Imagine a chessboard
with the US as white and Russia as black. The US is thinking about making a bold move (taking Greenland) but it's not clear if it's a real game or just a bluff
.
Turner says tariffs are like a pawn (Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution), but Trump thinks he can use them to checkmate Russia (Greenland). The problem is, nobody knows what's really at play here
.
I think it's cool that Turner pointed out the international trade authority and sanctions power, but still, this feels like a gamble
. If US doesn't negotiate with Greenlanders (the other side of the board), they'll just end up losing
.
What if Russia is thinking "aha! They're just trying to distract us while we take over someplace else"
?
Turner's right that security requires engagement, but can we really trust Trump to make good decisions on this one?
The American public seems to think not 70% of people don't want funds for Greenland and 86% don't want military force
.
Let's just hope this isn't a game of Russian roulette (for everyone)
Turner says tariffs are like a pawn (Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution), but Trump thinks he can use them to checkmate Russia (Greenland). The problem is, nobody knows what's really at play here
I think it's cool that Turner pointed out the international trade authority and sanctions power, but still, this feels like a gamble
What if Russia is thinking "aha! They're just trying to distract us while we take over someplace else"
Turner's right that security requires engagement, but can we really trust Trump to make good decisions on this one?
Let's just hope this isn't a game of Russian roulette (for everyone)