Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has been sentenced to death in absentia for crimes against humanity following a deadly crackdown on student-led protests last year. A three-judge bench of the country's international crimes tribunal found her guilty of incitement, orders to kill, and inaction to prevent atrocities as she oversaw the state-led crackdown.
The verdict, which was widely expected, was delivered without Hasina being present in court, a move that many saw as an attempt to circumvent due process. The prosecution had built its case on audio recordings of calls made by Hasina linking instructions from her office to the deadly street operations.
Human rights organizations have long accused Hasina's government of human rights abuses and corruption during her 15-year rule, which ended when a student-led uprising toppled her in August last year. Many have welcomed the verdict as a step towards justice for the victims of the violence, with one family member stating that it was "the only acceptable verdict" for their son who was killed by security forces.
However, not everyone is celebrating. Critics argue that the trial was rigged from the start and that Hasina's co-accused, former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan, received a lighter sentence due to his cooperation with the prosecution. Human rights groups have also expressed concerns about the use of capital punishment in the verdict.
As Bangladesh prepares for its first election since Hasina's ousting, her Awami League party has vowed to cause mass unrest in response. The opposition is also determined to fight back, as Hasina's son Sajeeb Wazed stated that his mother would remain "safe" but was "upset, angry, outraged".
The Indian government, where Hasina is currently living under protection, has ignored requests for her extradition to face trial. The verdict is a significant blow to Hasina's claim of being a victim of a politically motivated trial, and many see it as a turning point in the country's transition towards democracy.
The verdict, which was widely expected, was delivered without Hasina being present in court, a move that many saw as an attempt to circumvent due process. The prosecution had built its case on audio recordings of calls made by Hasina linking instructions from her office to the deadly street operations.
Human rights organizations have long accused Hasina's government of human rights abuses and corruption during her 15-year rule, which ended when a student-led uprising toppled her in August last year. Many have welcomed the verdict as a step towards justice for the victims of the violence, with one family member stating that it was "the only acceptable verdict" for their son who was killed by security forces.
However, not everyone is celebrating. Critics argue that the trial was rigged from the start and that Hasina's co-accused, former home minister Asaduzzaman Khan, received a lighter sentence due to his cooperation with the prosecution. Human rights groups have also expressed concerns about the use of capital punishment in the verdict.
As Bangladesh prepares for its first election since Hasina's ousting, her Awami League party has vowed to cause mass unrest in response. The opposition is also determined to fight back, as Hasina's son Sajeeb Wazed stated that his mother would remain "safe" but was "upset, angry, outraged".
The Indian government, where Hasina is currently living under protection, has ignored requests for her extradition to face trial. The verdict is a significant blow to Hasina's claim of being a victim of a politically motivated trial, and many see it as a turning point in the country's transition towards democracy.