Australia's Government Kept Secret Deal with Nauru from Public: No Official Translation Available for Decade
A new revelation has come to light regarding the secret deal between the Australian government and Nauru over the country's offshore detention regime. In a shocking turn of events, it was discovered that the Australian government had taken a hastily-translated interview between Nauruan President David Adeang and officials from Australia's high commission in February 2023 without proper verification.
The translation notes were deemed too sensitive to be released to the public and were instead subject to a decade-long suppression order by both federal and high courts. The decision came after one of the asylum seekers set to be deported to Nauru, TCXM, launched a challenge against his removal in court.
According to internal government correspondence tabled in the Senate, officials discussed Adeang's comments with each other in the weeks following the interview. However, the foreign affairs and home affairs departments were advised not to release the transcript of the interview at a Senate estimates hearing in March.
In a recent statement, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong explained that the translation notes had been taken hastily by an unaccredited staff member for internal purposes only. The Nauruan government has confirmed that it will not provide any official translation of the interview, citing concerns over the accuracy and potential harm to bilateral relations.
The secrecy surrounding this deal is nothing new, as Australia's governments have repeatedly imposed secrecy around their offshore detention regime. Even the visit of Nauru's President Adeang to Canberra earlier this month was met with controversy, raising questions about the true nature of the country's contracts on Manus Island.
It remains unclear how many members of the NZYQ cohort will be transferred to Nauru and under what conditions. The Australian government has been tight-lipped about the details, citing concerns over damage to international relations. As one of the asylum seekers who challenged his removal in court awaits an appeal hearing in December, it is clear that transparency around this deal is severely lacking.
A new revelation has come to light regarding the secret deal between the Australian government and Nauru over the country's offshore detention regime. In a shocking turn of events, it was discovered that the Australian government had taken a hastily-translated interview between Nauruan President David Adeang and officials from Australia's high commission in February 2023 without proper verification.
The translation notes were deemed too sensitive to be released to the public and were instead subject to a decade-long suppression order by both federal and high courts. The decision came after one of the asylum seekers set to be deported to Nauru, TCXM, launched a challenge against his removal in court.
According to internal government correspondence tabled in the Senate, officials discussed Adeang's comments with each other in the weeks following the interview. However, the foreign affairs and home affairs departments were advised not to release the transcript of the interview at a Senate estimates hearing in March.
In a recent statement, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong explained that the translation notes had been taken hastily by an unaccredited staff member for internal purposes only. The Nauruan government has confirmed that it will not provide any official translation of the interview, citing concerns over the accuracy and potential harm to bilateral relations.
The secrecy surrounding this deal is nothing new, as Australia's governments have repeatedly imposed secrecy around their offshore detention regime. Even the visit of Nauru's President Adeang to Canberra earlier this month was met with controversy, raising questions about the true nature of the country's contracts on Manus Island.
It remains unclear how many members of the NZYQ cohort will be transferred to Nauru and under what conditions. The Australian government has been tight-lipped about the details, citing concerns over damage to international relations. As one of the asylum seekers who challenged his removal in court awaits an appeal hearing in December, it is clear that transparency around this deal is severely lacking.