Producer Pay damages for Portraying Academic as Overly Condescending in Movie Based on True Story of King Richard III's Discovery.
In a move that can only be described as vindicating, an academic has reached a settlement with the producers of a 2022 movie about the search for England's missing king, Richard III. The film, titled "The Lost King," was based on the true story of how amateur sleuth Philippa Langley led a team to locate the monarch's remains under a parking lot.
However, one academic who was portrayed in the movie has suffered what he described as "enormous distress and embarrassment" due to his depiction. Richard Taylor, a former deputy registrar at the University of Leicester, had sued the film's producers for libel over their portrayal of him as smug, unduly dismissive, and patronizing.
A preliminary hearing on the case last year found that the film had indeed misrepresented Taylor, with the judge describing his behavior in the academic community as "unacceptable." The movie also showed Langley being met with indifference and condescension from academics like Taylor.
As part of the settlement, the producers have agreed to pay substantial damages and legal costs. They will also add an on-screen clarification at the start of the film stating that Taylor's portrayal is "fictional and does not represent his actual actions."
Taylor has welcomed the outcome, saying it was a vindication after "a long and grueling battle." He attributed his decision not to dismiss Langley's request for support from the university to his eventual vindication. "There have been moments over the last three years when I thought, when Philippa Langley approached me for the university’s support, I perhaps should have put the request in the bin," he said.
On the other hand, the film's producer, Steve Coogan, has defended his portrayal of Taylor, insisting that the movie is based on a true story and that Taylor's depiction was accurate. "If it wasn’t for Philippa Langley, Richard III would still be lying under a car park in Leicester," he said.
The discovery of Richard's remains in 2012 marked a significant moment in English history and had sparked renewed debate about the monarch's reputation. While some historians, including Langley, have sought to rehabilitate Richard's image, others, like Taylor, have maintained that his depiction as an evil king was well-deserved.
Regardless of one's opinion on Richard's character, it is clear that the portrayal of academics in the movie has had a lasting impact on those who were featured. For Taylor, vindication has come at a high price, but it also serves as a reminder of the importance of accuracy and respect in storytelling.
In a move that can only be described as vindicating, an academic has reached a settlement with the producers of a 2022 movie about the search for England's missing king, Richard III. The film, titled "The Lost King," was based on the true story of how amateur sleuth Philippa Langley led a team to locate the monarch's remains under a parking lot.
However, one academic who was portrayed in the movie has suffered what he described as "enormous distress and embarrassment" due to his depiction. Richard Taylor, a former deputy registrar at the University of Leicester, had sued the film's producers for libel over their portrayal of him as smug, unduly dismissive, and patronizing.
A preliminary hearing on the case last year found that the film had indeed misrepresented Taylor, with the judge describing his behavior in the academic community as "unacceptable." The movie also showed Langley being met with indifference and condescension from academics like Taylor.
As part of the settlement, the producers have agreed to pay substantial damages and legal costs. They will also add an on-screen clarification at the start of the film stating that Taylor's portrayal is "fictional and does not represent his actual actions."
Taylor has welcomed the outcome, saying it was a vindication after "a long and grueling battle." He attributed his decision not to dismiss Langley's request for support from the university to his eventual vindication. "There have been moments over the last three years when I thought, when Philippa Langley approached me for the university’s support, I perhaps should have put the request in the bin," he said.
On the other hand, the film's producer, Steve Coogan, has defended his portrayal of Taylor, insisting that the movie is based on a true story and that Taylor's depiction was accurate. "If it wasn’t for Philippa Langley, Richard III would still be lying under a car park in Leicester," he said.
The discovery of Richard's remains in 2012 marked a significant moment in English history and had sparked renewed debate about the monarch's reputation. While some historians, including Langley, have sought to rehabilitate Richard's image, others, like Taylor, have maintained that his depiction as an evil king was well-deserved.
Regardless of one's opinion on Richard's character, it is clear that the portrayal of academics in the movie has had a lasting impact on those who were featured. For Taylor, vindication has come at a high price, but it also serves as a reminder of the importance of accuracy and respect in storytelling.
The film's producers could have avoided this situation by being more accurate and respectful in their portrayal of Richard Taylor. Instead of paying damages, they could have taken responsibility for their mistakes and acknowledged the harm caused to Taylor's reputation. Now, he has a permanent record of being "overly condescending" and "smug", which will follow him throughout his life.
Richard Taylor deserved better than to be portrayed like that in a movie about one of England's most famous kings. It's not just about him, though - it's about the impact those kinds of scenes can have on people's perceptions and reputations.
I mean, no one wants to be seen as condescending or patronizing, especially not in a story where accuracy matters. It's like, the film's producers basically lost control of their own narrative and now they're paying the price.
I mean, who wants to be shown as an idiot on the big screen? 
anyway, I think it's a good thing that they're adding that disclaimer at the start of the movie now so people know what's real and what's not. I'm still Team Philippa Langley btw, she was the one who made all that discovery happen 
i mean, i can see why they'd want to make him look like a jerk but c'mon, accuracy matters, right? 
taylor's reaction is also super relatable tbh i've been in situations where people didn't take me seriously because of my introvertedness and it got frustrating 
anyway, glad he was able to get justice and vindication 
I MEAN, COME ON, A MOVIE BASED ON A TRUE STORY SHOULD BE ABOUT ACCURACY AND RESPECT, NOT ABOUT MAKING PEOPLE LOOK BAD ON PURPOSE! IT'S OKAY TO SHOW CHARACTERS WITH FLAWS, BUT NOT TO MAKE THEM OUT TO BE SOME KIND OF MONSTER! 
.
. This settlement shows that people in power can be held accountable for their actions, which is definitely a good thing 
. Maybe this whole situation will lead to more nuanced and accurate portrayals of academics in the future 
.
) and that Taylor can finally move on from this drama 
. The idea that a movie can get away with making up characters or altering their behavior for dramatic effect is wild 
.
. If you're gonna depict real people or events, make sure you're getting it right, don't just take creative liberties to fit your narrative 
. And honestly, I think Richard Taylor was owed some respect for standing up for himself and fighting back against the inaccurate portrayal 
.
. But I guess that's just part of the process when you're working on a film based on true events – sometimes things get lost in translation 
. The fact that they agreed to add an on-screen clarification is at least a step in the right direction 
.
. we gotta remember that our words & actions have consequences, whether it's online or offline 
. the film's portrayal may have been based on a true story, but it was still a choice to make someone look a certain way 
. it's up to us to decide how we want to be represented, and to demand accuracy from those who share our stories 
.
just wondering why they need to pay damages for portraying someone's personality? shouldn't be that hard to keep it real 
It's like, what even is the point of showing someone's true personality if you're gonna take it out of context?
Let's get the facts straight, folks!
. Film producers gotta be more careful with who they cast and how they portray people's lives, you know? Accuracy matters 
... accuracy matters in storytelling, it's not just about telling a true story 
. I guess this whole thing teaches us to always fact-check and get our facts straight before we start spouting off about history 
.
.
Like, Steve Coogan's defense of his portrayal of Taylor seems like a bit of a PR stunt. Still, kudos to Taylor for standing up for himself and fighting for accuracy.
. Vindication is a big deal, especially after going through all that drama with the university and Philippa Langley