Pete Carroll is facing intense scrutiny as the Las Vegas Raiders' inaugural season has been an unmitigated disaster, with the team currently sitting at 2-9. The latest development in this tumultuous tenure is the shocking firing of offensive coordinator Chip Kelly, who was also under pressure to deliver results.
The question on everyone's mind is whether Carroll's decision to axe Kelly was premature. Insiders suggest that the Raiders' offense lacked critical elements traditionally associated with Kelly's scheme, which has been likened to Shane Waldron's offense from last season. The evidence points to a departure from Kelly's trademark creative runs out of shotgun, instead opting for an under-center zone scheme favored by Carroll.
Furthermore, reports indicate that Kelly struggled with play-calling, with some instances of botched calls resulting in confusion at the line of scrimmage. He also made mistakes in installing plays not in the game plan, leaving his team unproductive on numerous occasions. It's a stark contrast to the excitement generated by Kelly's gun-based offense, which was only utilized sparingly this season.
The irony is that Kelly was surrounded by Carroll associates and had access to all the necessary resources. The question remains whether he was truly given the autonomy to execute his vision for the Raiders' offense or if he simply wasn't equipped to succeed in the team's system.
Carroll's decision to fire Kelly has raised eyebrows, with many wondering what went wrong. While some may attribute the problems to Kelly himself, others suggest that Carroll may have been too hasty in letting go of a coach who could have potentially turned the season around. As the Raiders struggle to find their footing, one thing is clear: Pete Carroll's tenure has taken a significant hit, and it remains to be seen how his team will recover from this latest setback.
The question on everyone's mind is whether Carroll's decision to axe Kelly was premature. Insiders suggest that the Raiders' offense lacked critical elements traditionally associated with Kelly's scheme, which has been likened to Shane Waldron's offense from last season. The evidence points to a departure from Kelly's trademark creative runs out of shotgun, instead opting for an under-center zone scheme favored by Carroll.
Furthermore, reports indicate that Kelly struggled with play-calling, with some instances of botched calls resulting in confusion at the line of scrimmage. He also made mistakes in installing plays not in the game plan, leaving his team unproductive on numerous occasions. It's a stark contrast to the excitement generated by Kelly's gun-based offense, which was only utilized sparingly this season.
The irony is that Kelly was surrounded by Carroll associates and had access to all the necessary resources. The question remains whether he was truly given the autonomy to execute his vision for the Raiders' offense or if he simply wasn't equipped to succeed in the team's system.
Carroll's decision to fire Kelly has raised eyebrows, with many wondering what went wrong. While some may attribute the problems to Kelly himself, others suggest that Carroll may have been too hasty in letting go of a coach who could have potentially turned the season around. As the Raiders struggle to find their footing, one thing is clear: Pete Carroll's tenure has taken a significant hit, and it remains to be seen how his team will recover from this latest setback.