Britain's crisis isn't just about investment; it's also about maintenance. The country has built institutions that struggle to function coherently and plan beyond the next crisis. The Conservative government's approach to state spending has been marked by a focus on capital expenditures, but this has come at the cost of neglecting essential maintenance.
The justice secretary, David Lammy, is right to point fingers at his predecessors for the failures in state competence. Under austerity, prison budgets were slashed and staff numbers were reduced, leading to a "slow-motion collapse" of the system. The result is that services are understaffed and overburdened, with mistakes like the accidental release of Hadush Kebatu becoming all too common.
The problem isn't just about underfunding; it's also about the politics behind it. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has been a key player in pushing austerity measures, but recent shifts suggest that its views are changing. In fact, some academics argue that investment is not just a driver of productivity, but a necessity for economic growth.
The OBR's shift in perspective could be a significant step forward. By recognizing the value of public investment and quantifying the cost of understaffed services, it could become a more valuable tool for policymakers than a purely fiscal umpire. The evidence is clear: when institutions fail to function properly, it has far-reaching consequences for society as a whole.
The question now is whether this shift in perspective will be enough to address Britain's crisis of state competence. With the government still focused on adding new prison places rather than addressing the root causes of the problem, it seems unlikely that things will change anytime soon. But with the OBR taking a more nuanced view, there is hope that policymakers may finally start to prioritize maintenance alongside investment.
The justice secretary, David Lammy, is right to point fingers at his predecessors for the failures in state competence. Under austerity, prison budgets were slashed and staff numbers were reduced, leading to a "slow-motion collapse" of the system. The result is that services are understaffed and overburdened, with mistakes like the accidental release of Hadush Kebatu becoming all too common.
The problem isn't just about underfunding; it's also about the politics behind it. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has been a key player in pushing austerity measures, but recent shifts suggest that its views are changing. In fact, some academics argue that investment is not just a driver of productivity, but a necessity for economic growth.
The OBR's shift in perspective could be a significant step forward. By recognizing the value of public investment and quantifying the cost of understaffed services, it could become a more valuable tool for policymakers than a purely fiscal umpire. The evidence is clear: when institutions fail to function properly, it has far-reaching consequences for society as a whole.
The question now is whether this shift in perspective will be enough to address Britain's crisis of state competence. With the government still focused on adding new prison places rather than addressing the root causes of the problem, it seems unlikely that things will change anytime soon. But with the OBR taking a more nuanced view, there is hope that policymakers may finally start to prioritize maintenance alongside investment.