The Trump administration has deliberately aimed to demoralize staff at the National Park Service, a top official alleged in leaked audio recordings. According to Don Striker, a veteran regional director overseeing parks in Alaska, a recent directive from Washington mandated supervisors limit high scores on employee evaluations. This move led to widespread discontent among park rangers and reduced morale.
Critics claim this measure was designed to make layoffs easier by artificially lowering ratings, rendering it difficult for employees to maintain satisfactory performance reviews. With over 60% of federal employees receiving top marks in previous years, the new policy effectively levels the playing field against underperforming workers.
As a result, employees are now forced to settle for lower scores or risk losing their jobs. This move has been seen as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to dismantle checks and balances on its power.
Striker believes that the current performance review system was crafted outside the National Park Service and overseen by top officials in Washington, including Russell Vought's Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management. He stated, "It's just another method of trying to bring morale down." Striker also mentioned that supervisors were given instructions from top-level officials, which led to the implementation of this new rating system.
The National Park Service has dismissed these allegations, stating they are working towards normalizing ratings across the agency, aiming for fair and consistent evaluations in all parks and programs. However, Striker's statements have ignited concerns among park employees who fear that the new performance review process is an attempt to make layoffs easier.
Critics argue that this measure represents a broader change in management practices within the federal government under the Trump administration.
Critics claim this measure was designed to make layoffs easier by artificially lowering ratings, rendering it difficult for employees to maintain satisfactory performance reviews. With over 60% of federal employees receiving top marks in previous years, the new policy effectively levels the playing field against underperforming workers.
As a result, employees are now forced to settle for lower scores or risk losing their jobs. This move has been seen as part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to dismantle checks and balances on its power.
Striker believes that the current performance review system was crafted outside the National Park Service and overseen by top officials in Washington, including Russell Vought's Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Personnel Management. He stated, "It's just another method of trying to bring morale down." Striker also mentioned that supervisors were given instructions from top-level officials, which led to the implementation of this new rating system.
The National Park Service has dismissed these allegations, stating they are working towards normalizing ratings across the agency, aiming for fair and consistent evaluations in all parks and programs. However, Striker's statements have ignited concerns among park employees who fear that the new performance review process is an attempt to make layoffs easier.
Critics argue that this measure represents a broader change in management practices within the federal government under the Trump administration.