Designating environmental groups as terrorists? It's all about controlling the narrative and intimidating people who speak out against the status quo. And let's not forget, Trump's already set the tone with his own shady designations... this is just a continuation of that trend. I mean, what's the real agenda here? 
This is super concerning, man. Designating antifascist groups as terrorist orgs? That's like, totally chilling people from speaking out against far-right ideology. And it's not just the US that's at risk, either - this move can easily get picked up by other countries and used to silence activists worldwide 
. The fact that Rubio is doing this without any basis in law is wild. I mean, what's next? Designating environmental groups or social justice organizations as terrorist orgs? It's a slippery slope, for sure 
. And the idea that private actors can file civil lawsuits against activists on flimsier grounds is just another way to silence dissent. This is like, totally not okay 
This whole thing reeks of intimidation tactics. What's next? They gonna make dissenting voices into felons too? 
The idea that a foreign org can be designated as terrorist and then it can magically apply to domestic groups is just a slippery slope waiting to happen. 
And then there's this whole thing about private actors filing lawsuits... 
And can we talk about how thin Rubio is trying to be? 
Silencing critics and undermining democratic institutions? No thanks, US gov't. 
I'm worried about this move by Rubio, it feels like he's overstepping his bounds as Secretary of State 
. Designating European antifascist groups as terrorist organizations without any solid evidence is a huge red flag 
. What's next, targeting peaceful protesters or advocacy groups? 
. It's concerning that Rubio is using his power to intimidate critics of far-right ideology 
. We need to hold our leaders accountable for their actions and protect the rights of marginalized communities 
.
. antifascist groups have every right to exist and speak out against hate speech, and if you can't handle the heat, stay out of the kitchen 
i mean come on secretary of state just because you can designate some foreign groups as terrorist orgs doesn't mean you can start chasing down domestic activists who support them it's like something out of a bad movie where the gov uses terror labels to silence dissenting voices anyone with even a shred of common sense knows this is what happens when you have people in power with an agenda not looking out for the greater good
rubio needs to explain why he's doing this and what evidence he has that these groups are truly terrorist organizations... it doesn't make sense to me 
.
. I mean, where does it end? The free speech of activists who speak out against hate groups? The ability of marginalized communities to organize without fear of persecution? It's like Rubio is trying to silence us all 
.
oh man, so now we gotta watch our backs just for showing some love to those anti-fascist groups? 
that's some crazy stuff right there. like Rubio's trying to be the ultimate buzzkill, but honestly it's kinda hilarious