Federal Response to Alaskan Storm Leaves Hundreds Homeless and Criticized for Delay in Disaster Declaration.
The recent devastating storm in Alaska, which displaced hundreds of people and left them without homes, has raised questions about the federal government's response. According to experts, President Trump's efforts to dismantle weather and climate protections have hindered the warning process, leading to catastrophic damage and a large-scale evacuation.
The storm, Typhoon Halong, made landfall on October 12 in remote communities in the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta of south-west Alaska, causing widespread flooding that forced people to leave behind their belongings. The situation was exacerbated by the fact that many weather balloons were not operating due to staffing constraints imposed by the Trump administration.
"This disaster is of a severity that the request would have normally been signed within a day of receiving a governor's request," said Samantha Montano, an emergency management expert. "Not doing so is a deeply alarming departure from what Americans have come to expect from the federal government in times of disaster."
The delayed federal response has also raised concerns about the long-term recovery process. Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy estimated that it could take over 18 months for survivors to return to their homes due to the severity of the damage.
Critics, including experts and local officials, argue that President Trump's cuts to weather balloons have had a significant impact on the accuracy of weather forecasts, leading to a delayed warning process. Rick Thoman, a former National Weather Service meteorologist, said that "the final track and intensity weren't clear until the storm was within 36 hours of crossing into Alaska waters," highlighting the importance of timely weather forecasts in evacuations.
The situation has also highlighted the region's vulnerability to rising sea levels due to climate change. The Trump administration's cuts to federal grants aimed at helping the region mitigate disaster risks have been criticized by experts and local officials.
As the recovery process begins, many are left wondering what could have been done differently to prevent this disaster. The delayed response has left hundreds without homes, and the long-term effects of this storm will likely be felt for years to come.
The recent devastating storm in Alaska, which displaced hundreds of people and left them without homes, has raised questions about the federal government's response. According to experts, President Trump's efforts to dismantle weather and climate protections have hindered the warning process, leading to catastrophic damage and a large-scale evacuation.
The storm, Typhoon Halong, made landfall on October 12 in remote communities in the Yukon-Kuskokwim delta of south-west Alaska, causing widespread flooding that forced people to leave behind their belongings. The situation was exacerbated by the fact that many weather balloons were not operating due to staffing constraints imposed by the Trump administration.
"This disaster is of a severity that the request would have normally been signed within a day of receiving a governor's request," said Samantha Montano, an emergency management expert. "Not doing so is a deeply alarming departure from what Americans have come to expect from the federal government in times of disaster."
The delayed federal response has also raised concerns about the long-term recovery process. Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy estimated that it could take over 18 months for survivors to return to their homes due to the severity of the damage.
Critics, including experts and local officials, argue that President Trump's cuts to weather balloons have had a significant impact on the accuracy of weather forecasts, leading to a delayed warning process. Rick Thoman, a former National Weather Service meteorologist, said that "the final track and intensity weren't clear until the storm was within 36 hours of crossing into Alaska waters," highlighting the importance of timely weather forecasts in evacuations.
The situation has also highlighted the region's vulnerability to rising sea levels due to climate change. The Trump administration's cuts to federal grants aimed at helping the region mitigate disaster risks have been criticized by experts and local officials.
As the recovery process begins, many are left wondering what could have been done differently to prevent this disaster. The delayed response has left hundreds without homes, and the long-term effects of this storm will likely be felt for years to come.