I'm kinda surprised they're still using that outdated term "FAST" for free ad-supported services . Can't we just call them free streaming services or something? Anyway, I think the most interesting thing is how Philo is offering such a low price point ($25/month) and still managing to deliver over 50 live channels. It's a great option for people who don't want to break the bank . But at the same time, YouTube TV and Hulu + Live TV are still pretty pricey ($84.99/month). I wish they'd consider offering more affordable options with similar channel lineups .
I think what's really important here is finding the right balance between affordability and features . It's easy to get caught up in trying to save $10-20 per month by opting for a cheaper plan, but if it means sacrificing too many channels or having limited DVR storage, it might not be worth it.
On the other hand, splurging on a more expensive plan can provide access to a wider range of channels and features. But what's most important is making sure that your needs are met without breaking the bank . It's all about prioritizing what matters most to you as a viewer.
And let's not forget about the value of having options - whether it's paying for a service or opting for free ad-supported streaming services, there's pros and cons to each approach . By being mindful of our choices and weighing the trade-offs, we can find a solution that works for us in the long run .
I'm so over the commercials ! But seriously, I think FuboTV is worth it for sports fans like my hubby . He's always watching live games and can't get enough of those channels. And with Philo being so affordable ($25/month), we actually switched to that last year and haven't looked back . It's not as extensive in terms of channels, but the quality is great and it doesn't break the bank. I've also been meaning to try out YouTube TV since they have a good selection of local channels . Anyone else had good luck with any of these services?