In the wake of a deadly ICE shooting in Minneapolis, several prominent researchers at major tech companies are speaking out against the Trump administration's immigration tactics. This growing dissent from employees, however, contrasts with the relative silence of their CEOs.
The killing of an unarmed US citizen by ICE agents has sparked widespread outrage and calls for action among some 150 tech workers who have signed a petition demanding that their company CEOs take a stand against ICE's violence and speak out against its recent actions. The list of signatories includes employees from companies such as Google, Meta, Amazon, OpenAI, TikTok, Spotify, Salesforce, LinkedIn, and Rippling.
While the petition is a notable development in the tech industry's response to sociopolitical crises, many have noted that it is unusual for tech leaders to take a stand on immigration issues. Historian Margaret O'Mara argues that business leaders often avoid taking a stance on political issues due to concerns about their bottom line. "Political instability is not good for bottom lines," she says.
Despite the mixed record of tech companies in addressing sociopolitical crises, some have shown courage in speaking out. Researchers at Anthropic and Databricks, such as Nikhil Thorat and Jonathan Frankle, have denounced the Trump administration's tactics as callous and immoral. Chief AI scientist at Databricks, Jonathan Frankle, has added his voice to Thorat's post criticizing ICE's actions.
Venture capitalist Jason Calacanis has also weighed in on the issue, suggesting that masked unidentified federal agents asking people for their "papers" are breaking the 4th amendment.
While some tech leaders have shown willingness to take a stand, many others remain silent. The contrast between employee dissent and CEO silence highlights the changing political landscape in the US and its impact on the tech industry.
The growing divide within the tech sector raises questions about the extent to which companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, and others will continue to stay out of the fray on immigration issues.
The killing of an unarmed US citizen by ICE agents has sparked widespread outrage and calls for action among some 150 tech workers who have signed a petition demanding that their company CEOs take a stand against ICE's violence and speak out against its recent actions. The list of signatories includes employees from companies such as Google, Meta, Amazon, OpenAI, TikTok, Spotify, Salesforce, LinkedIn, and Rippling.
While the petition is a notable development in the tech industry's response to sociopolitical crises, many have noted that it is unusual for tech leaders to take a stand on immigration issues. Historian Margaret O'Mara argues that business leaders often avoid taking a stance on political issues due to concerns about their bottom line. "Political instability is not good for bottom lines," she says.
Despite the mixed record of tech companies in addressing sociopolitical crises, some have shown courage in speaking out. Researchers at Anthropic and Databricks, such as Nikhil Thorat and Jonathan Frankle, have denounced the Trump administration's tactics as callous and immoral. Chief AI scientist at Databricks, Jonathan Frankle, has added his voice to Thorat's post criticizing ICE's actions.
Venture capitalist Jason Calacanis has also weighed in on the issue, suggesting that masked unidentified federal agents asking people for their "papers" are breaking the 4th amendment.
While some tech leaders have shown willingness to take a stand, many others remain silent. The contrast between employee dissent and CEO silence highlights the changing political landscape in the US and its impact on the tech industry.
The growing divide within the tech sector raises questions about the extent to which companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, and others will continue to stay out of the fray on immigration issues.