Trial to Decide if Social Media Giants' Technology Can be Held Addictive
A Los Angeles County Superior Court jury is set to hear a trial that could determine whether social media giants, including Meta, TikTok, and YouTube, deliberately designed their platforms to be addictive to children in order to boost profits. The case centers around a 19-year-old plaintiff who claims that using social media from a young age led to depression, suicidal thoughts, and addiction.
The lawsuit, filed by the unnamed plaintiff, or "KGM," alleges that these companies employed behavioral techniques similar to those used by slot machines and the tobacco industry to maximize youth engagement and generate advertising revenue. If successful, this argument could bypass Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects tech companies from liability for user-generated content.
Mark Zuckerberg is expected to testify during the six-to-eight-week trial, alongside executives from Meta, TikTok, and YouTube. The tech giants dispute these claims, citing numerous safeguards they've added over the years, arguing that they are not liable for third-party content posted on their platforms.
However, recent trends in lawsuits have shifted focus toward holding social media companies accountable for harming children's mental well-being. In a similar vein, school districts and state attorneys general across several states have filed lawsuits against Meta, claiming it is contributing to the youth mental health crisis by deliberately designing features that addict children to its platforms on Instagram and Facebook.
The case has significant implications, with experts drawing parallels to the Big Tobacco trials of the 1990s. This trial could be a bellwether for over a thousand similar cases being brought against social media giants in recent years.
A Los Angeles County Superior Court jury is set to hear a trial that could determine whether social media giants, including Meta, TikTok, and YouTube, deliberately designed their platforms to be addictive to children in order to boost profits. The case centers around a 19-year-old plaintiff who claims that using social media from a young age led to depression, suicidal thoughts, and addiction.
The lawsuit, filed by the unnamed plaintiff, or "KGM," alleges that these companies employed behavioral techniques similar to those used by slot machines and the tobacco industry to maximize youth engagement and generate advertising revenue. If successful, this argument could bypass Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects tech companies from liability for user-generated content.
Mark Zuckerberg is expected to testify during the six-to-eight-week trial, alongside executives from Meta, TikTok, and YouTube. The tech giants dispute these claims, citing numerous safeguards they've added over the years, arguing that they are not liable for third-party content posted on their platforms.
However, recent trends in lawsuits have shifted focus toward holding social media companies accountable for harming children's mental well-being. In a similar vein, school districts and state attorneys general across several states have filed lawsuits against Meta, claiming it is contributing to the youth mental health crisis by deliberately designing features that addict children to its platforms on Instagram and Facebook.
The case has significant implications, with experts drawing parallels to the Big Tobacco trials of the 1990s. This trial could be a bellwether for over a thousand similar cases being brought against social media giants in recent years.