Jersey: How a Tax Haven Protected Roman Abramovich's Billions from Sanctions
In recent years, Roman Abramovich, a Russian billionaire and former Chelsea football club owner, has found himself on the receiving end of international sanctions. However, thanks to Jersey, a tax haven in the Channel Islands, his vast fortune was protected from these measures.
A two-year legal battle between Jersey and Abramovich has finally come to an end, with 15 previously undisclosed judgments being released by the Jersey royal courts. These documents reveal that in 2016 and 2017, Abramovich and four of his closest associates were given safe harbour by Jersey under a special scheme for ultra-high net worth individuals.
Abramovich's application was approved in September 2017, with the company he set up to manage his wealth, which advised on philanthropic activities, aircraft purchases, yacht sales, and investments, being granted a license to operate in Jersey. Transfers of assets from his offshore network to Jersey took place in 2017, and again in 2021.
The British government was involved in the process, with London being extensively consulted on what was considered a politically sensitive matter involving a high-profile individual known for his close ties to Vladimir Putin's regime. Despite heightened sensitivity around Kremlin-linked figures after Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014, there were no objections from UK officials.
A report prepared by Barry Faudemer, the former head of enforcement at the Jersey Financial Services Commission, warned that Abramovich's close association with Putin raised a reputational risk to Jersey and that he could use a Jersey-registered company "to launder the proceeds of corruption on behalf of third parties including Putin."
However, Faudemer concluded that identifying evidence sufficient to support a refusal to grant a license was likely to be problematic. A back channel was opened between St Helier and London, with UK officials running checks on Abramovich and his associates.
Jersey's ministers were keen to make it work, but they wanted to proceed with care. Robert MacRae, then Jersey's attorney general, approached a contact in the directorate of national security at the UK's Foreign and Commonwealth Office, as it was then known.
After the Salisbury poisonings, all the checks were redone, again via the FCO. There are accounts of four face-to-face meetings between UK and Jersey officials, including one between Faudermer and the UK regulator the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The decision to allow Abramovich to move his wealth to Jersey was not taken lightly, with concerns raised about the reputational risk of doing so. However, a spokesperson for Jersey's attorney general welcomed the privy council's decision, adding that the investigation by the Economic Crime and Confiscation Unit in the Law Officers' Department in relation to Mr Abramovich and others remains live.
In a statement, Abramovich's lawyers said that no charges have been brought against him since the commencement of the Jersey investigation over three years ago, and there are no criminal proceedings in the jurisdiction involving him. They stressed that they had not been required to rule on whether there had been any corruption or admission of corruption by Abramovich regarding his dealings at Sibneft, and that they had not reached any conclusions on this matter.
Jersey's role as a tax haven has once again come under scrutiny, with questions raised about the island's secrecy laws and its relationship with the UK government. The decision to allow Abramovich to move his wealth to Jersey raises concerns about the island's ability to maintain its financial secrecy while also complying with international sanctions.
In recent years, Roman Abramovich, a Russian billionaire and former Chelsea football club owner, has found himself on the receiving end of international sanctions. However, thanks to Jersey, a tax haven in the Channel Islands, his vast fortune was protected from these measures.
A two-year legal battle between Jersey and Abramovich has finally come to an end, with 15 previously undisclosed judgments being released by the Jersey royal courts. These documents reveal that in 2016 and 2017, Abramovich and four of his closest associates were given safe harbour by Jersey under a special scheme for ultra-high net worth individuals.
Abramovich's application was approved in September 2017, with the company he set up to manage his wealth, which advised on philanthropic activities, aircraft purchases, yacht sales, and investments, being granted a license to operate in Jersey. Transfers of assets from his offshore network to Jersey took place in 2017, and again in 2021.
The British government was involved in the process, with London being extensively consulted on what was considered a politically sensitive matter involving a high-profile individual known for his close ties to Vladimir Putin's regime. Despite heightened sensitivity around Kremlin-linked figures after Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014, there were no objections from UK officials.
A report prepared by Barry Faudemer, the former head of enforcement at the Jersey Financial Services Commission, warned that Abramovich's close association with Putin raised a reputational risk to Jersey and that he could use a Jersey-registered company "to launder the proceeds of corruption on behalf of third parties including Putin."
However, Faudemer concluded that identifying evidence sufficient to support a refusal to grant a license was likely to be problematic. A back channel was opened between St Helier and London, with UK officials running checks on Abramovich and his associates.
Jersey's ministers were keen to make it work, but they wanted to proceed with care. Robert MacRae, then Jersey's attorney general, approached a contact in the directorate of national security at the UK's Foreign and Commonwealth Office, as it was then known.
After the Salisbury poisonings, all the checks were redone, again via the FCO. There are accounts of four face-to-face meetings between UK and Jersey officials, including one between Faudermer and the UK regulator the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The decision to allow Abramovich to move his wealth to Jersey was not taken lightly, with concerns raised about the reputational risk of doing so. However, a spokesperson for Jersey's attorney general welcomed the privy council's decision, adding that the investigation by the Economic Crime and Confiscation Unit in the Law Officers' Department in relation to Mr Abramovich and others remains live.
In a statement, Abramovich's lawyers said that no charges have been brought against him since the commencement of the Jersey investigation over three years ago, and there are no criminal proceedings in the jurisdiction involving him. They stressed that they had not been required to rule on whether there had been any corruption or admission of corruption by Abramovich regarding his dealings at Sibneft, and that they had not reached any conclusions on this matter.
Jersey's role as a tax haven has once again come under scrutiny, with questions raised about the island's secrecy laws and its relationship with the UK government. The decision to allow Abramovich to move his wealth to Jersey raises concerns about the island's ability to maintain its financial secrecy while also complying with international sanctions.