Ring is facing renewed criticism over its partnership with Flock, an AI-powered surveillance camera company. Critics claim that the alliance allows government agencies, including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), to access users' footage without proper oversight. Ring has denied these claims, stating that it does not give ICE videos, feeds, or back-end access and does not share video with them.
However, concerns have been raised over who can access users' footage under the Flock integration, which is not yet live. The company's founder, Jamie Siminoff, has argued that widespread cameras can prevent crime, but critics argue that once deployed, such systems can be used for other purposes, including mass surveillance.
To mitigate these concerns, Ring users can disable Community Requests and enable end-to-end encryption (E2E) in the app. E2E ensures that only the mobile device used to set up the camera can view footage, preventing it from being accessed by Ring or used for Community Requests.
For those who want to avoid cloud-dependent cameras entirely, there are alternative options available. Some security cameras can process video locally and fully encrypt it before sending it to the cloud, often requiring a hub for processing. Brands like Apple, Eufy, and Reolink offer local storage and video processing capabilities through their respective hubs and cameras.
Ultimately, any camera connected to the internet comes with risks of unauthorized access, regardless of the company's claims. It is essential to carefully consider adding surveillance systems to your home or neighborhood before doing so.
However, concerns have been raised over who can access users' footage under the Flock integration, which is not yet live. The company's founder, Jamie Siminoff, has argued that widespread cameras can prevent crime, but critics argue that once deployed, such systems can be used for other purposes, including mass surveillance.
To mitigate these concerns, Ring users can disable Community Requests and enable end-to-end encryption (E2E) in the app. E2E ensures that only the mobile device used to set up the camera can view footage, preventing it from being accessed by Ring or used for Community Requests.
For those who want to avoid cloud-dependent cameras entirely, there are alternative options available. Some security cameras can process video locally and fully encrypt it before sending it to the cloud, often requiring a hub for processing. Brands like Apple, Eufy, and Reolink offer local storage and video processing capabilities through their respective hubs and cameras.
Ultimately, any camera connected to the internet comes with risks of unauthorized access, regardless of the company's claims. It is essential to carefully consider adding surveillance systems to your home or neighborhood before doing so.
. I mean, I get it, security cameras can be a good thing, but we gotta think about who has access to our footage and what that means for our private lives. It's one thing when it's just a neighbor wanting to see if you parked your car in the wrong spot, but another thing entirely when it's the government 
.
. I'm starting to think that the only way to truly avoid mass surveillance is to ditch cameras altogether and rely on good old-fashioned common sense 
.
.
Ring's new partnership with Flock has me worried 
. I mean, if ICE can just tap into our security footage without us even knowing, that's a huge red flag 
️. I get that Jamie Siminoff says it's all about preventing crime, but what happens when the cameras are in people's hands? We gotta be careful who we trust with this kind of power 
. And let's be real, if you want to avoid cloud-dependent cameras altogether, there are some sick alternatives out there like Apple, Eufy, and Reolink 
. It's all about being informed and taking control of our own security 
. I think we need to think twice before installing those fancy smart cameras 
.
It's just too much for me to handle.
. I've got to admit, it's pretty reassuring to know that disabling Community Requests and enabling E2E encryption can help mitigate the risks, but what about when I'm on the go? Do I need to carry around a separate hub for processing and encrypting video? 
. I swear, it's all about "preventing crime" but really, it's just about keeping tabs on us and selling our data to whoever wants it. You gotta stay vigilant, folks! 
anyway, it's super easy to disable community requests or e2e encryption in the app if you're paranoid about it like me 
but i guess that's not enough for some people. and honestly, who wouldn't want their neighbors watching each other's backs (if they wanted to)? 
still gotta be careful tho, can't trust everyone 
. but yeah, you're right, we gotta be careful before jumping into that surveillance life 
. maybe ring should just focus on making their product better instead of trying to spin this whole flock thing 
... ring is literally the best but now they're partnering with Flock and im getting major anxiety 
. like what if gov agencies can just access our footage w/o us knowing? that's straight up creepy 
. im all for safety and crime prevention but not at the cost of our privacy, tbh 
.
.