Supreme Court Weighs Fate of Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order as Constitutionality Comes Under Scrutiny
In a significant development, the US Supreme Court has agreed to review President Donald Trump's order on birthright citizenship, which aims to restrict the citizenship of children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or temporarily. The move marks a critical juncture in the administration's efforts to crack down on immigration, with far-reaching implications for millions of American-born citizens.
The order, signed by Trump on his first day as president, declares that children born to non-citizens cannot automatically become US citizens. This would effectively overturn more than 125 years of precedent under the Constitution's 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to anyone born on American soil with narrow exceptions for foreign diplomats and their children.
Despite initial uncertainty, lower courts have consistently ruled against the order, finding that it violates or is likely to violate the 14th Amendment. The federal judge in New Hampshire's case was the latest to block the citizenship restrictions, sparking a class-action lawsuit involving all affected children.
The Trump administration asserts that the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause only applies to the children of freed slaves and their descendants, not those born to aliens illegally or temporarily in the United States. In urging the Supreme Court's review, top administration lawyer D. John Sauer argued that the amendment was intended to provide citizenship to newly freed slaves' children, not the offspring of foreign nationals.
As the case moves forward, it has sparked intense debate among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Twenty-four Republican-led states and 27 Republican lawmakers, including Sens. Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham, have backed the administration's stance, while Democrats have vigorously opposed it.
With a spring hearing scheduled and a definitive ruling expected by early summer, the Supreme Court is set to deliver a critical verdict on the Trump administration's immigration policies. The implications of this decision will be far-reaching, affecting not only the citizenship status of millions of American-born children but also shaping the nation's approach to immigration and national identity.
In a significant development, the US Supreme Court has agreed to review President Donald Trump's order on birthright citizenship, which aims to restrict the citizenship of children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or temporarily. The move marks a critical juncture in the administration's efforts to crack down on immigration, with far-reaching implications for millions of American-born citizens.
The order, signed by Trump on his first day as president, declares that children born to non-citizens cannot automatically become US citizens. This would effectively overturn more than 125 years of precedent under the Constitution's 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to anyone born on American soil with narrow exceptions for foreign diplomats and their children.
Despite initial uncertainty, lower courts have consistently ruled against the order, finding that it violates or is likely to violate the 14th Amendment. The federal judge in New Hampshire's case was the latest to block the citizenship restrictions, sparking a class-action lawsuit involving all affected children.
The Trump administration asserts that the Fourteenth Amendment's Citizenship Clause only applies to the children of freed slaves and their descendants, not those born to aliens illegally or temporarily in the United States. In urging the Supreme Court's review, top administration lawyer D. John Sauer argued that the amendment was intended to provide citizenship to newly freed slaves' children, not the offspring of foreign nationals.
As the case moves forward, it has sparked intense debate among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Twenty-four Republican-led states and 27 Republican lawmakers, including Sens. Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham, have backed the administration's stance, while Democrats have vigorously opposed it.
With a spring hearing scheduled and a definitive ruling expected by early summer, the Supreme Court is set to deliver a critical verdict on the Trump administration's immigration policies. The implications of this decision will be far-reaching, affecting not only the citizenship status of millions of American-born children but also shaping the nation's approach to immigration and national identity.
. I mean, come on, if we're going to restrict citizenship for kids born here, shouldn't that be up to Congress to decide? Not some executive order by Trump 
. And what's with the argument about the 14th Amendment only applying to freed slaves? That's just a convenient way to rewrite history 
. And don't even get me started on this class-action lawsuit - who gets to decide that, exactly? The kids themselves? Their parents? It's like they're being treated as collateral damage in some massive immigration battle 
. Can we please just have a straightforward conversation about how we want to approach immigration instead of all the backroom politicking and court drama? 
I'm literally shocked that some states are even trying to pass laws like this 
It's not like our founding fathers didn't think about the kids born to non-citizens when they wrote that amendment, right? 
The fact that some lawmakers are trying to say that it only applies to freed slaves and their descendants is just plain racist...I mean, not intentional racism, but you get what I'm saying 
. And can we please talk about the mental health implications of all this uncertainty for these kids and their families? 
The stress and anxiety must be through the roof 
Fingers crossed we can get a decision that says these kids can just chill and be citizens without a fuss. 
. but at the same time, i can see why some people would be worried about national security and whatnot 
.
it seems so unfair to all those ppl born in the us with non-citizen parents... like what even is citizenship if not being born here? 
. The thing is, it's so complicated... like, does the 14th Amendment really only apply to freed slaves? 
cant even imagine how scary it must be for them not knowing if they'll be able to stay or go with their fams 
cant we just have empathy & understanding for everyone involved 
. I'm kinda surprised more people aren't talking about this more loudly. The fact that 24 states are on board with this is wild 
. The fact that lower courts have already blocked it and now the SC is reviewing it makes me think they're gonna come down on the side of the 14th Amendment, which I get - birthright citizenship has been a thing for over 125 years for a reason 
. But at the same time, I'm also thinking about all those people who might be affected by this... their parents could've just as easily been born here and still managed to become citizens if things had gone differently in the past 
