A slow train is finally coming to the north of England. The government has unveiled plans to revive the long-stalled Northern Powerhouse Rail project, with a £45 billion price tag that could potentially transform the region's creaky rail network.
The delay in bringing this project to fruition is staggering. Since George Osborne first proposed it back in 2014, the NPR has been stuck in limbo, bogged down by bureaucratic red tape and a lack of funding. The promised high-speed connection between Manchester and Leeds was scrapped, and a second line, HS3, proved to be an unfunded pipe dream.
The latest proposal includes a new station for Bradford, the country's worst-connected big city, and a £1.1 billion initial investment from the government. While this is a step in the right direction, concerns remain about the delivery of these plans. The major work won't start until the 2030s and 40s, with construction on the new Birmingham-Manchester line expected to begin 20 years later.
It's little wonder that cynicism surrounds this plan. After decades of broken promises and missed deadlines, many people in the north are wary of another failed rail project. The government's commitment to upgrading the rail network is welcome, but it must be backed up by a clear plan for delivery and significant investment.
The economic case for improving the transport infrastructure in the north is clear-cut. Easier mobility will boost productivity and help narrow the gap with southern England. But only if this plan is implemented on time and on scale.
The government needs to reassure the public that they won't be left waiting years, or even decades, for a functioning rail network. Long-suffering passengers and commuters have had enough of delays and cancellations. It's time for a reliable train service that can keep pace with the region's growing economy.
The delay in bringing this project to fruition is staggering. Since George Osborne first proposed it back in 2014, the NPR has been stuck in limbo, bogged down by bureaucratic red tape and a lack of funding. The promised high-speed connection between Manchester and Leeds was scrapped, and a second line, HS3, proved to be an unfunded pipe dream.
The latest proposal includes a new station for Bradford, the country's worst-connected big city, and a £1.1 billion initial investment from the government. While this is a step in the right direction, concerns remain about the delivery of these plans. The major work won't start until the 2030s and 40s, with construction on the new Birmingham-Manchester line expected to begin 20 years later.
It's little wonder that cynicism surrounds this plan. After decades of broken promises and missed deadlines, many people in the north are wary of another failed rail project. The government's commitment to upgrading the rail network is welcome, but it must be backed up by a clear plan for delivery and significant investment.
The economic case for improving the transport infrastructure in the north is clear-cut. Easier mobility will boost productivity and help narrow the gap with southern England. But only if this plan is implemented on time and on scale.
The government needs to reassure the public that they won't be left waiting years, or even decades, for a functioning rail network. Long-suffering passengers and commuters have had enough of delays and cancellations. It's time for a reliable train service that can keep pace with the region's growing economy.