White House Push to Undermine Midterms Gains Momentum with National Voter Database
The Department of Justice is moving forward with its ambitious plan to create a first-ever national voter database, assembling complete voter registration lists from states that have surrendered their sensitive information. The list includes private details like driver's license numbers, Social Security numbers, and addresses linked to individual names, along with birth dates.
In effect, the federal government has merged its immigration database into a "voter verification" tool aimed at removing eligible voters from rolls based on supposed discrepancies. Critics argue this plan bypasses federal privacy protections but may not be viewed as alarming by some Americans who already provide this information voluntarily to the government through various channels like TSA facial profiling and tax reporting.
However, experts caution that this data grab poses a significant threat because it undermines state authority in election administration – an authority established by America's Founders to prevent centralizing too much power in federal hands. The timing of this initiative is particularly concerning given President Trump's past claims about "dysfunctional elections" and his penchant for mobilizing federal immigration agents into cities perceived as blue.
The national voter database also poses significant risks, including false matches that could flag eligible voters as non-citizens, inadequate cybersecurity safeguards to protect against hacking, and no guarantee that the data will not be used to subvert election outcomes. Experts warn that once such a comprehensive database is created, it could be exploited by the administration to question the validity of election results or even send ICE agents into polling places in an effort to intimidate voters.
Furthermore, the federal government may use this database as leverage to seize control over state voting operations or suspend elections altogether – something unprecedented in U.S. history. Even Trump's repeated claims of voter fraud and alleged "rigged" elections have inspired many states to resist sharing their voter data with the Department of Justice, only for the agency to sue them.
Currently, eight states have fully surrendered their voter registration lists, while a dozen others have only provided publicly available information. However, 23 states, including Republican-controlled Georgia, have pushed back against the DOJ's demands and are resisting the plan. Voting advocacy groups, such as the ACLU and Common Cause, have also joined these efforts.
In contrast to this unfolding crisis, many county and state election supervisors emphasize their commitment to maintaining the integrity of the electoral system, often citing the safeguards in place to prevent voter suppression. When confronted with Trump's unfounded claims about elections being "rigged," they express frustration at his continued propaganda and urge him to desist.
For now, it appears that a majority of states are pushing back against this national voter database initiative, which would have significant implications for American democracy if successful.
The Department of Justice is moving forward with its ambitious plan to create a first-ever national voter database, assembling complete voter registration lists from states that have surrendered their sensitive information. The list includes private details like driver's license numbers, Social Security numbers, and addresses linked to individual names, along with birth dates.
In effect, the federal government has merged its immigration database into a "voter verification" tool aimed at removing eligible voters from rolls based on supposed discrepancies. Critics argue this plan bypasses federal privacy protections but may not be viewed as alarming by some Americans who already provide this information voluntarily to the government through various channels like TSA facial profiling and tax reporting.
However, experts caution that this data grab poses a significant threat because it undermines state authority in election administration – an authority established by America's Founders to prevent centralizing too much power in federal hands. The timing of this initiative is particularly concerning given President Trump's past claims about "dysfunctional elections" and his penchant for mobilizing federal immigration agents into cities perceived as blue.
The national voter database also poses significant risks, including false matches that could flag eligible voters as non-citizens, inadequate cybersecurity safeguards to protect against hacking, and no guarantee that the data will not be used to subvert election outcomes. Experts warn that once such a comprehensive database is created, it could be exploited by the administration to question the validity of election results or even send ICE agents into polling places in an effort to intimidate voters.
Furthermore, the federal government may use this database as leverage to seize control over state voting operations or suspend elections altogether – something unprecedented in U.S. history. Even Trump's repeated claims of voter fraud and alleged "rigged" elections have inspired many states to resist sharing their voter data with the Department of Justice, only for the agency to sue them.
Currently, eight states have fully surrendered their voter registration lists, while a dozen others have only provided publicly available information. However, 23 states, including Republican-controlled Georgia, have pushed back against the DOJ's demands and are resisting the plan. Voting advocacy groups, such as the ACLU and Common Cause, have also joined these efforts.
In contrast to this unfolding crisis, many county and state election supervisors emphasize their commitment to maintaining the integrity of the electoral system, often citing the safeguards in place to prevent voter suppression. When confronted with Trump's unfounded claims about elections being "rigged," they express frustration at his continued propaganda and urge him to desist.
For now, it appears that a majority of states are pushing back against this national voter database initiative, which would have significant implications for American democracy if successful.