US National Park Service removes exhibits honoring enslaved people at historic President's House
In a move that has left many questioning its historical significance, the US National Park Service removed exhibits commemorating nine people who were enslaved at George Washington's home in Philadelphia on Thursday afternoon. The display, which included monitors and text displays telling the stories of the enslaved individuals and offering background on the slave trade, was dismantled by park employees as part of a review ordered by the Trump administration.
The review, led by US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, aimed to identify any federal displays deemed "ideological" that may be subject to removal. While the slavery exhibit in Philadelphia was not directly mentioned in the review process, news reports had hinted at its potential removal months earlier.
In a statement, Michael Coard, a lawyer who spearheaded the installation of the memorial in 2010 and now leads the Avenging the Ancestors Coalition, condemned the action as "historically outrageous and blatantly racist." He noted that the exhibits were an important part of American history, providing context for children to learn about slavery and its impact on Philadelphia.
The removal of the exhibits has sparked outrage among local officials and community members. Mayor Cherelle Parker's administration has filed a lawsuit against the city's 2006 agreement with the federal government, which could require advance notice for changes to the site. City Council members had previously condemned President Trump's approach to whitewashing American history, stating that celebrating the 250th anniversary of America should include acknowledging its dark past.
Coard recalled his own experiences learning about Washington's ownership of slaves in Philadelphia and expressed hope that the exhibits would be restored. He saw them as a vital resource for educating children and ensuring that gaps in American historical knowledge are addressed.
As the memorial faces an uncertain future, Coard vowed to fight the decision, stating that preserving such displays is essential for providing an accurate and comprehensive understanding of America's complex history.
In a move that has left many questioning its historical significance, the US National Park Service removed exhibits commemorating nine people who were enslaved at George Washington's home in Philadelphia on Thursday afternoon. The display, which included monitors and text displays telling the stories of the enslaved individuals and offering background on the slave trade, was dismantled by park employees as part of a review ordered by the Trump administration.
The review, led by US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, aimed to identify any federal displays deemed "ideological" that may be subject to removal. While the slavery exhibit in Philadelphia was not directly mentioned in the review process, news reports had hinted at its potential removal months earlier.
In a statement, Michael Coard, a lawyer who spearheaded the installation of the memorial in 2010 and now leads the Avenging the Ancestors Coalition, condemned the action as "historically outrageous and blatantly racist." He noted that the exhibits were an important part of American history, providing context for children to learn about slavery and its impact on Philadelphia.
The removal of the exhibits has sparked outrage among local officials and community members. Mayor Cherelle Parker's administration has filed a lawsuit against the city's 2006 agreement with the federal government, which could require advance notice for changes to the site. City Council members had previously condemned President Trump's approach to whitewashing American history, stating that celebrating the 250th anniversary of America should include acknowledging its dark past.
Coard recalled his own experiences learning about Washington's ownership of slaves in Philadelphia and expressed hope that the exhibits would be restored. He saw them as a vital resource for educating children and ensuring that gaps in American historical knowledge are addressed.
As the memorial faces an uncertain future, Coard vowed to fight the decision, stating that preserving such displays is essential for providing an accurate and comprehensive understanding of America's complex history.