Former President Donald Trump has set a new bar for self-dealing pardons, rewarding his crypto cronies with blanket forgiveness after they've benefited his family's interests. In a bizarre twist of events, he now claims the Biden administration was waging a "war on cryptocurrency," which allowed him to pardon Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao on flimsy grounds.
Sources close to the deal say Zhao pleaded guilty under a carefully negotiated arrangement, one that allowed him to walk free after serving only four months in prison and paying a small fine equivalent to a tiny fraction of his vast wealth. Critics describe this as a "sweetheart deal" that enabled Binance to maintain its dominance over the industry.
The pardoning has sparked accusations that Trump's White House manipulated facts, with many arguing that this self-serving move may have been part of a broader agenda to advance cryptocurrency interests and shield himself from accountability for any potential wrongdoing. Critics note that Zhao got off scot-free while others in similar situations have faced more severe consequences.
Progressive critics long lamented the leniency shown by former administrations, including Biden's, towards corporate crime. They argue this pardon has reinforced their concerns about the administration's handling of such cases and its priorities regarding high-stakes finance issues like terrorism and cybercrime. As an example, they point to a notable comparison between Zhao's deal and that of top bankers who escaped jail time during the Great Recession.
By granting Zhao a pardon, Trump directly tied his administration's record on cryptocurrency regulation to what he calls a "war on crypto." Critics describe this narrative as simplistic and factually inaccurate. What is clear, however, is that Trump has used such pardons to solidify his influence over key sectors of the economy while maintaining a veneer of legitimacy.
Binance co-founder Zhao benefits from this pardon after previously cooperating with investigators by agreeing to pay $4 billion in fines. The fine amount and prison sentence reflect a balance struck between leniency for Binance and accountability for its founder. It appears that Trump's actions have not only shielded his own family's business interests but also continue the trend of lax enforcement seen under previous administrations.
While some analysts see this as a significant overreach by Biden's administration, others emphasize that such pardons are rare exceptions rather than the rule. The issue is highlighted against the backdrop of other Trump policies aimed at expanding cryptocurrency regulation and reversing perceived crackdowns on crypto interests by successive administrations.
In essence, the pardon of Zhao by former President Donald Trump raises questions about accountability in high-stakes finance cases and highlights concerns over potential cronyism within his administration. As one observer put it, "If you consider how seriously the establishment of both political parties takes issues like terrorism," a four-month prison sentence is indeed "comically inadequate."
Sources close to the deal say Zhao pleaded guilty under a carefully negotiated arrangement, one that allowed him to walk free after serving only four months in prison and paying a small fine equivalent to a tiny fraction of his vast wealth. Critics describe this as a "sweetheart deal" that enabled Binance to maintain its dominance over the industry.
The pardoning has sparked accusations that Trump's White House manipulated facts, with many arguing that this self-serving move may have been part of a broader agenda to advance cryptocurrency interests and shield himself from accountability for any potential wrongdoing. Critics note that Zhao got off scot-free while others in similar situations have faced more severe consequences.
Progressive critics long lamented the leniency shown by former administrations, including Biden's, towards corporate crime. They argue this pardon has reinforced their concerns about the administration's handling of such cases and its priorities regarding high-stakes finance issues like terrorism and cybercrime. As an example, they point to a notable comparison between Zhao's deal and that of top bankers who escaped jail time during the Great Recession.
By granting Zhao a pardon, Trump directly tied his administration's record on cryptocurrency regulation to what he calls a "war on crypto." Critics describe this narrative as simplistic and factually inaccurate. What is clear, however, is that Trump has used such pardons to solidify his influence over key sectors of the economy while maintaining a veneer of legitimacy.
Binance co-founder Zhao benefits from this pardon after previously cooperating with investigators by agreeing to pay $4 billion in fines. The fine amount and prison sentence reflect a balance struck between leniency for Binance and accountability for its founder. It appears that Trump's actions have not only shielded his own family's business interests but also continue the trend of lax enforcement seen under previous administrations.
While some analysts see this as a significant overreach by Biden's administration, others emphasize that such pardons are rare exceptions rather than the rule. The issue is highlighted against the backdrop of other Trump policies aimed at expanding cryptocurrency regulation and reversing perceived crackdowns on crypto interests by successive administrations.
In essence, the pardon of Zhao by former President Donald Trump raises questions about accountability in high-stakes finance cases and highlights concerns over potential cronyism within his administration. As one observer put it, "If you consider how seriously the establishment of both political parties takes issues like terrorism," a four-month prison sentence is indeed "comically inadequate."