More Than 880 Google Employees Call on Company to End Contracts with ICE and CBP.
In a bold move, nearly 900 Google employees have signed a petition urging the company to disclose and cancel any contracts it may have with US immigration authorities, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The workers say they are "vehemently opposed" to Google's dealings with these agencies, which they claim uses technology to power state violence around the world.
The petition was organized by No Tech for Apartheid, a group of Google employees who oppose what they describe as tech militarism - the integration of corporate tech platforms, cloud services, and AI into military and surveillance systems. The group says that the company's silence on these matters is unacceptable.
One Google software engineer said, "We object to the technology we build being used to power state violence around the world." Another employee, who went by Alex, added, "I stand to benefit from other people's suffering, which I find abhorrent and I refuse to be a quiet participant in that system."
Google has declined to comment on the petition's demands. However, a company spokesperson said that the technologies at issue are basic computing and data storage services available to any customer.
The US immigration authorities have been under intense public scrutiny this year as the Trump administration ramped up its mass deportation campaign, sparking nationwide protests. The confrontations between protesters and federal agents culminated in the fatal shooting of two US citizens by immigration officers. In response to the backlash, the Trump administration and Congress are negotiating changes to ICE's tactics.
Some of the Department of Homeland Security's most lucrative contracts are for software and tech gear from a variety of vendors, including Google, Amazon, and Palantir. Workers at these suppliers have raised concerns in the past about whether the technology they develop is being used for surveillance or to carry out violence.
In 2019, nearly 1,500 workers at Google signed a petition demanding that the tech giant suspend its work with Customs and Border Protection until the agency stopped engaging in what they said were human rights abuses. More recently, staff at Google's AI unit asked executives to explain how they would prevent ICE from raiding their offices.
Employees at Palantir have also raised questions internally about the company's work with ICE, according to WIRED reports. Over 1,000 people across the tech industry signed a letter last month urging businesses to dump the agency.
The petition signed by Google employees aims to renew pressure on the company to acknowledge recent events and any work it may be doing with immigration authorities. It demands that Google's leadership publicly call for urgent changes to US government immigration enforcement tactics and hold an internal discussion with workers about the principles they consider when deciding to sell technology to state authorities.
The growing criticism of tech companies' involvement in US immigration policy highlights the challenges faced by these businesses as they navigate complex issues of national security, human rights, and corporate responsibility.
In a bold move, nearly 900 Google employees have signed a petition urging the company to disclose and cancel any contracts it may have with US immigration authorities, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The workers say they are "vehemently opposed" to Google's dealings with these agencies, which they claim uses technology to power state violence around the world.
The petition was organized by No Tech for Apartheid, a group of Google employees who oppose what they describe as tech militarism - the integration of corporate tech platforms, cloud services, and AI into military and surveillance systems. The group says that the company's silence on these matters is unacceptable.
One Google software engineer said, "We object to the technology we build being used to power state violence around the world." Another employee, who went by Alex, added, "I stand to benefit from other people's suffering, which I find abhorrent and I refuse to be a quiet participant in that system."
Google has declined to comment on the petition's demands. However, a company spokesperson said that the technologies at issue are basic computing and data storage services available to any customer.
The US immigration authorities have been under intense public scrutiny this year as the Trump administration ramped up its mass deportation campaign, sparking nationwide protests. The confrontations between protesters and federal agents culminated in the fatal shooting of two US citizens by immigration officers. In response to the backlash, the Trump administration and Congress are negotiating changes to ICE's tactics.
Some of the Department of Homeland Security's most lucrative contracts are for software and tech gear from a variety of vendors, including Google, Amazon, and Palantir. Workers at these suppliers have raised concerns in the past about whether the technology they develop is being used for surveillance or to carry out violence.
In 2019, nearly 1,500 workers at Google signed a petition demanding that the tech giant suspend its work with Customs and Border Protection until the agency stopped engaging in what they said were human rights abuses. More recently, staff at Google's AI unit asked executives to explain how they would prevent ICE from raiding their offices.
Employees at Palantir have also raised questions internally about the company's work with ICE, according to WIRED reports. Over 1,000 people across the tech industry signed a letter last month urging businesses to dump the agency.
The petition signed by Google employees aims to renew pressure on the company to acknowledge recent events and any work it may be doing with immigration authorities. It demands that Google's leadership publicly call for urgent changes to US government immigration enforcement tactics and hold an internal discussion with workers about the principles they consider when deciding to sell technology to state authorities.
The growing criticism of tech companies' involvement in US immigration policy highlights the challenges faced by these businesses as they navigate complex issues of national security, human rights, and corporate responsibility.