On way out of office, Phil Murphy signs one bill on immigrant protections but vetoes two related measures

New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy has made his final move before leaving office, signing a bill aimed at protecting immigrants but vetoing two related measures in a move that has left advocates feeling disappointed and vulnerable.

The Safe Communities Act, which is now law, instructs the state attorney general to develop plans to safeguard "personal freedoms" in institutions such as hospitals, schools, courthouses, and places of worship. It also calls for separate policies in each setting, with agencies required to adopt these measures within 180 days.

Murphy's decision comes amidst rising Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids across the US. In a statement, he emphasized that no one should be deterred from accessing essential services due to their immigration status, saying "whether you're praying in a church, studying in school, receiving medical care at a hospital, or seeking legal relief, no one should live in fear or uncertainty."

However, Murphy vetoed two other bills as part of the package. The Privacy Protections Act would have limited government agencies and healthcare providers' ability to ask about immigration status when determining eligibility for public benefits. Murphy cited concerns over potential drafting oversight that could jeopardize billions of federal funding dollars.

The third bill aimed to codify an existing 2018 attorney general directive, which prohibits law enforcement from questioning someone based on their suspected citizenship status. Murphy expressed concern that signing this bill would open up a new court challenge and put the state's time-tested Immigrant Trust Directive at risk.

Immigration activists have criticized Murphy's decision, with the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey calling it "deeply disappointing." The group believes the vetoes left communities vulnerable and urges Governor-elect Mikie Sherrill to establish data privacy protections and ensure that state and local resources are not commandeered for federal immigration enforcement.
 
Aww ๐Ÿค— I just can't believe Phil Murphy is leaving office and making these decisions as his final act... ๐Ÿ™ He's still trying to make a positive impact, even if it means making some tough choices ๐Ÿ˜”. I get why he vetoed those bills - safety and security have to come first, right? ๐Ÿ’ฏ But at the same time, I can see how the vetoes are gonna affect people who need help ๐Ÿค•. Fingers crossed that Governor-elect Sherrill can build on his legacy and make some real changes soon ๐Ÿ’ช!
 
omg u wont believe wat just happened in new jersey ๐Ÿคฏ phil murphy, the governor, signed a bill thats supposed to protect immigrants but hes also blocked 2 other bills dat wouldve helped them out even more ๐Ÿ˜” he said its cuz of concerns over gov funds but i think its just an excuse ๐Ÿค‘ anyways, immigration activists r not happy about it & its making people feel scared and unsure about accessing essential services like hospitals, schools, and churches ๐Ÿšจ the american civil liberties union of new jersey is calling out murphy for being disppointing & they want gov-elect mikie sherrill to step in & protect communities ๐Ÿ‘Š
 
I donโ€™t usually comment but I gotta say, this whole thing is kinda weird ๐Ÿค”... So Governor Murphy is trying to be all pro-immigrant and sign a bill that's supposed to protect their rights, but then he vetoes two other bills that are pretty crucial too ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ. I mean, I get it about the funding concerns and all that, but it feels like he's just making things harder for people who need help most ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

And now immigration activists are saying they're left feeling vulnerable and stuff ๐Ÿ˜•... I don't know, maybe I'm just missing something here. It seems like Governor Murphy is trying to do the right thing but then screws it up somehow ๐Ÿ˜ณ. Anyway, gotta keep an eye on this one ๐Ÿ‘€
 
ugh i'm so down for some protection of immigrants rights ๐Ÿค, but governor murphy's decision to veto those two bills is like, totally underwhelming ๐Ÿ™„. the safe communities act sounds great on paper, but without those privacy protections and immigrant trust directives in place, it's like a half-measure ๐Ÿคฅ. i mean, what's the point of having laws if they're just gonna be watered down by politics ๐ŸŒŠ? the ACLU is right, this decision left ppl feeling vulnerable and scared ๐Ÿ™ˆ, and now micie sherrill needs to step up and make some real changes ๐Ÿ’ช #ImmigrationReformNow #JusticeForAll
 
So Governor Murphy just signed the Safe Communities Act, which is actually kinda cool I guess, it's like a bill that says healthcare workers and teachers can't ask about your immigration status unless they really need to... but then he vetoed two other bills that would have helped with data protection ๐Ÿค”. I mean, I get why he was worried about the vetoes affecting federal funding, but come on, Governor-elect Sherrill is gonna have to step in and fix this mess soon!
 
