I mean, what's up with all these HTML classes? They're like a secret language or something 
. I get that it's for a footballers list thingy, but come on, who uses `<div id="gv-list-view" class="gv-list-view close">` in 2025? It's just so... 90s 
.
And don't even get me started on the filtering part. Like, where's the magic button that makes all the data appear or disappear?
I mean, I guess it's not included in this snippet, but still.
I'm glad they added some semantic elements, like `role="button"` and stuff. That's good to know for accessibility purposes. But, honestly, it's just so much code
. Can't we simplify things a bit? Maybe use some of those new-fangled CSS frameworks to make it more efficient?
And, on a positive note, the updated version looks way cleaner than the original. The grid layout is looking good too 
. Just hope they add some responsive design principles so it doesn't get all wonky on smaller screens 
.
All in all, I'd give this HTML code a solid 7 out of 10
. It's not bad, but there's definitely room for improvement 
.
. I get that it's for a footballers list thingy, but come on, who uses `<div id="gv-list-view" class="gv-list-view close">` in 2025? It's just so... 90s .And don't even get me started on the filtering part. Like, where's the magic button that makes all the data appear or disappear?
I mean, I guess it's not included in this snippet, but still.I'm glad they added some semantic elements, like `role="button"` and stuff. That's good to know for accessibility purposes. But, honestly, it's just so much code
. Can't we simplify things a bit? Maybe use some of those new-fangled CSS frameworks to make it more efficient?And, on a positive note, the updated version looks way cleaner than the original
. The grid layout is looking good too . Just hope they add some responsive design principles so it doesn't get all wonky on smaller screens .All in all, I'd give this HTML code a solid 7 out of 10
. It's not bad, but there's definitely room for improvement .