Scientists have long been fascinated by the possibility of bringing back extinct species, including Neanderthals. The idea has gained momentum in recent years, thanks to advances in genetic editing technologies such as CRISPR. However, experts are now cautioning that resurrecting Neanderthals is not only technologically challenging but also raises serious ethical concerns.
According to some scientists, it's possible to create a being with a wholly Neanderthal genome within 20 years or so, thanks to the rapid progress of CRISPR technology. However, others argue that this would be a grave mistake, both ethically and legally. The idea of bringing back an extinct human species raises questions about informed consent, as well as concerns about the potential consequences for the individual, such as their ability to communicate, socialize, and adapt to modern society.
Moreover, even if scientists could successfully create a Neanderthal-like being, it's unclear what information they would gain from this endeavor. The world has changed significantly since the last Neanderthals went extinct 30,000 years ago, making it unlikely that their descendants would be able to survive or thrive in modern environments.
Furthermore, some experts argue that finding and analyzing well-preserved human remains, such as Ötzi the Iceman or Tollund Man, could provide a wealth of information about our closest relatives. These individuals offer a unique window into the lives and cultures of ancient humans, providing insights into their clothing, diet, health, and even spiritual practices.
Ultimately, while the idea of bringing back extinct species may seem exciting, it's crucial to consider the potential risks and consequences before proceeding. As one bioethicist noted, "the de-extinction of human predecessors could be undertaken at any time by private entities." It's essential that scientists, policymakers, and the public engage in a nuanced discussion about the ethics of de-extinction, particularly when it comes to bringing back extinct human species like Neanderthals.
According to some scientists, it's possible to create a being with a wholly Neanderthal genome within 20 years or so, thanks to the rapid progress of CRISPR technology. However, others argue that this would be a grave mistake, both ethically and legally. The idea of bringing back an extinct human species raises questions about informed consent, as well as concerns about the potential consequences for the individual, such as their ability to communicate, socialize, and adapt to modern society.
Moreover, even if scientists could successfully create a Neanderthal-like being, it's unclear what information they would gain from this endeavor. The world has changed significantly since the last Neanderthals went extinct 30,000 years ago, making it unlikely that their descendants would be able to survive or thrive in modern environments.
Furthermore, some experts argue that finding and analyzing well-preserved human remains, such as Ötzi the Iceman or Tollund Man, could provide a wealth of information about our closest relatives. These individuals offer a unique window into the lives and cultures of ancient humans, providing insights into their clothing, diet, health, and even spiritual practices.
Ultimately, while the idea of bringing back extinct species may seem exciting, it's crucial to consider the potential risks and consequences before proceeding. As one bioethicist noted, "the de-extinction of human predecessors could be undertaken at any time by private entities." It's essential that scientists, policymakers, and the public engage in a nuanced discussion about the ethics of de-extinction, particularly when it comes to bringing back extinct human species like Neanderthals.
...i mean i guess its cool that we're making progress with genetic editing but lets not get ahead of ourselves here 20 yrs or so is a pretty tight timeline for somethin thats as complex as human biology imo...just think about all the issues w/ informed consent and adapting to modern society...its not just about bringing back an extinct species its about what we're gonna do with it 
️... And what about their mental health? It's like, we have our own issues with school stress and anxiety, can you even imagine dealing with that on top of, like, being a caveman? 
Plus, think about all the jobs and resources it would require to keep them alive in modern society 
... I don't get why scientists are so obsessed with this idea. We should be learning more about our own history and culture instead of trying to play god 
.
It's not just about getting a genome from 30k years ago, it's about creating a whole new life form that can adapt to our society. What if they struggle to communicate or socialize? We gotta consider the potential consequences for both the Neanderthals and modern humans.
Anyway, bringing back Neanderthals might be cool and all, but do we really want to mess with someone who's gonna think "what's up with all these weirdos staring at tiny screens?"? And let's not forget about the whole "surviving in modern society" thing – I mean, have you seen how hard it is for your average human to handle Tinder? 
and have you guys thought about the mental health implications for these ancient humans when dropped into modern society? they'd prob struggle w/ anxiety & depression just like ppl do today 
CRISPR is cool, but let's not play God. If we can't even save endangered animals, why bring back humans? 
And have you seen those documentaries on Ötzi the Iceman and Tollund Man? They're like, way more informative than any hypothetical revived Neanderthal ever could be! Plus, thinkin' about all the potential problems with bringin' back an extinct species is just mind-blowing. 
and yeah, finding those well-preserved bodies is already giving us a lot of info, so why do we need to bring them back? 
another one 
just learned that scientists might actually try to bring back the Neanderthals... think about what kinda weirdo we're gonna be dealing with 
and then there's the whole informed consent thing... like, did our Neanderthal ancestors ever agree to be studied and potentially cloned? 
think about all the ethics involved, it's crazy 