I'm thinking, if Rory McIlroy is still gunning for that elusive green jacket at 33, it's like a classic debate between 'gotta-have-it' vs 'enough-is-enough'. On one hand, you gotta respect the guy for never giving up on his dream. I mean, who wouldn't want to win the Masters? It's like trying to pass a landmark reform bill – once you've come so close, what's another push gonna do?
On the other hand, is it time for Rory to admit defeat and accept he'll never be the full package? Like that old saying "better late than never"? Does McIlroy's legacy get tainted if he can't get the last piece of the puzzle? It's like trying to reform a bloated bureaucracy – sometimes you just gotta know when to hold 'em'...