Opinion: Does the Democratic Party want Michigan’s Black progressives to win? - Detroit Metro Times

Democrat Party's Alleged Disregard for Black Progressives in Michigan

A special primary election in Michigan's 35th district is set to take place on Tuesday, with the outcome potentially shaping Governor Gretchen Whitmer's final months in office. However, what's particularly noteworthy here is not the candidates themselves but rather the party machinery behind them.

According to new reports, committees linked to influential Michigan Senate Democrats have invested nearly $70,000 in supporting a moderate Democrat over a more progressive Black candidate, Dr. Pamela Pugh. Despite her impressive community endorsements and fundraising prowess, powerful Democrats have instead opted to back the less popular yet more palatable option. This move has raised eyebrows among observers.

This isn't an isolated incident; since the beginning of 2026, two promising Democratic candidates for statewide office have dropped out of the race, including Lt. Governor Garlin Gilchrist II and Deputy Secretary of State Aghogho Edevbie. Both had strong qualifications and were poised to win. Their decision to exit the campaign raises questions about what might be driving this behavior.

As a critical factor is that both candidates are Black, which has long been an underrepresented demographic in Michigan politics. It's worth noting that Black voters make up only 14% of the electorate yet have historically struggled for representation at the state level, with only four Black individuals having ever held statewide office.

While it might seem like a typical aspect of campaign dynamics – candidates sometimes dropping out due to polling numbers or internal party pressure – this particular situation appears to be more calculated. Michigan Democratic Party leadership has shown a consistent pattern of undermining Black leadership in favor of expediency, often at the expense of representation and diversity.

The author, James Johnson, a political director at Detroit Action, notes that this type of behavior won't go unnoticed by voters, who will notice when corporate interests like DTE bankroll an "independent" campaign in 2026. The consequence of such tactics could lead to a splintered vote in the general election, undermining hard-won Democratic gains and erasing progress made by Black candidates.

Ultimately, this incident highlights the need for Democrat Party leadership to prioritize diversity and representation over internal party politics. If Democrats want to win in Michigan – and beyond – they must do better by supporting Black candidates and voters as a day-to-day priority, not just on Election Day.
 
I'm thinking that this is super shady what's going on with the Dem Party in MI. They're basically passing up some amazing opportunities for Black folks to get more involved in politics. It's like they think we're not gonna be noticed or anything. 🤔 I mean, come on, you put 70k into backing a candidate who's not gonna win? That just doesn't add up. And what's with the pattern of undermining Black leadership? It's like they're trying to hold us back. This is exactly why we need more diversity and representation in the party - it's not optional anymore, it's a requirement. 😒
 
🤔 The way Dem machine plays favorites is so 🙅‍♂️! They're more worried about winning than about making progress with underrepresented groups like BLM 💪. It's time for party leaders to step up and support Black candidates who are truly passionate about the community 👥, not just throw 'em under the bus when it's convenient 🚮. We need real change, not just empty promises 🤝! Michigan voters deserve better than a party that prioritizes corporate interests over people 💸. It's time to hold leaders accountable and demand diversity and representation in every aspect of politics 👊
 
🤔 This whole thing is super weird. I mean, you'd think that the people running the show (the party machinery) would be all about empowering new talent, but nope... They're basically saying "Hey, we'll support whoever's less likely to upset the status quo". It's like they're trying to preserve their own power and influence, rather than investing in the next gen. 💸

And it's not just that - it's the fact that these Black candidates were already showing some serious promise before bailing out of the race. They had strong community backing and fundraising skills... But instead of taking a chance on them, they opt for someone more palatable to the party establishment. That's what really grinds my gears 🙄.

I feel like we need some real accountability here - are these party leaders just looking out for their own interests or do they genuinely care about promoting diversity and representation? Because if it's the former, then yeah... Let them go 😒.
 
🤔 I've been drawing some diagrams 🖋️ to try and understand this situation...

```
+---------------+
| Democrat Party |
+---------------+
|
|
v
+-----------+ +-----------+
| Black | | Moderate |
| Candidates | | Candidate |
+-----------+ +-----------+
|
|
v
+-----------+
| Leadership |
| Priorities |
+-----------+
```

It seems like the party leadership is prioritizing expediency over diversity 🚫. They're backing moderate candidates over more progressive Black ones, which raises questions about what's driving this behavior 🤷‍♂️.

My diagram shows how this can lead to a splintered vote in the general election, undermining hard-won Democratic gains and erasing progress made by Black candidates 😔.

I think the party needs to prioritize diversity and representation over internal politics 💪. If they want to win in Michigan (and beyond) 🌎, they need to support Black candidates and voters as a day-to-day priority, not just on Election Day 📆.

Let's hope the voters notice this pattern and demand change 👀!
 
Back
Top