US President Donald Trump's latest threat against Iran is not only unhelpful but also hypocritical. The American leader recently urged Iranians to continue protesting, assuring them that "help is on its way." However, the US president soon downplayed the extent of the violence, sparking outrage among both Iranians and Americans who value human life.
Now, Trump has vowed that a massive naval armada is heading towards Iran, with a promise that the next attack will be even more devastating than last summer's Operation Midnight Hammer. This brazen display of aggression only serves to further entrench the Iranian regime in its grip on power, which seems increasingly unstable and on the brink of collapse.
The US president's interventionism has diverted attention away from pressing domestic issues such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement brutality at home. Iran, a far more convenient target for Trump, allows him to flex his military muscles without facing significant consequences.
Many experts now view Iran as a "zombie state" unable to ensure basic living standards or protect its sovereignty. Military intervention would only exacerbate the humanitarian crisis, potentially leading to regime collapse and chaos. In reality, the best hope for non-proliferation lies in reviving the JCPOA deal that Trump most aggressively sought to dismantle.
While Israel sees a weakened Iran as an opportunity to expand its influence, other nations like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and others are trying to sabotage US efforts due to fears of increased instability and migration. Economic concerns seem more likely to sway Trump than humanitarian considerations.
The European Union has taken symbolic steps to condemn the Iranian regime's human rights abuses, including designating the Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist entity. However, it is crucial that governments prioritize pressuring Iran to halt executions, support internet connectivity for Iranians, fund NGOs documenting abuses, and provide safe passage for activists facing persecution.
Ultimately, military intervention is not the answer; neither is complacency in the face of Iranian civilians' suffering. A more nuanced approach is needed, one that supports civil society, strengthens it, and prioritizes human rights above all else.
Now, Trump has vowed that a massive naval armada is heading towards Iran, with a promise that the next attack will be even more devastating than last summer's Operation Midnight Hammer. This brazen display of aggression only serves to further entrench the Iranian regime in its grip on power, which seems increasingly unstable and on the brink of collapse.
The US president's interventionism has diverted attention away from pressing domestic issues such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement brutality at home. Iran, a far more convenient target for Trump, allows him to flex his military muscles without facing significant consequences.
Many experts now view Iran as a "zombie state" unable to ensure basic living standards or protect its sovereignty. Military intervention would only exacerbate the humanitarian crisis, potentially leading to regime collapse and chaos. In reality, the best hope for non-proliferation lies in reviving the JCPOA deal that Trump most aggressively sought to dismantle.
While Israel sees a weakened Iran as an opportunity to expand its influence, other nations like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and others are trying to sabotage US efforts due to fears of increased instability and migration. Economic concerns seem more likely to sway Trump than humanitarian considerations.
The European Union has taken symbolic steps to condemn the Iranian regime's human rights abuses, including designating the Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist entity. However, it is crucial that governments prioritize pressuring Iran to halt executions, support internet connectivity for Iranians, fund NGOs documenting abuses, and provide safe passage for activists facing persecution.
Ultimately, military intervention is not the answer; neither is complacency in the face of Iranian civilians' suffering. A more nuanced approach is needed, one that supports civil society, strengthens it, and prioritizes human rights above all else.