Racial Disparities in NYPD Vehicle Searches Exposed, Lawsuit Alleges Systemic Injustice
A new lawsuit has shed light on the New York City Police Department's (NYPD) disproportionate targeting of Black and Latino drivers for vehicle searches, a practice eerily reminiscent of the discredited "stop-and-frisk" policy that plagued the city during Mayor Michael Bloomberg's tenure.
According to the complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, the NYPD's motor vehicle searches more than doubled under Mayor Eric Adams' term, with Black and Latino drivers making up 84% of the searches between 2022 and September 2025. In contrast, white motorists accounted for less than 4%. The vast majority of these searches were conducted without a legally justifiable basis for enforcement.
Critics argue that this practice constitutes "stop-and-frisk on wheels," perpetuating systemic racism and infringing upon the constitutional rights of Black and brown New Yorkers. Daniel Lambright, senior counsel for criminal justice litigation at NYCLU, condemned the NYPD's actions, stating that far too many Black and Latino drivers are treated like criminals during routine traffic stops simply because of their skin color.
The lawsuit also reveals disturbing disparities in police behavior across different precincts and neighborhoods. Vehicle searches were conducted at higher rates in predominantly Black and Latino areas, even when controlling for crime statistics.
While the NYPD claims to be targeting specific hotspots where crimes have been reported, the data paints a stark picture of discriminatory policing practices. According to the complaint, over 96% of vehicle searches did not result in an arrest for criminal possession of a firearm โ yet this practice persists under Adams' leadership.
The lawsuit demands an end to these alleged unlawful conduct, requires the NYPD to establish "appropriate standards," and seeks compensation for the plaintiffs, including money damages and attorney fees. As NYCLU's executive director Donna Lieberman noted, stop-and-frisk has not disappeared; it simply evolved into a more insidious form of policing.
As this lawsuit continues to unfold, concerns about systemic racism and police accountability in New York City persist. It remains to be seen whether the NYPD will take concrete steps to address these disparities and uphold the rights of all citizens.
A new lawsuit has shed light on the New York City Police Department's (NYPD) disproportionate targeting of Black and Latino drivers for vehicle searches, a practice eerily reminiscent of the discredited "stop-and-frisk" policy that plagued the city during Mayor Michael Bloomberg's tenure.
According to the complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, the NYPD's motor vehicle searches more than doubled under Mayor Eric Adams' term, with Black and Latino drivers making up 84% of the searches between 2022 and September 2025. In contrast, white motorists accounted for less than 4%. The vast majority of these searches were conducted without a legally justifiable basis for enforcement.
Critics argue that this practice constitutes "stop-and-frisk on wheels," perpetuating systemic racism and infringing upon the constitutional rights of Black and brown New Yorkers. Daniel Lambright, senior counsel for criminal justice litigation at NYCLU, condemned the NYPD's actions, stating that far too many Black and Latino drivers are treated like criminals during routine traffic stops simply because of their skin color.
The lawsuit also reveals disturbing disparities in police behavior across different precincts and neighborhoods. Vehicle searches were conducted at higher rates in predominantly Black and Latino areas, even when controlling for crime statistics.
While the NYPD claims to be targeting specific hotspots where crimes have been reported, the data paints a stark picture of discriminatory policing practices. According to the complaint, over 96% of vehicle searches did not result in an arrest for criminal possession of a firearm โ yet this practice persists under Adams' leadership.
The lawsuit demands an end to these alleged unlawful conduct, requires the NYPD to establish "appropriate standards," and seeks compensation for the plaintiffs, including money damages and attorney fees. As NYCLU's executive director Donna Lieberman noted, stop-and-frisk has not disappeared; it simply evolved into a more insidious form of policing.
As this lawsuit continues to unfold, concerns about systemic racism and police accountability in New York City persist. It remains to be seen whether the NYPD will take concrete steps to address these disparities and uphold the rights of all citizens.