I'm literally shook by Murphy's move ๐Ÿคฏ! Protecting immigrants is one thing, but vetoing measures that could have made a real difference? It feels like a step backward ๐Ÿ˜”. I get it about the funding concerns, but can't we find ways to compromise on data privacy and still support our community members who need help? ๐Ÿค The Immigration Trust Directive was already in place, so why did he veto the bill that codified it? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ It's like, what's next? ๐Ÿšจ
 
just saw this news ๐Ÿค”, gotta say i'm kinda surprised phil murphy went with the Safe Communities Act but vetoed those other 2 bills ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ privacy protecions act and the one that would've codified that 2018 attorney gen's directive... seems like a step back for immigrants in new jersey ๐Ÿ‘Ž, especially with all these ice raids happening across the us ๐Ÿšจ i hope governor sherrill makes sure to address those concerns ASAP ๐Ÿ’ก
 
I'm a bit surprised by Murphy's move on this bill ๐Ÿค”. On one hand, it's great to see him taking steps to protect immigrants' rights, especially in vulnerable places like hospitals and schools ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿ“š. But the vetoes on the Privacy Protections Act and the Immigrant Trust Directive bill really have me scratching my head ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I get where he's coming from about potential drafting issues and court challenges, but can't we find a way to safeguard immigrants' rights without putting these bills at risk? ๐Ÿ’” It feels like the state is trying to balance competing priorities, but in the end, it might leave communities feeling even more uncertain and unprotected ๐Ÿค•.
 
man i'm really disappointed in phil murphy's move on this new bill...i get his concerns about drafting oversight but two bills down? like, we need protection from government snooping around our private info & healthcare records ASAP. the us is in the midst of these ICE raids & ppl are scared for their lives already. murphy should've stood strong on those 2 vets instead of playing it safe ๐Ÿค•
 
im so down for governor murphy to take action on protecting immigrants in nj, but vetoing 2 out of 3 bills is a major bummer ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ“‰ the safe communities act is still a step in the right direction tho ๐Ÿš€

stats show us that immigrants in usa are making huge contributions to economy - in 2020 alone they paid over $142 billion in state and local taxes ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ“Š meanwhile, immigration-related detentions have increased by 37% since 2018 ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ˜ฌ data says that people with limited english proficiency face barriers when accessing healthcare & education services ๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš•๏ธ๐Ÿ“š

according to american civil liberties union of nj, the state's failure to pass privacy protections act puts communities at risk ๐Ÿค• data on us immigration detentions by the aclu shows 92% of those detained were not in deportation proceedings when apprehended ๐Ÿš”๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
๐Ÿ˜” I can feel how disappointed you must be ๐Ÿค• with Gov. Murphy's decision. It's like, he just signed a bill to protect immigrants, but at the same time, he vetoed two other important ones that would have given them even more freedom and safety ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ. I know how scary it is to live in fear of being questioned about your immigration status, especially when you're trying to access basic services like healthcare or education ๐Ÿค. It's like, what are they going to do next? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ
 
man... I'm feeling really uneasy about this whole situation ๐Ÿค•. it's like, governor murphy is trying to make a move in the right direction with the safe communities act, but then he vetoes those two other bills that could've really made a huge difference ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ. it's like, what's the point of even having protections for immigrants if we're not gonna follow through on them? and now the ACLU is saying that governor-elect sherrill needs to step up and make some real changes ๐Ÿ’ช. it's like, we can't just be all talk and no action, you know? we need to really think about how our decisions are affecting people's lives ๐Ÿค.
 
omg what a bummer ๐Ÿค•, i mean i get why murphy vetoed those bills but it's like he's trying to balance security with compassion at the same time, which is super hard to do ๐Ÿคฏ. as an immigrant myself, i know how scary it can be to access basic services without knowing if your docs are gonna care about your visa status ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. so yeah, on one hand, i get why murphy wanted to protect those billions of dollars in funding ๐Ÿ’ธ, but on the other hand, i wish he could've found a way to make both sides work ๐Ÿค”. now it's up to sherrill to take things in the right direction ๐Ÿ‘€.
 
๐Ÿค• I gotta say, this is really frustrating. Murphy's trying to do something good for immigrants, but he's holding back on other stuff that could make a real difference. Like, what's the point of having plans in place if they can be easily overturned? And those vetoes are just gonna leave people feeling scared and unsure about getting the help they need.

I mean, I get it, there are concerns about oversight and funding, but you'd think Governor Murphy would find a way to address those issues without jeopardizing everything else. The ACLU is right, though - these vetoes left communities feeling vulnerable and unprotected. We need strong protections for our state's residents, regardless of their immigration status.
 
Back
Top