Racial Disparities in Traffic Stops: NYPD's "Stop-and-Frisk on Wheels"
A new lawsuit has accused the New York City Police Department (NYPD) of perpetuating racial disparities in traffic stops, claiming that Black and Latino drivers are being targeted for searches without a legitimate reason. The complaint alleges that the NYPD has more than doubled its vehicle searches under Mayor Eric Adams' term, with Black and Latino motorists making up an overwhelming 84% of those searched.
The disparity is staggering, with white motorists accounting for less than 4%. The lawsuit also claims that only a small percentage of searches result in charges being filed. Senior counsel for criminal justice litigation at the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), Daniel Lambright, likened this practice to "stop and frisk on wheels," a reference to the NYPD's discredited policy of stopping, frisking, and questioning mostly Black and Latino pedestrians without justification.
"We call upon Mayor Adams to end this racist and shameful NYPD practice. The NYPD cannot treat our city like a constitution-free zone where Black and brown New Yorkers' rights don't matter," Lambright said in a statement.
The lawsuit cites data showing that the NYPD sends more officers to areas with high crime rates, resulting in more stops. However, the vast majority of searches do not result in an arrest for criminal possession of a weapon, with over 96% of searches yielding no arrests.
This practice is eerily reminiscent of the infamous "stop and frisk" policy that was ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge in 2013. The ruling noted that nearly 4.5 million stops between 2004 and mid-2012 resulted in only 6% of stops resulting in an arrest, with no weapons found in 91% of those cases.
While the NYPD claims that its vehicle searches are aimed at confiscating illegal firearms, the lawsuit argues that this excuse is not supported by the data. The plaintiffs, including two Black New Yorkers whose vehicles were searched without cause, demand an end to the allegedly unlawful conduct and seek money damages and attorney fees.
The case highlights the ongoing struggle for racial justice in policing, with advocates arguing that these practices perpetuate systemic racism and undermine the rights of marginalized communities. As one civil liberties group put it, "stop and frisk has not disappeared; it's simply shifted."
A new lawsuit has accused the New York City Police Department (NYPD) of perpetuating racial disparities in traffic stops, claiming that Black and Latino drivers are being targeted for searches without a legitimate reason. The complaint alleges that the NYPD has more than doubled its vehicle searches under Mayor Eric Adams' term, with Black and Latino motorists making up an overwhelming 84% of those searched.
The disparity is staggering, with white motorists accounting for less than 4%. The lawsuit also claims that only a small percentage of searches result in charges being filed. Senior counsel for criminal justice litigation at the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), Daniel Lambright, likened this practice to "stop and frisk on wheels," a reference to the NYPD's discredited policy of stopping, frisking, and questioning mostly Black and Latino pedestrians without justification.
"We call upon Mayor Adams to end this racist and shameful NYPD practice. The NYPD cannot treat our city like a constitution-free zone where Black and brown New Yorkers' rights don't matter," Lambright said in a statement.
The lawsuit cites data showing that the NYPD sends more officers to areas with high crime rates, resulting in more stops. However, the vast majority of searches do not result in an arrest for criminal possession of a weapon, with over 96% of searches yielding no arrests.
This practice is eerily reminiscent of the infamous "stop and frisk" policy that was ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge in 2013. The ruling noted that nearly 4.5 million stops between 2004 and mid-2012 resulted in only 6% of stops resulting in an arrest, with no weapons found in 91% of those cases.
While the NYPD claims that its vehicle searches are aimed at confiscating illegal firearms, the lawsuit argues that this excuse is not supported by the data. The plaintiffs, including two Black New Yorkers whose vehicles were searched without cause, demand an end to the allegedly unlawful conduct and seek money damages and attorney fees.
The case highlights the ongoing struggle for racial justice in policing, with advocates arguing that these practices perpetuate systemic racism and undermine the rights of marginalized communities. As one civil liberties group put it, "stop and frisk has not disappeared; it's simply shifted."